Jump to content

Talk:Narluga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hmwith (talk | contribs) at 15:24, 4 May 2024 (Wiki Education assignment: ECOL 4950- Senior Seminar: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconCetaceans (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cetaceans, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Wiki Education assignment: ECOL 4950- Senior Seminar

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GreenJadeNeocaridina (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ecokelbells, Ecogirly2001.

— Assignment last updated by Branchiobdellid (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The family article could be much longer, sure, but I don't see why this entire narluga article couldn't just be a section in the family article. It's basically about a single specimen, it's not a recurring hybrid. But to make matters worse, this article seems to be bloated by what is largely WP:synth. FunkMonk (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I say take a machete to the OR first and see what's left. At that point, yes, probably merge into the family article. (Current merge tags don't indicate in which direction...) - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like some of that text could actually be useful for general sections in the family article, as it talks about both species. FunkMonk (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Let's give this a week or so for others to weigh in, now that the articles have the merge tags, but I think this is a slam dunk. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should stay separate like Ligon. Hmwith (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]