Jump to content

Talk:Glosa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 98.27.171.83 (talk) at 22:22, 3 January 2008 (MINOR EDIT -sorry, other edit was not correct in format. Fixed. Once again, this page is not a stub.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconConstructed languages Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

pre-merged comments

BUT WHY?!

I quote: "(In my personal opinion this way is not only interesting, but also the best for an auxlang.)" Wikipedia is not the place for "personal opinions".--Carabinieri 11:27, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Should definitely be merged with Glosa! It's the same language afterall. Anyway, they both read like ad-copy. (Most isolasting my foot.) --Kaleissin 18:57, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you are talking about this being the Interglossa page, then it has. I know this is a little bit late for a response. 98.27.171.83 (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently rewriting this article to avoid copyright violation/disputes. Help is appreciated. 76.188.26.92 (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the rewrite was deemed acceptable and the subpage contents have been moved to the main article page. I also renamed this section from "New Article" to "Responding to Copyright Notice" in order to be more precise and appropriate. 98.27.171.83 (talk) 22:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]