Jump to content

User talk:Toddy1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Srabanta Deb (talk | contribs) at 13:56, 8 September 2023 (→‎Santa Das Kathiababa's register has been attached with ample references today.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Can you become the Supreme Leader of the Supreme Cabal?
Wikibreak
Third opinion
$220
Chance
?
Mediation
$220
Arbitration
$240
Jimbo Wales
$200
In the news
$260
On this day
$260
MediaWiki
$150
Did you know
$280
You are banned!
RFA
$200
WIKIOPOLYFPC
$300
PERM
$180
POTD
$300
Community discussionCommunity discussion
Editor review
$180
FAC
$320
Developers
$200
Rouge admin
$200
Deletion review
$160
Chance
?
AFD
$140
TFA
$350
Wikimedia Foundation
$150
Edit war
(pay $100)
CSD
$140
Main Page
$400
WP:BANNED
Just browsing
WikiProject Spam
$120
UAA
$100
Chance
?
AIV
$100
Admin cabal
$200
Teh Drahmaz
(pay $200)
AN
$60
Community discussionANI
$60
Go
Collect $200 salary as you pass


Feodosia: map spam

Feodosia lat,long:

  • 45.048889,35.379167 = spam (current)
  • 45.022496,35.3231897 = Genoese Fortress, Feodosia
  • 45.0214958,35.3970795 = Genoese fortress, Starokarantynna Street, Feodosia
  • 45.022038,35.400664 = File:Feodosiya Genoese fortress of Caffa IMG 2991 1725.jpg
  • 45.022378, 35.400333 = lower Tower, Genoese fortress, Starokarantynna Street, Feodosia
  • 45.0215621,35.3992733 = upper Tower, Genoese fortress, Starokarantynna Street, Feodosia

Since "upper Tower, Genoese fortress" is intact and clear in satellite imagery I chose 45.0215621,35.3992733.

.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sock's Disruptive edits

Thanks for notifying the talk pages discussion to me, I strongly believe this user:Wikiking123454321 is a sock of @Toomanyyearskodakblack / @SahafatKaLover18 see same behavior violating WP:BOLP, vandalism, personal attacks, political agenda base edits at the same articles [1], [2]. I hope admin @Bbb23: & @Yamla: will deal with him. 223.123.86.10 (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me. I cannot see a sock puppet investigation for them at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. Please could you start one, explaining why you think that he/she is a sock. It is probably a good idea to set checkuser=y in the request.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I spent a few minutes browsing through your contributions and I really admire what you bring to this beautiful encyclopedia. Wikipedia appears to be undergoing a negative transformation due to persistent online advocates who rigidly adhere to their own interpretation of what an encyclopedia should be. These individuals exhibit an attitude of superiority and scorn, contributing to an environment that feels bureaucratic and uninviting for potential new editors.

Thank you for upholding the true purpose of Wikipedia. Padurina (talk) 18:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Padurina only made 51 edits to Wikipedia,[3] so you might think that he/she did not have enough experience of Wikipedia to make a judgement. But in reality he/she has been editing since 31 October 2020 under something like 218 accounts.Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Prince Of Roblox-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monopoly board

Is this your own creation? Seems like a quite instructive forewarning. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I copied it from another Wikipedia user's talk page. This search shows it is on 23 user pages and user talk pages (in at least one of these you have to uncollapse a collapse-box).-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve this more than me

Thought it was over

Hi @Toddy1 I thought it was over since the last comment was three days before. I tried to carry forward the discussion at Capital talk page. Nigej got in and told me about my mistake and asked me to revert. I have done that. Do I need to do something more. Because I now want to get out of that thing. I have given 5b days of my time to that. I no longer want to be a part of this. Do I need to apologise for closing it. If yes please tell I will do so. I just want to get out of there ASAP. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do I need to apologise for closing it - no. Just try not to do it again.
I do not think that you should have closed the discussions at WP:ANI (1) (2). On your own talk page, it is OK for you to close a discussion. On other talk pages it is not a good idea to close a discussion where you are involved. WP:ANI has an archiving bot that archives sections where the most recent post is three days old, so there really is no need to close discussions like you did at WP:ANI. The time when closing a discussion is a good thing is when admins have made a decision – but then leave it to the admins to close it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I hope you are doing well, Toddy1. Well, mistakes happen to everyone. I remember a discussion on the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance's talk page about an abbreviation, in which Shaan Sengupta and I were involved. Shaan Sengupta closed that discussion, but I did not agree with the decision. Due to my busy schedule, I was unable to get involved in that matter again. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @TheChunky, The votes that came were only in favour of I.N.D.I.A. Last comment was on 20th July and I closed it on 9 August. Since there was no more comments or votes I closed it there only. There was a big gap of nearly 20 days. We can continue this at my talk page if you want. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that if @Toddy1 gets involved in this discussion as a not-involved user, the discussion will come to an end quickly. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok @Toddy1 thanks for the advice. I shall act accordingly in future. I closed them because last comment was three days before. Anyways Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

Hello Toddy1, i was wondering if you could help with a talk page archive bot that would possibly archive discussions in a day or two please (preferably a day), I'll keep an eye for the response. Thank you. shelovesneo (talk) 07:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the following to the archive bot configuration:
  • counter =1 [changed],
  • minthreadsleft =0 [changed],
  • minthreadstoarchive =1 [changed],
  • age of last thread in section before it is archived =15 days [unchanged].
I would expect the bot to archive some sections at some point in the next 36 hours. I will check to see if that happens.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was a second problem. Some archiving had been done to User talk:Shelovesneo/Archive 139. I have moved this to User talk:Shelovesneo/Archive 1. This fixes the problem that your archive header was not showing any archives.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Neo the Twin/Archive 139 is a redirect. I have changed the target to User talk:Shelovesneo/Archive 1. I have blanked User talk:Shelovesneo/Archive 139. Do you want me to request a speedy delete for User talk:Shelovesneo/Archive 139?-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added signatures to unsigned posts in two sections. Archive bots need posts to be signed so that they can work out whether to archive the section or not.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It worked.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Toddy1, thank you mate. shelovesneo (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Das Kathiababa's register has been attached with ample references today.

Santa Das Kathiababa's register has been attached with ample references today.

Why are you repeatedly trying to delete this registration even though there are enough references in these registrations Srabanta Deb (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]