User talk:Savignac
African diaspora
1. Calm down. One revert is not an insult to your mother or whatever. 2. I'm leaving it alone because I honestly don't have the time. So do whatever you guys agree with. CJ 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- So if it was convenient, you would engage in an edit war? Nice revelation! Savignac 02:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I think you seriously need to calm down and stop making assumptions. I told you once that I was staying out of this issue. I've already stated my position. CJ 02:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
My responses to your attitude are appropriate, considering the nature of your edits and the topics you circulate about. Apart from this particular part of the article that sounds outlandish, I'm not interested in race-related articles. The article presented a different tone than http://www.answers.com/miscegenation does, about race in North America, but the melting pot article also shows this side of the topic, that American demographics aren't "shades of gray", as the "love train" would have it, even if there has been admixture. Savignac 02:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from engaging in edit warring. You are editing against consensus and are introducing your own personal opinion into Wikipedia. Currently you are in breach of several Wikipedia policies and guidelines, namely.
I suggest you learn to accept that you cannot push your own opinion in Wikipedia, you need to verify your claims from reliable sources. If you cannot do this, then you have to accept what other reliable sources claim, even if you do not agree with these sources. There is such a thing as aaccepting you are wrong gracefully you know.
If you are not careful you will get blocked very soon for this sort of behaviour. All the best. Alun 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on African diaspora. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Rjd0060 06:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I am not "attacking" anybody. Nice try. I am simply reminding you and another user of a policy that exists here, which is 3RR. - Rjd0060 06:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I was talking to Alun. Savignac 06:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- OK. I apologize for that. I don't know whats going on, and I am not going to involve myself any further in this. I just wanted to remind you both of a policy, to avoid blocking. - Rjd0060 06:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. All I know for sure is I am not going to be a part of this. - Rjd0060 07:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry if I have inadvertently dragged you through it more. I don't know though. Thanks. Savignac 07:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can get to wub you too, you know. ;p See my comment to you on my talk page. Wub, ~Jeeny (talk) 07:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)