Jump to content

User talk:robertsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 20:19, 10 December 2024 (Archiving 5 discussion(s) to User talk:Robertsky/Archive 9) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your tireless contributions to this project. Happy editing! Maliner (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Maliner thank you! – robertsky (talk) 04:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query

[edit]

Hello, Robertsky,

I was looking at an AFD tagged by a new editor, Dmitry Bobriakov, and their User page states they are a member of English Wikipedia conflict of interest volunteer response team. I was unfamiliar with this group so I went to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Conflict of interest reports and saw your name listed so I'm coming to you. I was wondering if you could tell me more about this "team", who is on it and what it does. Thanks for any insight. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops! It looks like I already asked the editor about this on their User talk page back in October. But I'd still like to get your feedback on this. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz, the COIVRT team arose from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases/2024#April case, in which there were private information being used to investigate into a COI issue involving an admin. After the case, the COIVRT mailing list was established. Admins can apply to the ArbCom to access it and also work on the reports there. Other than applying for access, other admins holding CU rights and on the Arbcom as well may access it. As such, other than the 4 admins listed on the page, CUs and ArbCom members have access as well. If the ArbCom elections is in your favour, you will also have access.
If the COIVRT report warrants it, we may block accounts while tagging the block with [[ticket:2024xxx]] COIVRT or similar in the block log message. We don't do this often as this meant that whatever unblock decisions needed to be made, it will be restricted to only a few admins as the block decision is based on the correspondence.
To my knowledge, the editor in question is not a member of the team. The editor might have submitted reports via the email which may have been handled and closed before I came onboard recently. Their userpage stated that they are "a volunteer who together with the team..." (shortened for brevity) sounds about right as it can be read that they are interested in hunting down COI editors and then sending the reports over for the team to review, akin to an editor reporting suspected socks at SPI then the SPI clerks/admins/CUs work on the report or one working on persistent copyright infringements by others. It just sounds... fluffy (WP:PROMO much?). – robertsky (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fishes

[edit]

HI I see you did not implement my requested move for Yunnanilus nigromaculatus to Eonemachilus nigromaculatus. The relevant project WP:Fishes agreed in October this year that the taxonomy used in fish articles, for taxa below the level of order, should follow Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes. That is what I was doing in this case. I have re-requested the move.

Can you tell me why the original request was not implemented? Quetzal1964 (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quetzal1964 those are contested as seen at Special:Permalink/1261835653. I routinely clear out requests with no activity in the last three days as stale. However, I missed out on your latest comment it seems. If you don't mind, I will restore the previous requests since there's some activity discussion. – robertsky (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:13, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Typo slayer (14:16, 9 December 2024)

[edit]

Hi, i wanted to ask you how to upload profile image to someone's biography article. Like what are restrictions. Can i get the image from anywhere (news article or social media site) to upload? --Typo slayer (talk) 14:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Typo slayer If the subject is still alive, you will need to find a copyright-free or creative commons (by-sa) version and upload to c:Commons first, as we have a strict interpretation of what non-free content can be used at WP:NFCC. Therefore, you cannot just get from anywhere, but instead find specifically on Flickr or even YouTube. For example, Ix Shen, I cannot use his image from todayonline or his instagram, but it was possible to get an updated image via a podcast on YouTube as it is labelled with "Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)". If the subject is dead, and there is a already a copyright-free/cc-licensed image, the only way to replace it would be finding another copyright-free/cc-licensed image. – robertsky (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]