Jump to content

Chiropractic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 64.25.184.27 (talk) at 01:23, 20 March 2008 (not all chiros think vaccination is controvercial). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is part of a series on
Alternative medicine
General information
Fringe medicine and science
Controversies
Classifications
Traditional medicine
Alternative diagnoses

Chiropractic (from Greek chiro- χειρο- "hand-" + praktikós πρακτικός "concerned with action") is a complementary and alternative medicine health care profession that focuses on diagnosis, treatment and prevention of mechanical disorders of the musculoskeletal system and the effects of these disorders on the functions of the nervous system and general health. It emphasizes manual therapy including spinal adjustment and other joint and soft-tissue manipulation.[1] Traditionally, it is based on the premise that a vertebral subluxation or spinal joint dysfunction can interfere with the nervous system and result in many different conditions of diminished health. Today, the progressive view examines the relationship between structure and function and its impact on neurological mechanisms in both health and disease.[2][3][4]

Chiropractors, known as Doctors of Chiropractic or chiropractic doctors/physicians, in some jurisdictions,[5][6] use a combination of treatments which are predicated on the specific needs of the individual patient. A chiropractor can develop and carry out a comprehensive treatment/management plan which can include spinal adjustments, soft tissue therapy, prescription of exercises, and health and lifestyle counseling.[7]

Chiropractic was founded in 1895 by D. D. Palmer in the USA, and is practiced in more than 100 countries.[8][9] Since its inception, chiropractic has been the subject of controversy within the profession and among the medical and scientific community, particularly regarding the metaphysical approach espoused by its founders and advocated by "straight" chiropractors.[10][11] This same criticism may have been the catalyst that allowed some within the profession to emphasize primarily a neuromusculoskeletal approach in their educational curriculum (see Council on Chiropractic Education), leading them away from the traditional metaphysical explanations of their predecessors towards more scientific ones.[12][13]

Chiropractors have historically fallen into two main groups, "straights" and "mixers"; both contain recent off-shoots.[14][15] Significant differences regarding scope of practice, claims made about spinal manipulation, and beliefs regarding professional integration, differentiate the various schools of thought and practice styles held within the profession.[16]

Philosophy

Traditional and evidence-based chiropractic belief systems vary along a philosophical spectrum ranging from vitalism to materialism; these opposing philosophies have been a source of debate since the time of Aristotle and Plato. Vitalism, the belief that living things contain an element that cannot be explained through matter, was responsible for legally and philosophically differentiating chiropractic from allopathic medicine and thereby helping ensure professional autonomy.[17] Chiropractic also retains elements of materialism, the belief that all things have explanations, which forms the basis of science. Evidence-based chiropractic balances this dualism by emphasizing both the tangible, testable principle that structure affects function, and the untestable, metaphorical recognition that life is self-sustaining.[18] The chiropractor's purpose is to foster the establishment and maintenance of an organism-environment dynamic that is the most conducive to functional well-being of the person as a whole.[18] Principles such as holism, naturalism, therapeutic conservatism, critical rationalism, and thoughts from the phenomenological and humanistic paradigms form an important part of the philosophy of chiropractic"[19]

Chiropractors can adopt or share vitalist, naturalist, or materialist viewpoints and emphasize a holistic, patient-centered approach which appreciates the multifactorial nature of influences (i.e. structural, chemical, and psychological) on the functioning of the body in health and disease and recognizes the dynamics and interplay between lifestyle, environment, and health. This holistic paradigm is also blended with a biopsychosocial approach, which is also emphasized in chiropractic care. In addition, chiropractors also retain naturopathic and naturalist principles that suggest decreased "host resistance" of the body facilitates the disease process and that natural interventions are preferable towards strengthening the host in its effort to optimize function and return to homeostasis.[18] Chiropractic care primarily emphasizes manipulation and other manual therapies as an alternative than medications and surgery.[20]

Chiropractors also commonly use nutrition, exercise, patient education, health promotion and lifestyle counseling as part of their holistic outlook towards preventive health care.[21] Chiropractic's claim to improve health by improving biomechanical and neural function by the manual correction of joint and soft tissue dysfunctions of the neuromusculoskeletal system differentiates it from mainstream medicine and other complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) disciplines, but is also rooted, in part, in osteopathy and eastern medicine interventions.[19] All chiropractic paradigms emphasize the spine as their focus, but their rationales for treatment vary depending on their particular belief system.

The philosophy of chiropractic also stresses the importance of prevention and primarily utilizes a pro-active approach and a wellness model to achieve this goal.[22] For some, prevention includes a concept of "maintenance care" which attempts to "detect and correct" structural imbalances of the neuromusculoskeletal system while in its primary, or functional state.[23] The objective is early identification of mechanical dysfunctions to prevent or delay permanent pathological changes.[24]

In summary, the major premises regarding the philosophy of chiropractic include:[18]

  • Holism
  • noninvasive, emphasizes patient's inherent recuperative abilities
  • recognizes dynamics between lifestyle, environment, and health
  • spine and health are related in an important and fundamental way, and this relationship is mediated through the nervous system.[17]
  • recognizes the centrality of the nervous system and its intimate relationship with both the structural and regulatory capacities of the body
  • appreciates the multifactorial nature of influences (structural, chemical, and psychological) on the nervous system
  • Conservatism
  • balances the benefits against the risks of clinical interventions
  • emphasizes noninvasive treatments to minimize risk with a preference to avoid surgery and medication
  • recognizes as imperative the need to monitor progress and effectiveness through appropriate diagnostic procedures
  • prevents unnecessary barriers in the doctor-patient encounter
  • Manual and biopsychosocial approaches
  • strives toward early intervention, emphasizing timely diagnosis and treatment of reversible conditions before loss of functionality
  • emphasizes a patient-centered model whereby the patient is considered to be indispensable in, and ultimately responsible for, the maintenance of health.[17]
  • approach of improving health through influencing function through structure primarily via manual therapies

Treatment procedures

Main article: Chiropractic treatment techniques
Procedures received by more than 1/3 of patients of licensed U.S. chiropractors (2003 survey)[25]
procedure % of DCs
using
it 		% of patients
receiving
it
Diversified (full-spine manipulation) 96.2 71.5
Physical fitness/exercise promotion 98.3 64.9
Corrective or therapeutic exercise 98.3 63.2
Ergonomic/postural advice 97.3 61.9
Self-care strategies 96.6 60.6
Activities of daily living 96.6 57.9
Changing risky/unhealthy behaviors 96.6 54.9
Nutritional/dietary recommendations 97.7 51.8
Relaxation/stress reduction recommendations 96.4 50.1
Ice pack/cryotherapy 94.5 48.5
Extremity adjusting 95.4 46.8
Trigger point therapy 91.0 45.3
Disease prevention/early screening advice 90.8 39.7

Spinal manipulation is the most common modality in chiropractic care.[25] The medicinal use of spinal manipulation can be traced back over 3000 years to ancient Chinese writings. Hippocrates, the "father of medicine" used manipulative techniques,[26] as did the ancient Egyptians and many other cultures. A modern reemphasis on manipulative therapy occurred in the late 19th century in North America with the emergence of the osteopathic medicine and chiropractic medicine.[27] Spinal manipulation gained mainstream recognition during the 1980s (see History). In the U.S., chiropractors perform over 90% of all manipulative treatments[28] and consider themselves to be expertly qualified providers of spinal adjustment, manipulation and other manual treatments.[29]

Manipulation under anesthesia or MUA is a specialized manipulative procedure that typically occurs in hospitals administered under general anaesthesia. Typically, it is performed on patients who have failed to respond to other forms of treatment.[citation needed]

Schools of thought and practice styles

Contrary to the understanding of many within health care, chiropractic is not synonymous with, or limited to, the application of specific manipulative techniques. The “adjustment” and various manual therapies are central components of a chiropractor’s treatment options: however, the profession as an established primary contact health service has the educational requirements and respects the responsibilities associated with such a status.[30] Significant differences amongst the practice styles, claims and beliefs between various chiropractors.[16] Those differences are reflected in the varied viewpoints of multiple national practice associations.[31]

Straight

Straight chiropractors are the oldest movement. They adhere to the philosophical principles set forth by D. D. and B. J. Palmer, and retain metaphysical definitions and vitalistic qualities. Straight chiropractors believe that vertebral subluxation leads to interference with an Innate intelligence within the human nervous system and is a primary underlying risk factor for almost any disease. Straights view the medical diagnosis of patient complaints (which they consider to be the "secondary effects" of subluxations) to be unnecessary for treatment [citation needed]. Thus, straight chiropractors are concerned primarily with the detection and correction of vertebral subluxation via adjustment and do not "mix" other types of therapies. Their philosophy and explanations are metaphysical in nature and prefer to use traditional chiropractic lexicon (i.e. perform spinal analysis, detect subluxation, correct with adjustment, etc.). They prefer to remain separate and distinct from mainstream health care.

Mixer

Mixer chiropractors are an early offshoot of the straight movement. This branch "mixes" diagnostic and treatment approaches from naturopathic, osteopathic, medical, and chiropractic viewpoints. Unlike straight chiropractors, mixer chiropractors incorporate mainstream medical diagnostics and employ myriad treatments including joint and soft tissue manipulation, electromodalities, physical therapy, exercise-rehabilitation and other complementary and alternative approaches such as acupuncture.[14] They tend to focus more on the neuromusculoskeletal system but also treat non-neuromusculoskeletal conditions as well. Mixers tend to use more mainstream scientific methods and descriptions as opposed to metaphysical ones.


Range of belief perspectives in chiropractic[18]
perspective attribute potential belief endpoints
scope of practice: narrow ("straight") ← → broad ("mixer")
diagnostic approach: intuitive ← → analytical
philosophic orientation: vitalistic ← → materialistic
scientific orientation: descriptive ← → experimental
process orientation: implicit ← → explicit
practice attitude: doctor/model-centered ← → patient/situation-centered
professional integration: separate and distinct ← → integrated into mainstream

Education, licensing, and regulation

Main articles: Chiropractic education and Chiropractic schools

There are many slight variations on the following models: however, in general, there are three major educational paths involving full‐time education:

  • A four‐year full‐time programme within specifically designated colleges or universities, following 1‐4 years of suitable pre‐chiropractic training in basic sciences at university level
  • A five‐year bachelor integrated chiropractic degree programme offered within a public or private university, with student entrance based upon the applicant’s matriculation status and the university’s admission requirements and quota restrictions.
  • A two or three‐year pre‐professional Masters programme following the satisfactory completion of a specifically designed bachelor degree programme in chiropractic or a suitably adapted health science degree.[32]

Irrespective of the model of education utilized, for those without relevant prior health care education or experience, not less than 4200 student/teacher contact hours are required, or the equivalent, in four years of full‐time education. This includes not less than 1000 hours of supervised clinical training. Presently, there are 15 accredited Doctor of Chiropractic programs in 18 locations in the USA and two in Canada,[33] and an estimated 70,000 chiropractors in the USA, 6500 in Canada, 2500 in Australia, 2,381 in the UK, and smaller numbers in about 50 other countries. In the USA and Canada, licensed individuals who practice chiropractic are commonly referred to as chiropractors, doctors of chiropractic (DC), or chiropractic physicians.[citation needed]

Scope of practice

Chiropractic practice involves a general and specific range of diagnostic methods, including skeletal imaging, laboratory tests, orthopaedic and neurological evaluations,as well as observational and tactile assessments. Patient management involves spinal adjustment and other manual therapies, rehabilitative exercises, supportive and adjunctive measures, patient education and counselling. Chiropractic practice emphasizes conservative management of the neuromusculoskeletal system, without the use of medicines and surgery.[34] It is generally not within the scope of practice of chiropractors to write medical prescriptions. A notable exception is the state of Oregon, which allows chiropractors with additional qualifications to prescribe over-the-counter drugs.[citation needed] Traditionally, chiropractors have opposed prescription drugs, but in a 2003 survey of North American chiropractors a slight majority supported limited prescription rights.[35] Depending on the country or state in which a chiropractic school is located, some chiropractors may obtain additional training to perform minor surgery or proctology.[36] When indicated, the doctor of chiropractic consults with, co-manages with, or refers to other health care providers.[1]

Utilization and satisfaction rates

Chiropractic is the largest alternative medical profession in the U.S.[14] The percentage of population that utilize chiropractic care at any given time generally fall into a range from 6% to 12% in the U.S. and Canada,[37] with a global high of 20% in Alberta.[38] The vast majority who seek chiropractic care do so for relief from back and neck pain and other neuromusculoskeletal complaints;[39] most do so specifically for low back pain.[37] Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners such as chiropractors are often used as a complementary form of care to primary medical intervention.[37] Satisfaction rates are typically higher for chiropractic care compared to medical care, with quality of communication seeming to be a consistent predictor of patient satisfaction with chiropractors.[40] Despite high patient satisfaction scores, utilization of chiropractic care is sensitive to the costs incurred by the co-payment by the patient.[41] The use of chiropractic is growing modestly; CAM as a whole is seeing wholesale increases.[37] Employment of U.S. chiropractors is expected to increase 14% between 2006 and 2016, faster than the average for all occupations.[42]

History

Main articles: Chiropractic history and Vertebral subluxation
File:Ddpalmer3.jpg
D.D. Palmer

Although spinal manipulation dates back to Hippocrates and the ancient Greek physicians[43] the discovery of chiropractic is attributed to Canadian-American D.D. Palmer in 1895 [44], with the first school for the training of chiropractors commencing in the United States of America in Davenport, Iowa in 1897.[45] Palmer developed the chiropractic theory and method from a variety of sources, including medical manipulation, bonesetting and osteopathy, as well as incorporating unique aspects of his own design. The term “chiropractic”, derived from Greek roots to mean “done by hand”, originated with Palmer and was coined by a patient, the Reverend Samuel H. Weed. [46] Palmer hypothesized that manual manipulation of the spine could result in improved neurological function and health. Chiropractic developed in the United States of America during a period of significant reformation in medical training and practice. At the time, there was a great variety of treatment options, both within conventional medicine and among innumerable other alternative health care approaches. [47]

Vertebral subluxation

Palmer hypothesized that vertebral joint misalignments, which he termed "vertebral subluxations" interfered with the body's function and its inborn (innate) ability to heal itself.[15] D.D. Palmer repudiated his earlier theory that vertebral subluxations caused pinched nerves in the intervertebral spaces in favor of subluxations causing altered nerve vibration, either too tense or too slack, affecting the tone (health) of the end organ. D.D. Palmer, using a vitalistic approach, imbued the term subluxation with a metaphysical and philosophical meaning. He qualified this by noting that knowledge of innate intelligence was not essential to the competent practice of chiropractic.[48] This concept was later expanded upon by his son, B.J. Palmer and was instrumental in providing the legal basis of differentiating chiropractic medicine from allopathic medicine. In 1910, D.D. Palmer theorized that the nervous system controlled health:

"Physiologists divide nerve-fibers, which form the nerves, into two classes, afferent and efferent. Impressions are made on the peripheral afferent fiber-endings; these create sensations which are transmitted to the center of the nervous system. Efferent nerve-fibers carry impulses out from the center to their endings. Most of these go to muscles and are therefore called motor impulses; some are secretory and enter glands; a portion are inhibitory their function being to restrain secretion. Thus, nerves carry impulses outward and sensations inward. The activity of these nerves, or rather their fibers, may become excited or allayed by impingement, the result being a modification of functionality—too much or not enough action—which is disease."[49]

In general, critics of traditional subluxation-based chiropractic (including chiropractors) are skeptical of its clinical value, dogmatic beliefs and metaphysical approach. While straight chiropractic still retains the traditional vitalistic construct espoused by the founders, evidence-based chiropractic suggests that a mechanistic view will allow chiropractic care to become integrated into the wider health care community.[10] This is still a continuing source of debate within the chiropractic profession as well, with some schools of chiropractic (for example, Palmer School of Chiropractic[50]) still teaching the traditional/straight subluxation-based chiropractic, while others (for example, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College[51]) have moved towards an evidence-based chiropractic which rejects metaphysical foundings and limits itself to primarily neuromusculoskeletal conditions but retains a holistic approach and an emphasis on manual therapy. chiropractic's other features. As of 2005, the chiropractic subluxation was defined by the World Health Organization as "A lesion or dysfunction in a joint or motion segment in which alignment, movement integrity and/or physiological function are altered, although contact between joint surfaces remains intact. It is essentially a functional entity, which may influence biomechanical and neural integrity."[52] "This definition is different from the current medical definition, in which subluxation is a significant structural displacement, and therefore visible on static imaging studies."[52]

Medical opposition

In 1899, a medical doctor in Davenport, USA, named Heinrich Matthey started a campaign against drugless practitioners. D.D. Palmer insisted that his techniques did not need the same courses or license as medical doctors, as his graduates did not prescribe drugs, perform surgery or evaluate laboratory diagnostics. However, in 1906, D.D. Palmer was convicted for practicing medicine without a license. In response, B.J. created the Universal Chiropractic Association (UCA) for the purpose of protecting its members by covering their legal expenses should they get arrested for practicing medicine.[53]

File:BJPalmer2.jpg
BJ Palmer, Developer of Chiropractic, 1882-1961

Its first case came in 1907, when Shegataro Morikubo, DC was charged with unlicensed practice of osteopathic medicine in Wisconsin. Morikubo was freed using the defense that chiropractic philosophy was different from osteopathic philosophy. The victory reshaped the development of the chiropractic profession, which then marketed itself as a science, an art and a philosophy. This began a longstanding feud between chiropractors and medical doctors that would culminate in the mid 1980's in a landmark case, Wilk et al. vs American Medical Association (AMA). Until 1983, the AMA held that it was unethical for medical doctors to associate with an "unscientific practitioner", and labeled chiropractic "an unscientific cult".[This quote needs a citation] In 1984, Joseph Janse, DC, ND, attempted to describe the divide in chiropractic and medical philosophy regarding prevention and patient care:

"Unless pathology is demonstrable under the microscope, as in the laboratory or by roentgenograms, to them [allopaths] it does not exist. For years the progressive minds in chiropractic have pointed out this deficiency. With emphasis they [chiropractors] have maintained the fact that prevention is so much more effective than attempts at a cure. They pioneered the all-important principle that effective eradication of disease is accomplished only when it is in its functional (beginning) phase rather than its organic (terminal) stage. It has been their contention that in general the doctor, the therapist and the clinician have failed to realize exactly what is meant by disease processes, and have been satisfied to consider damaged organs as disease, and to think in terms of sick organs and not in terms of sick people. In other words, we have failed to contrast disease with health, and to trace the gradual deteriorization along the downward path, believing almost that mild departures from the physiological normal were of little consequence, until they were replaced by pathological changes…"[54]

Wilk et al. vs. American Medical Association

Chester A. Wilk, DC from Chicago initiated an antitrust suit against the AMA and other medical associations in 1976 - Wilk et al. vs AMA et al..[55] The landmark lawsuit ended in 1987 when the US District Court found the AMA guilty of conspiracy and restraint of trade; the Joint Council on Accreditation of Hospitals and the American College of Physicians were exonerated. The court recognized that the AMA had to show its concern for patients, but was not persuaded that this could not have been achieved in a manner less restrictive of competition, for instance by public education campaigns.[12] A summary of the court's opinion concluded:

"Evidence at the trial showed that the defendants took active steps, often covert, to undermine chiropractic educational institutions, conceal evidence of the usefulness of chiropractic care, undercut insurance programs for patients of chiropractors, subvert government inquiries into the efficacy of chiropractic, engage in a massive disinformation campaign to discredit and destabilize the chiropractic profession and engage in numerous other activities to maintain a medical physician monopoly over health care in this country."[12]

On February 7, 1990, the AMA lost its appeal to the Supreme Court,[56] and could no longer prevent medical physicians from collaborating with chiropractors.[12]

Movement toward science

In 1975, chiropractors joined medical and scientific attendees in a workshop sponsored by the National Institutes of Health on the research status of spinal manipulation. In 1978, the Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) was launched.[57] in 1983 the JMPT published an article advocating "a scientific institution with some capability for research" and was considered the beginning of the scientific chiropractic movement .[58] Spinal manipulative therapy gained recognition by mainstream medicine during the 1980s.[59]

Scientific investigation

Main article: Scientific investigation of chiropractic
Two chiropractic belief system constructs[18]
THE TESTABLE PRINCIPLE   THE UNTESTABLE METAPHOR
Chiropractic Adjustment Universal Intelligence
↓ ↓
Restoration of Structural Integrity Innate Intelligence
↓ ↓
Improvement of Health Status Body Physiology
 
MATERIALISTIC:       VITALISTIC:
— operational definitions possible — origin of holism in chiropractic
— lends itself to scientific inquiry — cannot be proven or disproven

In chiropractic's early years, influences from both straight and mixer concepts were incorporated into its construct. Chiropractic has both materialistic qualities that lend themselves to scientific investigation and vitalistic qualities that do not.[18]

With relatively little federal funding, academic research in chiropractic has only recently become established in the USA. In 1994 and 1995, half of all grant funding to chiropractic researchers was from the US Health Resources and Services Administration (7 grants totaling $2.3 million). The Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (11 grants, $881,000) and the Consortium for Chiropractic Research (4 grants, $519,000) accounted for most of the rest. By 1997, there were 14 peer-reviewed chiropractic journals in English that encouraged the publication of chiropractic research, including The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT), Topics in Clinical Chiropractic, and the Journal of Chiropractic Humanities. However, of these, only JMPT is indexed in MEDLINE. Research into chiropractic, whether from Universities or chiropractic colleges, is however often published in many other scientific journals.[60]

While there is still debate about the effectiveness of chiropractic for the many conditions in which it is applied, chiropractic seems to be most effective for acute low back pain and tension headaches.[61] One small pilot study has shown that upper cervical spinal manipulation may be beneficial for certain types of hypertension.[62]

When testing the efficacy of health treatments, double blind studies are considered acceptable scientific rigor. These are designed so that neither the patient nor the doctor knows whether they are using the actual treatment or a placebo (or "sham") treatment. However, chiropractic treatment involves a manipulation; "sham" procedures cannot be easily devised for this, and even if the patient is unaware whether the treatment is a real or sham procedure, the doctor cannot be unaware. Thus there may be "observer bias" - the tendency to see what you expect to see, and the potential for the patient to wish to report benefits to "please" the doctor. Similarly, it is often difficult to devise a sham procedure for surgical procedures, but it is not impossible. It is also a problem in evaluating treatments; even when there are objective outcome measures, the placebo effect can be very substantial. Thus, DCs have historically relied mostly on their own clinical experience and the shared experience of their colleagues, as reported in case studies, to direct their treatment methods. Consequently there has been a call to increase qualitative research studies which can better examine the whole chiropractic clinical encounter.

The Manga Report

The Manga Report was an outcomes-study funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and conducted by three health economists led by Professor Pran Manga. The Report supported the scientific validity, safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic for low-back pain, and found that chiropractic care had higher patient satisfaction levels than conventional alternatives. The report states that "The literature clearly and consistently shows that the major savings from chiropractic management come from fewer and lower costs of auxiliary services, fewer hospitalizations, and a highly significant reduction in chronic problems, as well as in levels and duration of disability."[63]

Workers' Compensation studies

In 1998, a study of 10,652 Florida workers' compensation cases was conducted by Steve Wolk. He concluded that "a claimant with a back-related injury, when initially treated by a chiropractor versus a medical doctor, is less likely to become temporarily disabled, or if disabled, remains disabled for a shorter period of time; and claimants treated by medical doctors were hospitalized at a much higher rate than claimants treated by chiropractors."[64] Similarly, a 1991 study of Oregon Workers' Compensation Claims examined 201 randomly selected workers' compensation cases that involved disabling low-back injuries: when individuals with similar injuries were compared, those who visited DCs generally missed fewer days of work than those who visited MDs.[65]

A 1989 study analyzed data on Iowa state records from individuals who filed claims for back or neck injuries. The study compared benefits and the cost of care from MDs, DCs and DOs, focusing on individuals who had missed days of work and who had received compensation for their injuries. Individuals who visited DCs missed on average 2.3 fewer days than those who visited MDs, and 3.8 fewer days than those who saw DOs, and accordingly, less money was dispersed as employment compensation on average for individuals who visited DCs.[66]

In 1989, a survey by Cherkin et al. concluded that patients receiving care from health maintenance organizations in the state of Washington were three times as likely to report satisfaction with care from DCs as they were with care from other physicians. The patients were also more likely to believe that their chiropractor was concerned about them.[67]

American Medical Association (AMA)

In 1997, the following statement was adopted as policy of the AMA after a report on a number of alternative therapies.[68] Specifically about chiropractic care it said,"Manipulation has been shown to have a reasonably good degree of efficacy in ameliorating back pain, headache, and similar musculoskeletal complaints." In 1992, the AMA stated "It is ethical for a physician to associate professionally with chiropractors provided that the physician believes that such association is in the best interests of his or her patient. A physician may refer a patient for diagnostic or therapeutic services to a chiropractor permitted by law to furnish such services whenever the physician believes that this may benefit his or her patient. Physicians may also ethically teach in recognized schools of chiropractic. (V, VI)"[69]

British Medical Association

The British Medical Association notes that "There is also no problem with GPs [doctors] referring patients to practitioners in osteopathy and chiropractic who are registered with the relevant statutory regulatory bodies, as a similar means of redress is available to the patient."[70]

Safety

Spinal manipulative therapy is the primary therapeutic procedure used by chiropractors, and because spinal manipulation involves the forceful passive movement of the joint beyond its active limit of motion, chiropractors must identify the risk factors that contraindicate manipulation or mobilization[71][72][73] Manipulation is regarded as a relatively safe, effective and conservative means of providing pain relief and structural improvement of biomechanical problems of the spine.[74] As with all therapeutic interventions, however, complications can arise. Serious neurological complications and vascular accidents have been reported, although both are rare.

Spinal manipulation is associated with frequent, mild and temporary side effects,[75][76] including new or worsening pain or stiffness in the affected region.[77] They have been estimated to occur in 34% to 55% of patients, with 80% of them disappearing within 24 hours.[75] Rarely, the administration of spinal manipulation, particularly on to the upper cervical spine, can also result in serious neurological complications though this appear to be unpredictable and should be considered an inherent, idiosyncratic, and rare complication of this treatment approach [78] which can occur in both adults[76] and children.[79] The incidence of these complications is unknown, due to rarity, high levels of underreporting, and difficulty of linking manipulation to adverse effects such as stroke, a particular concern.[76] Vertebrobasilar artery stroke is statistically associated with chiropractic services in persons under 45 years of age, but it is similarly associated with general practitioner services, suggesting that these associations are likely explained by preexisting conditions. Furthermore, no evidence of excess risk of VBA stroke associated chiropractic care compared to primary care[80] Contraindications to spinal manipulation include non-indication where mobilization or manipulation may do no good or do no harm to absolute contraindications where manipulation or mobilization could be life threatening. [52] In many instances mobilization or manipulation may be contraindicated in one area of the spine but beneficial in another [81] Also in relative contraindications, low‐force and soft‐tissue techniques are the treatments of choice, as both may be performed safely in most situations where a relative contraindication is present.[52] Nevertheless, some neurological signs, such as visual disturbances indicate referral to emergency medical services.[75][75] The chiropractor’s scope in manual therapy extends beyond the use of manipulation or mobilization and includes manual traction, passive stretching, massage, ischaemic compression of trigger points and reflex techniques designed to reduce pain and muscle spasm. Chiropractic care in general is safe when employed skillfully and appropriately [52] in comparison to surgical and medication approaches for mechanical pain syndromes.

Vaccination

Although vaccination is one of the most cost-effective forms of prevention against infectious disease,[82] it remains controversial withins factions of the chiropractic community.[83] Most chiropractic writings on vaccination focus on its negative aspects.[84] Evidence-based chiropractors have embraced vaccination, but a minority of the profession rejects it, as traditional chiropractic philosophy traces diseases to causes in the spine and states that diseases cannot be affected by vaccines.[85] The American Chiropractic Association and the International Chiropractic Association support individual exemptions to compulsory vaccination laws, and a 1995 survey of U.S. chiropractors found that about a third believed there was no scientific proof that immunization prevents disease.[85] The Canadian Chiropractic Association supports vaccination; surveys in Canada in 2000 and 2002 found that 40% of chiropractors supported vaccination, and that over a quarter opposed it and advised patients against vaccinating themselves or their children.[84]

References

  1. ^ a b Council on Chiropractic Education (2007). "Standards for Doctor of Chiropractic programs and requirements for institutional status" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-02-14.
  2. ^ National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2007). "An introduction to chiropractic". Retrieved 2008-02-14.
  3. ^ American Chiropractic Association. "A history of chiropractic care". Retrieved 2008-02-14.
  4. ^ "Chiropractic Care and Back Pain". WebMD. WebMD LLC. 2008-02-24. Retrieved 2008-02-25. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  5. ^ [1]
  6. ^ [2]
  7. ^ What Is Chiropractic?
  8. ^ Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards, Questions and Answers about Professional Regulation and the Chiropractic Profession, Where are chiropractors regulated?, January 9, 2006.available online
  9. ^ Michel Tetrault, DC, Country Chiropractic Support, Chiropractic Diplomatic Corps. available online
  10. ^ a b Keating JC Jr, Charlton KH, Grod JP, Perle SM, Sikorski D, Winterstein JF (2005). "Subluxation: dogma or science?". Chiropr Osteopat. 13: 17. doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-17.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  11. ^ Jaroff, Leon (February 27, 2002). "Back Off, Chiropractors!". CNN. Time magazine. Retrieved 2008-02-10.
  12. ^ a b c d Wilk vs American Medical Association Summary: Cite error: The named reference "Wilk" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  13. ^ Mirtz TA, Long P, Dinehart A. Slaughter RL, DuVall Jr., CE, Bryson R, Kourmadas F. Campo J. NACM and its argument with mainstream chiropractic health care. Journal of Controversial Medical Claims, 2002;9(1):11-25. (Article summary)
  14. ^ a b c Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM (1998). "Chiropractic: origins, controversies, and contributions". Arch Intern Med. 158 (20): 2215–24. PMID 9818801.
  15. ^ a b Keating JC Jr (2005). "A brief history of the chiropractic profession". In Haldeman S, Dagenais S, Budgell B et al. (eds.) (ed.). Principles and Practice of Chiropractic (3rd ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 23–64. ISBN 0-07-137534-1. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  16. ^ a b James W. Healey, DC (1990) It's Where You Put the Period. Dynamic Chiropractic, October 10, 1990, Volume 08, Issue 21
  17. ^ a b c Keating JC Jr (2005). "Philosophy in chiropractic". In Haldeman S, Dagenais S, Budgell B et al. (eds.) (ed.). Principles and Practice of Chiropractic (3rd ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 77–98. ISBN 0-07-137534-1. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Mootz RD, Phillips RB (1997). "Chiropractic belief systems". In Cherkin DC, Mootz RD (eds.) (ed.). Chiropractic in the United States: Training, Practice, and Research. AHCPR Pub No. 98-N002. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. pp. 9–16. OCLC 39856366. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |editor= has generic name (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  19. ^ a b Phillips RB (2005). "The evolution of vitalism and materialism and its impact on philosophy". In Haldeman S, Dagenais S, Budgell B et al. (eds.) (ed.). Principles and Practice of Chiropractic (3rd ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 65–76. ISBN 0-07-137534-1. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  20. ^ Hansen DT, Mootz RD (1999). "Formal processes in health care technology assessment: a primer for the chiropractic profession". In Mootz RD, Hansen DT (ed.). Chiropractic technologies. Jones & Bartlett. pp. 3–17. ISBN 0834213737.
  21. ^ Rupert RL (2000). "A survey of practice patterns and the health promotion and prevention attitudes of US chiropractors, maintenance care: part I". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 23 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1016/S0161-4754(00)90107-6. PMID 10658870.
  22. ^ Rupert RL, Manello D, Sandefur R (2000). "Maintenance care: health promotion services administered to US chiropractic patients aged 65 and older, part II". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 23 (1): 10–9. doi:10.1016/S0161-4754(00)90108-8. PMID 10658871.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. ^ Canadian Chiropractic Association (1996). "Glenerin guidelines: preventive maintenance care". Retrieved 2008-02-26.
  24. ^ Vear HJ (1992). "Scope of chiropractic practice". In Vear HJ (ed.) (ed.). Chiropractic Standards of Practice and Quality of Care. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen. pp. 49–68. OCLC 23972994. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)
  25. ^ a b Christensen MG, Kollasch MW (2005). "Professional functions and treatment procedures". Job Analysis of Chiropractic. Greeley, CO: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners. pp. 121–38. ISBN 1-884457-05-3. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  26. ^ Dean C. Swedlo, "The Historical Development of Chiropractic." pp. 55-58, The Proceedings of the 11th Annual History of Medicine Days, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Calgary
  27. ^ Keating JC Jr (2003). "Several pathways in the evolution of chiropractic manipulation". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 26 (5): 300–21. doi:10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54125-7. PMID 12819626.
  28. ^ [3]
  29. ^ World Federation of Chiropractic (2005). "WFC consultation on the identity of the chiropractic profession". Retrieved 2008-02-14.
  30. ^ WHO Guidelines
  31. ^ [4]
  32. ^ [5]
  33. ^ "Accredited Doctor of Chiropractic Programs". The Council on Chiropractic Education. Retrieved 2008-02-22.
  34. ^ WHO guidelines
  35. ^ McDonald WP, Durkin KF, Pfefer M; et al. (2003). How Chiropractors Think and Practice: The Survey of North American Chiropractors. Ada, OH: Institute for Social Research, Ohio Northern University. ISBN 0972805559. {{cite book}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Summarized in: McDonald WP, Durkin KF, Pfefer M (2004). "How chiropractors think and practice: the survey of North American chiropractors". Semin Integr Med. 2 (3): 92–8. doi:10.1016/j.sigm.2004.07.002. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |laydate= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |laysource= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |laysummary= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ^ Oregon Chiropractic Licensing Information.
  37. ^ a b c d Lawrence DJ, Meeker WC (2007). "Chiropractic and CAM utilization: a descriptive review". Chiropr Osteopat. 15 (2). doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-2. PMID 17241465.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  38. ^ [6]
  39. ^ Hurwitz EL, Chiang LM (2006). "A comparative analysis of chiropractic and general practitioner patients in North America: findings from the joint Canada/United States Survey of Health, 2002–03". BMC Health Serv Res. 6 (49). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-49. PMID 16600038.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  40. ^ Gaumer G (2006). "Factors associated with patient satisfaction with chiropractic care: survey and review of the literature". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 29 (6): 455–62. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.013. PMID 16904491.
  41. ^ Chapman-Smith DA, Cleveland CS III (2005). "International status, standards, and education of the chiropractic profession". In Haldeman S, Dagenais S, Budgell B et al. (eds.) (ed.). Principles and Practice of Chiropractic (3rd ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 111–34. ISBN 0-07-137534-1. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  42. ^ Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007). "Occupational outlook handbook". Retrieved 2008-02-14.
  43. ^ Withington BT. Hippocrates, with an English translation. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1928.
  44. ^ Palmer DD. The chiropractor’s adjustor. Portland, OR, Portland Printing House, 1910.
  45. ^ Gibbons RW. Medical and social protest as part of hidden American history. In:Haldeman S, ed. Principles and practice of chiropractic. East Norwalk, CT, Appleton Lang, 1992:17.
  46. ^ Palmer DD. Three generations: a history of chiropractic. Davenport, Iowa, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1967:29.
  47. ^ Ehrenreich B, English E. For her own good. New York, Anchor/Doubleday, 1978:16.
  48. ^ Keating J (1995), D.D. Palmer's Forgotten Theories of Chiropractic, A Presentation to the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
  49. ^ Cite error: The named reference Palmer1910 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  50. ^ [7]
  51. ^ PDF online
  52. ^ a b c d e World Health Organization (2005). "WHO guidelines on basic training and safety in chiropractic" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-02-29. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  53. ^ Keating J. (1999), Tom Moore Defender of Chiropractic Part 1, Dynamic Chiropractic
  54. ^ Janse J, quoted in: Strang VV (1984). Essential Principles of Chiropractic. Davenport, IA: Palmer College of Chiropractic. pp. p. 26. OCLC 12102972. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  55. ^ Robbins J (1996),Medical monopoly: the game nobody wins - excerpt from 'Reclaiming Our Health: Exploding the Medical Myth and Embracing the Source of True Healing', Vegetarian Times available online
  56. ^ DR. CHESTER A. WILK, D.C., DR. JAMES W. BRYDEN, D.C., DR. PATRICIA B. ARTHUR, D.C., AND DR. MICHAEL D. PEDIGO, D.C., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-APPELLEE. DR. CHESTER A. WILK, D.C., DR. JAMES W. BRYDEN, D.C., DR. PATRICIA B. ARTHUR, D.C., AND DR. MICHAEL B. PEDIGO, D.C., PLAINTIFFS-CROSS-APPELLANTS, V. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES, 895 F.2d 352 (7th Cir. 1990) LSU Law Center. We affirm the district court's finding that the AMA violated § 1 of the Sherman Act by conducting an illegal boycott of chiropractors, and the district court's decision to grant an injunction against the AMA., 1990.C07.41521 (UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT February 7, 1990).
  57. ^ Keating JC Jr (1997). "Faulty logic & non-skeptical arguments in chiropractic" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-03-15. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  58. ^ DeBoer KF (1983). "Notes from the (chiropractic college's) underground". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 6 (3): 147–50. PMID 6655376.
  59. ^ [8]
  60. ^ Chirofind.com Chiropractic Research
  61. ^ McCrory DC, et al. (2001) Evidence Report: Behavioral and Physical Treatments for Tension-type and Cervicogenic Headache. Duke University Evidence-Based Practice Center, Durham, North Carolina available online (PDF format)
  62. ^ Bakris, G "Atlas vertebra realignment and achievement of arterial pressure goal in hypertensive patients: a pilot study" Journal of Human Hypertension (2007) 21, 347–352. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002133; published online 2 March 2007 Complete article
  63. ^ Manga P, Angus D. (1998) Enhanced Chiropractic Coverage Under OHIP as a Means of Reducing Health Care Costs, Attaining Better Health Outcomes and Achieving Equitable Access to Health Services. Retrieved 08 29 2006, from OCA
  64. ^ Wolk S. (1988) An analysis of Florida workers' compensation medical claims for back-related injuries. J Amer Chir Ass 27:50-59
  65. ^ Nyiendo J. (1991) Disability low back Oregon workers' compensation claims. Part II: Time loss. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:231-239
  66. ^ Johnson M. (1989) A comparison of chiropractic, medical and osteopathic care for work-related sprains/strains. J Manip Physiol Ther 12:335-344
  67. ^ Cherkin CD, MacCornack FA, Berg AO (1988) Managing low back pain. A comparison of the beliefs and behaviours of family physicians and chiropractors.West J Med 149:475–480
  68. ^ AMA (CSAPH) Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97) Full Text
  69. ^ AMA (Professionalism) E-3.041 Chiropractic
  70. ^ British Medical Association, "Referrals to complementary therapists"
  71. ^ Gatterman M. Standards for contraindications to spinal manipulative therapy. In Vear HJ, ed. Chiropractic standards of practice and quality of care. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen Publishers Inc, 1992
  72. ^ Vear HJ. Standards of chiropractic practice. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 1985, 8(1):33‐43
  73. ^ Gatterman MI. Indications for spinal manipulation in the treatment of back pain. Journal of the American Chiropractic Association, 1982, 19(10):51‐66
  74. ^ Kleynhans AM, Terrett AG. Cerebrovascular complications of manipulation. In: Haldeman S, ed. Principles and practice of chiropractic, 2nd ed. East Norwalk, CT, AppletonLang, 1992.
  75. ^ a b c d Anderson-Peacock E, Blouin JS, Bryans R; et al. (2005). "Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash" (PDF). J Can Chiropr Assoc. 49 (3): 158–209. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Anderson-Peacock E, Bryans B, Descarreaux M; et al. (2008). "A clinical practice guideline update from The CCA•CFCREAB-CPG" (PDF). J Can Chiropr Assoc. 52 (1): 7–8. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  76. ^ a b c Ernst E (2007). "Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review". J R Soc Med. 100 (7): 330–8. PMID 17606755.
  77. ^ Thiel HW, Bolton JE, Docherty S, Portlock JC (2007). "Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine: a prospective national survey". Spine. 32 (21): 2375–8. PMID 17906581.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  78. ^ [9]
  79. ^ Vohra S, Johnston BC, Cramer K, Humphreys K (2007). "Adverse events associated with pediatric spinal manipulation: a systematic review". Pediatrics. 119 (1): e275–83. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1392. PMID 17178922.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  80. ^ Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren Å (2008). "The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: executive summary". Spine. 33 (4 Suppl): S5–7. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643f40. PMID 18204400.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. ^ Gatterman, MI. Contraindications and complications of spinal manipulative therapy. Journal of the American Chiropractic Association, 1981, 15:575-586.
  82. ^ Orenstein WA, Mootrey GT, Pazol K, Hinman AR (2007). "Financing immunization of adults in the United States". Clin Pharmacol Ther. 82 (6): 764–8. PMID 17971821.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  83. ^ Ernst E (2001). "Rise in popularity of complementary and alternative medicine: reasons and consequences for vaccination". Vaccine. 20 (Suppl 1): S89–93. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00290-0. PMID 11587822.
  84. ^ a b Busse JW, Morgan L, Campbell JB (2005). "Chiropractic antivaccination arguments". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 28 (5): 367–73. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.04.011. PMID 15965414.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  85. ^ a b Campbell JB, Busse JW, Injeyan HS (2000). "Chiropractors and vaccination: a historical perspective". Pediatrics. 105 (4): e43. PMID 10742364.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chiropractic&oldid=199490653"