User Talk:Shaan Sengupta
| This is Shaan Sengupta's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
 | Shaan Sengupta is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
- If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
- If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Violation of topic ban
Hi, it seems you violated your topic ban by participating in an ANI thread concerning an Indian film as well as making references to India and Andhra Pradesh[1][2][3]. Note that once you are banned from a topic, you are not allowed to even talk about it, thanks. - Ratnahastin (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @RH. I know it, Pppery told me there. I way on the ANI when that came up. At first I was going to leave it only after telling the reporting user that they should inform the user they are complaining against at there TP as per rule. In doing that I thought of going through the article's TP to see if they have tried to discuss it and give my input only on behavioural grounds, which I did. But the curse word made me mention the article's TP there. And then I added the comment of present day.... later not realising that I was at wrong there. Regarding the sensitivity one, it just came out. I won't justify myself. I know I did wrong, though it was pure unintentional. But before I could realise, I had done already it. And when Pppery told me to disengage, I did that and didn't even reply to them. Once again I would apologise to the community. Sorry and Thank you. ShaanSenguptaTalk 17:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)