Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Campbell

Anthony Campbell

A stub about a physician. The article provides no reason to think he's notable in any way (other than having once expressed an opinion). Lee Hunter 15:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: nn, bordering on speedy. David Mestel^(Talk) 15:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Article was started 4 hours ago. And the nominator admits this is a WP:POINT violation here. While it doesn't have much yet, there seems to be plenty of material on him we can use, as a simple google search for "Anthony Campbell homeopathy" will show. Adam Cuerden ^talk 16:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator admits no such thing! Yes please do a Google search. There's nothing more than a few thousand hits. He has a few obscure pop medicine publications, some of them not much more substantial than pamphlets. As far as I can tell, he's virtually unknown within his field and completely unknown outside of it. He doesn't seem to be cited by anyone as far as I can tell. The very definition of a minor figure in alternative healthcare. --Lee Hunter 19:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pending addition of sources. This nomination is a pretty egregious WP:POINT violation based on arguments at Talk:George Vithoulkas and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Vithoulkas. I would like to see non-crufty reliable sources demonstrating this individual's notability, but as the article is very new I realize that they may be forthcoming. Skinwalker 17:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pending addition of sources. as Skinwalker. Further bio info to be forthcoming. .. dave souza, talk 18:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]