User talk:Macrobreed2

This is Macrobreed2's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

You can type your message here regarding any issue with my edits or any requests for article creation. I will try to reply here.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maheep Singh (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maheep Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HitroMilanese, Thanks for highlighting the issues in Draft:Maheep Singh. I would see if other reliable sources exist and add them. Regards Macrobreed2 (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Poornima University

added links pointing to Urban and University Grants Commission

JECRC University

added a link pointing to Urban

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A note to other users - I have fixed the above mentioned disambiguation links. Macrobreed2 (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahgir (singer) (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bhairava7 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

He didn't receive any accolandes in his music career and where is the link of Creators awards that you mention in the Infobox and I don't believe the this biography is currently not notable under WP:SINGER and they didn't cross the boderline of WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahgir (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Macrobreed2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiladitya Chetia (October 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm really sorry, I just do not see the notability here.

Qcne (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Macrobreed2 please don't let this discourage you :) Qcne (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Qcne, Thank you so much for your kind words! I appreciate your encouragement and support. I will continue to work on improving other drafts and articles :-) Macrobreed2 (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brooke Bond Taj Mahal Tea House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Mary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on Draft:Razorpay

Hi. Thanks very much for the work you’ve done on the draft. Through no fault of yours, the draft you worked on is an old version and very flawed. I’ve done dozens of hours of work to improve it on my Sandbox. I have been speaking with some very senior Wikipedia editors to ensure everything I do complies with Wikipedia policy, and most importantly, prominently features articles that show editors the page meets notability standards. As I disclosed on the Sandbox, I have a COI as an employee of Razorpay. I think I can reconcile the two versions, using the best of your work. For the time being, I’ve removed the original draft from the AfC queue. I hope you don’t mind. I’ve been very meticulous about sourcing and am being extremely conservative in the language to avoid any WP:PROMO. I’ve spent a lot of time looking at WP:GA to learn from model articles. I am concerned some of what you’ve added, like a table with all financing rounds, is not typical of pages about companies and might be considered promotional or excessive detail. This page has been declined 5 times already and if it gets declined again, it could be blacklisted. Even after I substantially cut back on the page and added more high quality sources, an AfC editor declined it on my Sandbox. One of India’s largest private companies won’t have a Wikipedia page if there is not a lot of caution taken in the next submission. It seems safest to try to get a very well-sourced, modest page approved first. Then other editors like you can build on the page if they want and it won’t result in the page being blacklisted. Would you mind if I spend a few days reconciling the versions on my sandbox? Then I will post another note and you can leave me comments before I post this at AfC. Thank you! Kinleysoda (talk) 17:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]