User talk:Shoot for the Stars

You can do it!

Panini! has given you some kittens! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companions forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else some kittens, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kittens}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.

Panini! • 🥪 04:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Panini! Thanks a lot bro. I honestly could not have tried again without your support and mentorship. It truly means a lot. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Unban appeal

Deepfriedokra I have worked on my appeal. It is below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Shoot for the Stars (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am wanting to appeal my ban implemented in August 2021, nearly three years ago. At the time of my ban, I was still a teenager in high school. My main mistake was uploading low-quality images, many of which were mugshots. Despite repeated advice and warnings from different users, I ignored them and continued to upload these images. Almost three years later and through my current studies in the US criminal justice system at college, I realize that these mugshots can unjustly criminalize individuals, which can potentially damage their reputations (WP:MUG). Another significant factor in my ban was my behavior back in 2019, when I was just 16 years old. I repeatedly added fabricated music album covers to articles, again ignoring explicit instructions from editors not to do so. A lot of editors tried to (WP:assume good faith), but I consistently persisted my disruptive actions. My biggest problem was that I didn't have any (WP:COMPETENCE) when it came to Wikipedia's policies. And because of how uninitiated I was of the rules and couldn't accept them, I was banned by the community. Following my ban, instead of trying to stay away and contribute to other projects, I engaged in (WP:Sockpuppetry), using only these two accounts: user:TheCleanestBestPleasure and user:Beatlesfan210. I also engaged in sockpuppetry by using various IP addresses. During my previous unban request a year ago, it was pointed out by another user that I had created several articles on Simple Wikipedia that broke the (WP:BLP) policy. While I initially believed these individuals to be notable under (WP:Notability) based on the sources I found, I was told by Simple Wikipedia admin Ferien that they were not notable and didn't apply to (WP:BLP1E). I want to clarify that my intentions from creating these articles were never meant to be malicious; I was honestly unaware of these specific guidelines until they were explicitly explained to me. Additionally, the same user brought up that throughout late 2022 to early 2023, I submitted more than ten (WP:UTRS) appeals, highlighting a concern that my issues off-wiki were not resolved. I want to admit that during this period, I struggled significantly with impulse control, and instead of stopping and taking a (WP:Wikibreak), I continued to do these disruptive actions. Following that, the comments from opposers left me feeling very discouraged. I was so stressed from it I made the decision to request a self-block on both Simple Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, needing a break to focus on myself. During that time, I maintained communication with Panini! off-wiki. Panini! has served as a mentor to me, providing guidance, insight into what I did wrong that lead to my ban, and offered constructive feedback about what I should do. Panini! is an excellent editor and has truly helped me realize my mistakes. I then realized the user on my appeal last year was right. I truly didn't understand the extent of my disruptive behavior. I took a break from creating BLP articles until I truly knew the rules better and limited myself to submitting only one UTRS appeal in the past year, specifically to request access to my talk page for the purpose of this appeal. I want to acknowledge that my actions in the past were not in line with Wikipedia's policies and standards. At the time, I was a young, naive teenager not fully understanding just how disruptive my behavior was towards Wikipedia. My understanding was limited, and I failed to stop when others told me I was disruptive. Since then, with guidance from more experienced editors and a deeper dive into Wikipedia's policies, I continued to edit at Simple English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, learning way more about the guidelines, like what makes an article notable for BLP. I am open to any questions regarding my incompetency back then as well as what I can do to improve. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Successful community ban appeal, showcasing an overwhelming consensus to unblock (AN permalink) — welcome back! El_C 14:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Hearty endorse, statement pending. Panini! • 🥪 05:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Panini!: Carrying over.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Link to discussion -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• Welcome back, and shoot for the stars! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt It's good to hear from you and good to be back! Crazy to think that it has been almost three years! Time flies by when you become an adult lol. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Welcome back to enwiki :) --Ferien (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks bro! It feels great to be back! Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Good job

With the Elliot Rodger article. I feel like now it successfully justifies its own existence apart from the main page (and has improved the main one, which is now more focused). Good job :) PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

I really appreciate it. I made sure to find the highest quality sources and information for the Elliot Rodger article. The main page was also just missing a lot of important info. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 02:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

I read the whole article, which I rarely do because they're boring. Great work here! Fascinating to see the deep film affiliation his story is involved, and also the fact that one of my favorite musicians went to the same school as him. A really good read overall. I don't have too many comments, mainly just recommendations for puffery that can be easily swooped up in a copyedit. I recommend WP:GOCE if you go any further (not that it's needed per se, but I always go the GOCE route for any article I have big plans for).

I'm impressed you were able to pull this one off! This is not only a difficult subject matter, but it also seems to be quite volatile among editors in the background. Don't be afraid to reach out to me in the future if you receive pushback you feel is unjust; remember, it's best to avoid as much general debate as possible, and it's best to formalize it right away. Panini! • 🥪 00:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Panini! I really appreciate the feedback! To be honest, being part of Gen Z, everyone around my age or younger started doing these weird trends like mewing. I looked it up and saw that people my age were saying Incel slang, so I researched further and saw that all of this happened because of Elliot Rodger and his killings. Being a criminal justice major, Rodger and the reasons for killing 6 innocent people just made me very intrigued and I never knew someone could go that far like he did. I have been seeing boys as young as in Elementary school children say and incel things. It's a really scary thing honestly. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Also, thanks for the suggestion on GOCE! I completely forgot about that. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Mary Scheer photo

Just wanted to thank you for changing the lead image at Mary Scheer. That picture of her was really awful and I'm glad someone took the initiative to change it. <3 benǝʇᴉɯ 22:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Elliot Rodger (Elliot Mogger)

Could you explain how that was unreliable? People on TikTok call him Elliot Mogger, how does the search leading to the videos of him being called Elliot Mogger not support that fact? MotoMottor (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

MotoMottor You have no reliable sources saying people call him that. You need reliable news articles that show he is called that. If you continue to add it to the article without sources, I will report you to an admin. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Luigi NSMBUDX.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Luigi NSMBUDX.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Elliot Rodger

Hi Shoot for the Stars, while working on this article, I note there are a lot of excess citations, particularly in the first two sections. I've noted passages with more than three citations with the [excessive citations] template. You might like to either bundle them or to remove some citations, with a preference for the highest-quality sources, and others could be added to the talk page. Please note I haven't reviewed any of these sources for either content or reliability. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 01:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)