User talk:Savignac

African diaspora

1. Calm down. One revert is not an insult to your mother or whatever. 2. I'm leaving it alone because I honestly don't have the time. So do whatever you guys agree with. CJ 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So if it was convenient, you would engage in an edit war? Nice revelation! Savignac 02:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you seriously need to calm down and stop making assumptions. I told you once that I was staying out of this issue. I've already stated my position. CJ 02:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My responses to your attitude are appropriate, considering the nature of your edits and the topics you circulate about. Apart from this particular part of the article that sounds outlandish, I'm not interested in race-related articles. The article presented a different tone than http://www.answers.com/miscegenation does, about race in North America, but the melting pot article also shows this side of the topic, that American demographics aren't "shades of gray", as the "love train" would have it, even if there has been admixture. Savignac 02:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from engaging in edit warring. You are editing against consensus and are introducing your own personal opinion into Wikipedia. Currently you are in breach of several Wikipedia policies and guidelines, namely.

I suggest you learn to accept that you cannot push your own opinion in Wikipedia, you need to verify your claims from reliable sources. If you cannot do this, then you have to accept what other reliable sources claim, even if you do not agree with these sources. There is such a thing as aaccepting you are wrong gracefully you know.

If you are not careful you will get blocked very soon for this sort of behaviour. All the best. Alun 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your remarks on the talk page

From your personality, I figure you WOULD include them, just to push your POV about racial miscegenation which is your political schadenfreude.

You think it's a turn of misfortune that white americans have black ancestry...? WOW. That is a very racist thing to say. I'm not even going to mince word about it. You're remarks are racist and you are wasting the time of editors who have better things to do without presenting any new information other than your own personal, unsupported, racist opinions. I thought I might have misunderstood the intent of you remarks earlier, but now I'm certain. I find your remarks hostile, degrading and uncivil. In the future please limit your discussion to the subject at hand. OK? futurebird 17:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Futurebird, I am related to blacks. They are my cousin-in-laws, while their mulatto children with my cousin are my dear kin. Don't you people dare question my love for them. I don't care if she's had a few different partners and not ever married, being a pregnant teenager in high school. I don't get in her face about the babies' daddies. I love them with all my heart. Yes, I also find "black is beautiful", but I don't need your frigging ass to tell me who to love!

I agree with futurebird. Keep it civil and relevant. Don't make ad hominem attacks, discuss the article and not the editor. Give reasons for the changes you want to make and back them up with reliable sources that support the point of view you want to introduce. Be civil and do not make racist comments like this one. Alun 18:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Futurebird is not right, because he is still making assumptions; don't kiss his ass with your false motives. You just want to be on his good side, because you are a conniving white liberal who would never listen to the concerns of an ethnic minority, just tell them some Kipling thing about how it's up to your own white ass to make them happy and successful, while trying to turn blacks against your political enemies, the white conservatives. Dirty, dirty worm politics in your backstabbing self. I don't need your divisive POV pushing to try and "teach a lesson" to "ignorant and backwards white Americans" about their "false whitehood". Would you like me to "rob" you of your British/Anglo-Welsh heritage, by saying that it doesn't exist, even though you are very conscious of it, as well as the Nordic blend of your children? It would be offensive and intrusive, wouldn't it? So why set a double standard, for you to preach your infallible faith in "socialistic progressive science" about other people who "just have to take it like a man", holding their ankles and bending over like a fairy? Savignac 06:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on African diaspora. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Rjd0060 06:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not "attacking" anybody. Nice try. I am simply reminding you and another user of a policy that exists here, which is 3RR. - Rjd0060 06:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]