Jump to content

Talk:Spider-Man in film

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Dimadick (talk | contribs) at 15:37, 28 October 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleSpider-Man in film has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 27, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 11, 2008Good topic candidateNot promoted
December 13, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
May 20, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
February 5, 2010Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

References to use

[edit]
Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
  • Booker, M. Keith (2007). "The Spider-Man film franchise". May Contain Graphic Material: Comic Books, Graphic Novels, and Film. Praeger. ISBN 0275993868.
  • Zakarin, Jordan (2012-08-30). "Charlie Sheen: I Tried to Play Spider-Man". The Hollywood Reporter.

Nomination of Spider-Man: Lotus for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spider-Man: Lotus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Spider-Man: Lotus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.