Jump to content

Talk:Atezolizumab

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 02:46, 26 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Pharmacology}}, {{WikiProject Medicine}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Should we mention cost here and or in PD-L1 inhibitors ?

[edit]

Roche therapy helps 24 percent of untreated bladder cancer patients: study says "At a list price of $12,500 per month, Tecentriq costs roughly the same as [PD-1 inhibitors] Keytruda and Bristol's rival Opdivo" - Should we mention cost here and /or in PD-L1 inhibitors ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Compared with docetaxel chemotherapy

[edit]

Immunotherapy drug gives non-small-cell lung cancer patients extra four months of life with fewer side effects compared to chemotherapy (or the Lancet source) could be mentioned. - Rod57 (talk) 13:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should distinguish the similar OAK and POPLAR trials PD-L1 Inhibitor Wins NSCLC Indication - Rod57 (talk) 13:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EU approval

[edit]

Also now approved (full/unconditional?) for "two types of metastatic bladder cancer" says [1] - Need EU RS - Rod57 (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No confirmatory evidence for FDA approvals

[edit]

According to FDA says Tecentriq won't lose its bladder cancer nod despite phase 3 failure, Roche reports - Lets see what the FDA say. - Rod57 (talk) 14:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

This article should explain why this drug is named what it is. 2A04:4A43:572F:E992:0:0:2272:ABC8 (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]