Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Goodnightmush (talk | contribs) at 15:26, 14 November 2024 (German: Declined – not enough recent disruptive activity (using responseHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Reason: I've previously asked for protection for this page here and was told to come back if more issues occured. Even though it's semi-protected it is still being contantly disruptied. I'm asking for extended confirmed protection not indefinite but at least for a month, maybe a bit after just in case they disrupt the article after the event has concluded. [1] [2] [3] [4]] [5] [6] If you need any more evidence to confirm anything please let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the other users you've reverted recently are also extended-confirmed; they wouldn't be affected. Are their edits the ones that you are referring to? Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edit warring on semi-protected article. In addition, there seems to be a high level of COI edits from users who previously engaged in a pattern of disruptive edits. Despite previous discussions about notability, the same issues continue to resurface, creating an unproductive cycle of content removal and restoration. The editors' actions appear to be WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior rather than constructive editing. (see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/15.ai/1).

I plan to clean up the article after it has been protected, as per WP:BOLD. HackerKnownAs (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: So you want extended-confirmed protection? Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that would be good, especially if the protection can be added indefinitely (since this article has been extended-confirmed protected multiple times and it still sees a large amount of vandalism and edit warring to this day). Out of curiosity, is it also possible to add a protection against specific users that have been participating in WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior rather than constructive editing? HackerKnownAs (talk) 14:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, but we have Wikipedia:Partial blocks which, imho, are somewhat less used than they should be. Lectonar (talk) 14:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lot of vandalism is keep updating every day. 136.233.9.4 (talk) 05:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Mfarazbaig are constantly edit warring to restore the article. - Ratnahastin (talk) 06:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. The article appears to be getting a lot of attention from IPs and non-EC accounts at the moment for some reason resulting in WP:ARBECR violation ping-pong. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/A-I. Favonian (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am not sure they pass the notability threshold, though. Lectonar (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article is continually subject to the addition of unsourced content by numerous anonymous IPs. This is maybe the same editor and someone who has a close connection with the subject but it happens on almost a daily basis. Egghead06 (talk) 08:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DoubleGrazing. Favonian (talk) 14:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs since the previous protection expired last week. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Changing the budget and box office without providing reliable sources. Charliehdb (talk) 13:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content, either protection or some kind of block is needed (am involved so can take no action myself). Thank you,. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IP block evasion. GSK (talkedits) 14:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A new user has been making repeated incorrect edits, which is causing confusion. Please consider enabling protection on the page temporarily to maintain accuracy. EngrShakamal (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 15:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has faced ongoing disruptions since August, involves election results related to living individuals. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of sourced content. ZLEA T\C 14:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Persistent edits by socks of Belugajdm, see SPI. Could do with 30/500 rather than semi. OXYLYPSE (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Renewing a request for semi-protection for Ismail al-Faruqi and a set of pages related to him due to chronic sockpuppetry and IP edit warring. Since the last request was declined, these pages have seen daily (and sometimes multiple daily) attempts by WP:LOUTSOCK IPs to restore material that was added by proven sockpuppets and removed pursuant to the sockpuppetry policy. (See SPI page.) In addition to Ismail al-Faruqi and for the same reason, I am renewing my request for semi-protection for:

Thank you! Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. C F A 💬 14:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip users and users with low edit counts are doing bad faith edits or are making edits thinking that they are doing the right thing but they are removing valid information

there is also ongoing edit wars on this page thats also another reason. best regards, Paytonisboss (talk) 15:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors removing photo and changing "husband" to "son". Schazjmd (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]