Talk:2024 South African general election

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

South Africa: Politics Start‑class High‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the South African politics task force.

Infobox

Number 57 Here we can start a discussion rather than reverts back and forth. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 23:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, always happy to discuss when people follow WP:BRD. The splitting of the infobox is simply unnecessary IMO. Please could you stop forcing it back in? Cheers, Number 5 7 08:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Multi-Party Charter should be shown somehow/somewhat in the infobox. The way I did it I think is best (especially since its been done in other pages like the 2022 Italian general election), but if you have any other ideas/suggestions. I'm open to hear it. But leaving it how it is now I think doesn't suffice. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 22:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it needs showing in the infobox. The Italian example is different because the alliances actually ran as a single unit in the FPTP element of the elections. Cheers, Number 5 7 08:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Independence edits

Cape Independence is not even relevant to this page considering the absence of other special sections regarding the other political parties. Considering there are more relevant parties too than Cape Independence, it doesn't belong here and it's obviously being posted for propaganda reasons. 165.73.64.6 (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure of the relevance for other reasons, but the reason you state here and the edit summary for your last edits are not good reasons for the removal of sourced information. The fact that other information is not present is not a sufficient reason to removed something else. Beach drifter (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]