Gravina Island Bridge
The Gravina Island Bridge was a proposed bridge to replace the ferry that currently connects the city and borough of Ketchikan, Alaska (population 13,125 [1]) to the Ketchikan International Airport on Gravina Island. [1]
The project had been met with fierce opposition[2] and had been labeled the "Bridge to Nowhere" by some in the media. It was cited by Senator John McCain of Arizona and others as a paradigmatic example of pork barrel spending in the 2005 Transportation Equity Act.
Media coverage of the bridge issue had focused on the secondary purpose put forward by the State of Alaska's official documentation, that of providing road access to the Ketchikan International Airport and had called into question the document's declared primary purpose — to provide access to developable lands on Gravina Island.[3] Statistics show that Ketchikan's airport is the second largest in Southeast Alaska after Juneau International Airport accommodating over 200,000 passengers a year, while the ferry shuttles approximately a half million people in the same time period (as of December 2006) [4].
The ferry, which costs $5 per person plus $6 for the car (one way) [5], runs to the island every 30 minutes for most of the year. During the peak tourist season (May-September), a ferry runs every 15 minutes.
According to USA Today the bridge was to have been nearly as long as the Golden Gate Bridge and higher than the Brooklyn Bridge.[6] Ketchikan's primary industry is tourism, so the bridge had to have been tall enough to accommodate the cruise ships which frequent the Alaskan waters during the summer.
Republican Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska became the object of strong media criticism when in October 2005 he opposed diverting the Gravina and Knik Arm Bridge funds [7] to help aid recovery from Hurricane Katrina. In his speech on the senate floor, Stevens threatened to quit Congress if the funds were removed from his state.[8]
The US Congress dropped the specific allocation for the two bridges, but the amount of money appropriated to Alaska remained unchanged. Alaska's DOT is 'leaning' toward alternative ferry options citing bridge costs (August 2007), despite having received the funds from the Federal Government. [9].
The City of Ketchikan has already begun to develop roads and a small amount of infrastructure for the island's inhabitants. However, residents continue to seek funding for the Gravina Island span. [10].
The project was canceled on September 21, 2007 by Alaska's governor Sarah Palin.[11] The bridge was canceled over concerns of pork barrel spending and fiscal irresponsibility.
References
- ^ Taxpayers for Common Sense (2005-08-22). "$315 Million Bridge to Nowhere" (PDF). Retrieved 2006-11-06.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Clarren, Rebecca (2005-08-09). "A bridge to nowhere". Salon.com. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ "Ketchikan Gravina Island Access Project". Alaska DOT. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
- ^ Ketchikan airport and ferry statistics for December 2006
- ^ Airport Ferry Fees
- ^ Jans, Nick (2005-05-17). "Alaska thanks you". USA Today. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Stevens Vehemently Opposes Coburn Amendment to Eliminate Alaska Bridges
- ^ Ruskin, Liz (2005-10-21). "Stevens says he'll quit if bridge funds diverted". Anchorage Daily News. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ DOT 'leaning' toward ferries; cites bridge cost
- ^ Without earmark, Ketchikan bridge project going nowhere
- ^ http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_6960001?nclick_check=1