Talk:Narluga
Appearance
Cetaceans (inactive) | ||||
|
Wiki Education assignment: ECOL 4950- Senior Seminar
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GreenJadeNeocaridina (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ecokelbells, Ecogirly2001.
— Assignment last updated by Branchiobdellid (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Why does this need to be separate from Monodontidae, which only consists of two species anyway? FunkMonk (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- The family article has much more to discuss that just the hybrid. Or do you really want to just merge the hybrid article into the family article? - UtherSRG (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- The family article could be much longer, sure, but I don't see why this entire narluga article couldn't just be a section in the family article. It's basically about a single specimen, it's not a recurring hybrid. But to make matters worse, this article seems to be bloated by what is largely WP:synth. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I say take a machete to the OR first and see what's left. At that point, yes, probably merge into the family article. (Current merge tags don't indicate in which direction...) - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like some of that text could actually be useful for general sections in the family article, as it talks about both species. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Cool. Let's give this a week or so for others to weigh in, now that the articles have the merge tags, but I think this is a slam dunk. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should stay separate like Ligon. Hmwith (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cool. Let's give this a week or so for others to weigh in, now that the articles have the merge tags, but I think this is a slam dunk. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like some of that text could actually be useful for general sections in the family article, as it talks about both species. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- I say take a machete to the OR first and see what's left. At that point, yes, probably merge into the family article. (Current merge tags don't indicate in which direction...) - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- The family article could be much longer, sure, but I don't see why this entire narluga article couldn't just be a section in the family article. It's basically about a single specimen, it's not a recurring hybrid. But to make matters worse, this article seems to be bloated by what is largely WP:synth. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)