Talk:Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
A news item involving Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 16 December 2019. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Bibliography
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- Bhavnani, Nandita (2016). "Unwanted Refugees: Sindhi Hindus in India and Muhajirs in Sindh". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 39 (4): 790–804. doi:10.1080/00856401.2016.1230691. S2CID 151584378.
- Kudaisya, Gyanesh (2006). "Divided Landscapes, Fragmented Identities: East Bengal Refugees and Their Rehabilitation in India, 1947–79". Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 17 (1): 24–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.1996.tb00082.x. ISSN 0129-7619.
- Nakatani, Tetsuya (2000), "Away from Home : The Movement and Settlement of Refugees from East Pakistan in West Bengal, India", Journal of the Japanese Association for South Asian Studies, 12: 73–, doi:10.11384/jjasas1989.2000.7 (inactive 2022-06-26)
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of June 2022 (link) - Roy, Haimanti (2013), Partitioned Lives: Migrants, Refugees, Citizens in India and Pakistan, 1947-65, OUP India, ISBN 978-0-19-808177-7
- Roy, Rituparna (Summer 2009), "The Hungry Tide – Bengali Hindu refugees in the Subcontinent (Review)" (PDF), The Study (51)
- Bhattacharjee, Saurabh (1 March 2008), "India Needs a Refugee Law", Economic and Political Weekly, 43 (9): 71–75, JSTOR 40277209
- Scheel, Stephan; Squire, Vicki (2014), "Forced Migrants as 'Illegal' Migrants", in Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh; Gil Loescher; Katy Long; Nando Sigona (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, OUP Oxford, pp. 188–, ISBN 978-0-19-164587-7
- Poddar, Mihika (2018), "The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016: international law on religion-based discrimination and naturalisation law", Indian Law Review, 2 (1): 108–118, doi:10.1080/24730580.2018.1512290, S2CID 158325181
- Sadiq, Kamal (2008), Paper Citizens: How Illegal Immigrants Acquire Citizenship in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-970780-5
- Saikia, N.; Joe, W.; Saha, A.; Chutia, U. (2016), Cross Border Migration in Assam during 1951-2011: Process, Magnitude, and Socio-Economic Consequences (PDF), Delhi: Indian Council of Social Science Research
- Sarker, Shuvro Prosun (2017), Refugee Law in India: The Road from Ambiguity to Protection, Springer, ISBN 978-981-10-4807-4
- Shamshad, Rizwana (2017), Bangladeshi Migrants in India: Foreigners, Refugees, or Infiltrators?, OUP India, ISBN 978-0-19-909159-1
Expanding the "International reactions" section of the article
While the "International reactions" section of this article was interesting, I think it can be improved by a discussion of the implications of the international response to the CAA. Seeing all of the different country's responses is useful, but synthesizing overall responses and adding discussion and analysis would be useful.
Haakad1 (talk) 22:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC) Haakad1 (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: India in Global Studies
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2023 and 14 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Haakad1 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Devangjhabakh, PranavRamesh2478.
— Assignment last updated by Adirrao (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Not mentioned, vs. Excluded
About the paragraph headed "Exclusion of Other Persecuted Minorities": Groups that are not mentioned cannot be said to be excluded. After all, they are not specifically excluded based on specific criteria, and hundreds of other minorities are not mentioned. Suggest changing the heading to "Other Persecuted Minorities". 23:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Sooku (talk) 23:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- We use the language that reliable sources used when discussing this law, and to my knowledge such sources largely call it an exclusion. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Not said explicitly who are EXCLUDED
Law never said who are excluded, but talks about communities that are covered under this law. So highlighting that 'Muslim are excluded' is WP:SYNTHESIS : this applies to 'not grant citizen to ATHEIST in these countries. So removed from the lead. Afv12e (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is written by summarising reliable sources. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- why don't you add atheists there? Afv12e (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- As Kautilya said, we summarize what reliable sources say about the topic. The exclusion of Muslims, including persecuted Muslim minorities, is mentioned prominently by the overwhelming majority of sources; the exclusion of atheists is not. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- why don't you add atheists there? Afv12e (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Consensus for lead
Regarding this edit
■ "The law does not grant such eligibility to Muslims from these countries." - isn't it apparent from the preceeding sentences ie " It amended the Citizenship Act, 1955 by providing an accelerated pathway to Indian citizenship for persecuted religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan who arrived in India by 2014. The eligible minorities were stated as Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis or Christians." As I noted here, it need not to overstate as it is apparent from the preceding sentences. This law gives citizenship to minorities from muslim countries; Muslims are not minorities in those Muslim majority/ Islamic republics such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh.
I think after clarifying this we can move on to other edits I've done on this article's lead. Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of High-importance
- C-Class Indian politics articles
- High-importance Indian politics articles
- C-Class Indian politics articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian politics articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Mid-importance Islam-related articles
- C-Class Muslim history articles
- Unknown-importance Muslim history articles
- Muslim history task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Mid-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report