User talk:IdLoveOne
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. IdLoveOne has not edited Wikipedia since June 24, 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Wrong closure at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Alexz Johnson
[edit]See my tally there. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I think you should close it according to what the numbers actually say, not re-open it for further comments while leaving the picture in a promoted state. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I only did that so that in case people came back to specify their general supports (which they rarely seem to do anyway) I could just shift the images in all the closure pages if the revised count turned out to be in favor of one of the edits, and BTW it was clearly the number that started this new controversy on that image. --I'ḏ♥One 16:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Let me make it absolutely clear to you that this is not about my preferred picture - it's about your wrong choice. Please fix it. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- And I have already made it absolutely positively clear that the vote was 8 for the original versus 4 to the one you keep insisting on and 2 other users agreed. --I'ḏ♥One 09:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Let me make it absolutely clear to you that this is not about my preferred picture - it's about your wrong choice. Please fix it. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- I only did that so that in case people came back to specify their general supports (which they rarely seem to do anyway) I could just shift the images in all the closure pages if the revised count turned out to be in favor of one of the edits, and BTW it was clearly the number that started this new controversy on that image. --I'ḏ♥One 16:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Can I ask why you put that in US history? The picture is being used to illustrate him, and, as was suggested uncontroversially in the nom, it should really be in People/Entertainment... J Milburn (talk) 12:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- And I've just seen Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ambondro mahabo, which does not belong in biology. It is used to illustrate the mammal genus/species, not some abstract biological concept. Again, mammals was uncontroversially suggested in the nom. J Milburn (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's not an animal, it's only an especially small fragment of what was once an animal and arguably not even a very major part of its body; A jawbone can't illustrate a whole animal, unless maybe you're a forensic scientist, even though that's the image used in the infobox. I put it in biology because that section contains far more images of examples of anatomy than Animals (presumably mammals) does, which has more images of full creatures which is how it should be. The Charlton Heston photo doesn't show him doing anything for an entertainment purpose, he's attending and presumably supporting a historic movement. It's true people remember him mainly for his acting, but the picture shows a different aspect of his life. --I'ḏ♥One 16:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Look, the point is that these images are being used to show those things. The jaw fragment is being used to show the animal (it's all we have of the animal) and the Heston photograph is being used to show him. Further, as I said, both were listed as the category in the nom, and were completely unchallenged. The first (although it happened years ago) is not illustrating anything historical, it's illustrating the person, and the second, though it shows a piece of an animla and not a whole animal, is not illustrating anything related to biology, it's illustrating the animal. J Milburn (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Could we have this fixed now, please? J Milburn (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Look, the point is that these images are being used to show those things. The jaw fragment is being used to show the animal (it's all we have of the animal) and the Heston photograph is being used to show him. Further, as I said, both were listed as the category in the nom, and were completely unchallenged. The first (although it happened years ago) is not illustrating anything historical, it's illustrating the person, and the second, though it shows a piece of an animla and not a whole animal, is not illustrating anything related to biology, it's illustrating the animal. J Milburn (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- It's not an animal, it's only an especially small fragment of what was once an animal and arguably not even a very major part of its body; A jawbone can't illustrate a whole animal, unless maybe you're a forensic scientist, even though that's the image used in the infobox. I put it in biology because that section contains far more images of examples of anatomy than Animals (presumably mammals) does, which has more images of full creatures which is how it should be. The Charlton Heston photo doesn't show him doing anything for an entertainment purpose, he's attending and presumably supporting a historic movement. It's true people remember him mainly for his acting, but the picture shows a different aspect of his life. --I'ḏ♥One 16:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:2099725 FreightElevator 135.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:2099725 FreightElevator 135.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Makeemlighter (talk) 10:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Your valued picture nomination was promoted
[edit] |
Pitched
[edit]Hiya! Thanks for your comment at Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Valverde pitching motion! I'm very unfamiliar with the image recognition process here, where do I start? Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Just go to WP:VPC, scroll down and there should be a text box in the information section. Just make up a name for the nomination URL extension or use the filename of the image. When you click enter the next page should tell you everything else you have to do, then just copy-paste the whole URL inside of {{ }} and add it to the top of the nomination section of Valued pic candidates, it'll link all the information and people will vote. =) --I'ḏ♥One 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
PPR for Seven Pillars of Wisdom
[edit]Hi! Thank you for your comment posted at the PPR. As there were three seconders, I moved the Seven Pillars of Wisdom to FAC.--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:30, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Glad to see such a nice picture got promoted! I'm not on WP quite as much these days, so sorry for not voting. --I'ḏ♥One 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
Valued Picture Barnstar | |
| Thank you for all you have done for Valued Picture Spongie555 (talk) 04:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC) |
- Thanks! =) TBH I've been feeling pretty pessimistic about VPC's future. --I'ḏ♥One 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually it seems like things have picked up! =) --I'ḏ♥One 18:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes things are getting better. Also are you done closing the pope and the ocean nomination beacuse you didn't send the message to say it was promoted. Spongie555 (talk) 21:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done! Not in order, but.. --I'ḏ♥One 22:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes things are getting better. Also are you done closing the pope and the ocean nomination beacuse you didn't send the message to say it was promoted. Spongie555 (talk) 21:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Actually it seems like things have picked up! =) --I'ḏ♥One 18:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I am sorry about this, I don't check regularly my page on Commons and I just discovered this discussion. I don't know if it is useful to answer the questions now... Anyway, I took the original picture of the cast in Museum national d'histoire naturelle of Paris and then I just modified the background with photoshop. The bones are in their position just as they are shown in the museum... Best regards, I20 (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Credit info for image
[edit]Hi, I'd like to use some of your symbols on my website for an article I'm posting on astrology, but I'm not sure what name to credit it with? Would you please email me and let me know what name you would like credited?
This is the site they would appear on: http://www.inspirationz.info/
Much appreciated.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysticdreaming (talk • contribs)
- Which ones? --I'ḏ♥One 03:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
VPC passed
[edit]Template:AstrAri
Template:AstrAri has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrTau
Template:AstrTau has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrGem
Template:AstrGem has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrCan
Template:AstrCan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrLeo
Template:AstrLeo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrVir
Template:AstrVir has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrLib
Template:AstrLib has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrSco
Template:AstrSco has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrSag
Template:AstrSag has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrCap
Template:AstrCap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrAqu
Template:AstrAqu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AstrPis
Template:AstrPis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Great. I just got back online a few days ago... -sigh- --I'ḏ♥One 20:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]Merry Christmas
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Extra999 (talk) at 04:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC).
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Pig Faced Lady of Manchester Square and the Spanish Mule of Madrid 2
[edit]Hey, seeing as you were involved in the last nomination of this image, I thought you may be interested to know that I have renominated it. J Milburn (talk) 20:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pauliyas Hongkong.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Pauliyas Hongkong.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
FP nomination of Les Demoiselles d'Avignon
[edit]Hi IdLoveOne. I just wanted to inform you that Les Demoiselles d'Avignon is up for Featured picture again. The nomination can be found here. I am informing you as you have previously participated in a Featured Picture review of this image, here. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
Speedy deletion nomination of File:2006 Quarter Proof.png[edit]A tag has been placed on File:2006 Quarter Proof.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( A tag has been placed on File:4th FW Strike Eagles assist shuttle launch.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( A tag has been placed on File:Amphianthus sp. (Colonial gorgonian wrapper anemones.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:Army-fgm148.jpg[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Army-fgm148.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:Banana and cross section.jpg[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Banana and cross section.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wtc-2004-memorial.jpg[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Wtc-2004-memorial.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:WTC smoking on 9-11.jpeg[edit]A tag has been placed on File:WTC smoking on 9-11.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:Trumpet 1.jpg[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Trumpet 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( A tag has been placed on File:Tribute in Light Memorial September 9 2004.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:Newtons cradle animation book 2.gif[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Newtons cradle animation book 2.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Speedy deletion nomination of File:Motherhood and apple pie.jpg[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Motherhood and apple pie.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( |
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bengal Tiger in Bangalore.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Bengal Tiger in Bangalore.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Biological cell.svg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Biological cell.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Black Tape for a Blue Girl by Kyle Cassidy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Blue crab on market in Piraeus - Callinectes sapidus Rathbun 20020819-317.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Blue crab on market in Piraeus - Callinectes sapidus Rathbun 20020819-317.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Blue Linckia Starfish.JPG
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Blue Linckia Starfish.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Brown-Falcon,-Vic,-3.1.2008.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Brown-Falcon,-Vic,-3.1.2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bufo marinus from Australia.JPG
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Bufo marinus from Australia.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Buzz salutes the U.S. Flag.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Buzz salutes the U.S. Flag.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cabbage and cross section on white.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Cabbage and cross section on white.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:24, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Canada goose gosling - natures pics.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Canada goose gosling - natures pics.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Carpenter bee head and compound eyes.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Carpenter bee head and compound eyes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Caspian Sea from orbit.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Caspian Sea from orbit.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Coconut Palm flowers.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Coconut Palm flowers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 02:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:UA Flight 175 hits WTC south tower 9-11 edit.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
WP:Astrology project would like your views on what constitutes appropriate content and sources for astrology-related content
[edit]Hi, this is to let you know that there is an important discussion taking place in the WP:Astrology project, which affects the guidelines for content and sources on astrology-related pages. This requires input from its members. It would be very much appreciated if you could leave a comment/express your views on the issues raised.
The link to the discussion is here.
Hope you can find time to add a few thoughts
Thank you, -- Zac Δ talk! 14:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hello,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Atlantic Spadefish PLW edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 16, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-03-16. —howcheng {chat} 07:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Template:Image Gallery
[edit]Hi, your personal opinion would be greatly appreciated here IdLoveOne. We all thank you, Krenakarore TK 01:24, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
FP delist nomination
[edit]Just wanted to let you know that a Featured picture that you nominated is being discussed for delisting at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Atlantic Spadefish PLW edit.jpg.
File:David Schwimmer Jul 2005 London, England Crop&blurNo2.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Schwimmer Jul 2005 London, England Crop&blurNo2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 02:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi there,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Hevea semillas2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 2, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-05-02. —howcheng {chat} 16:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi there,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Notocactus minimus.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 6, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-05-06. —howcheng {chat} 20:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Like-engirding for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Like-engirding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Like-engirding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MakeSense64 (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
The article Aversion (astrology) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced since 2009. Fails GNG to be worthy of a standalone article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakeSense64 (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Matt Bomer Infobox photo consensus discussion
[edit]Hi. Your opinion is requested in this discussion.
If you're in an area that was affected by Hurricane Sandy, and are unable to reply, I hope that you have not suffered too greatly, and my best wishes go out to you. Nightscream (talk) 22:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the Chaldean Astroglyphs
[edit]Thanks for posting that table and making it public domain. I just used it in a post on my website: http://venusianskyastrology.com/2012/12/05/approaching-dystopia-visions-of-december-21-2012/
Best,
Anne — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.198.106.216 (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Centaurs in astrology for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centaurs in astrology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centaurs in astrology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of List of asteroids in astrology for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of asteroids in astrology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of asteroids in astrology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:21, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:432planes1.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:AstrologicalGlyphs-AsteroidsChaldean.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gilbert Stuart Williamstown Portrait of George Washington.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Gilbert Stuart Williamstown Portrait of George Washington.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Spice Goddess for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spice Goddess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spice Goddess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 06:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
The file File:No free image, click here.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
The article Extreme Cuisine with Jeff Corwin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No good sources found
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
The article 5 Ingredient Fix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Has been a single sentence since day one, no sourcing found
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Judie Byrd's Kitchen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable show, sources are broken, nothing better found
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)