User talk:Karabinier

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Eesti-Motorized-Infantry.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Eesti Motorized Infantry.jpg. The copy called Image:Eesti Motorized Infantry.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maavägi

A tag has been placed on Maavägi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Where Anne hath a will, Anne Hathaway. 19:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OrBat graphic

Hi Karabiner, excellent work on the Military of Estonia and Maavägi articles. I made the Estonian Army OrBat graphic. You have removed it and that is no problem. If you want to add it again to the article, tell me if there are any changes needed/wanted and I will update/redesign the graphic quickly. best regards, --noclador 05:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion is NOT going to happen! Go to the Maavägi article - on the left site of the screen of wikipedia is a line: "What links here" click on it - you will see all other articles that link to Maavägi - an as you can see there is "speedy deletion link" and so your work is safe.

In the future: to make a page safe from deletion, make as many links a possible to it - i.e. link to Maavägi from all other Estonian military sites 1-2 times and look for articles that mention the Maavägi and link from there too (articles like ISAF NATO an so on :-)

and when writing something on a talkpage (ONLY talkpages!) and always at the end of your text - click on the symbol the arrow points to:

this will sign your comment for you - like I did here: --noclador 16:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I tend to agree that there are too many pictures in this article. I think you could get by with half of them, or even fewer. The number of images does make it difficult to read the text. NawlinWiki 14:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:EKV-MLD.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:EKV-MLD.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 08:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:EKV-Tuukrid.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:EKV-Tuukrid.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 08:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi Karabinier, good work on articles. But please do not tag the military insignia as your own work even thogh you might have made the images. The proper copyright tag for all such images would be PD-EE. thanks--Termer 06:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Estonian image is in the public domain because it falls into one of the categories listed in article 5 of the Copyright Act of 11 November 1992, as amended. These include:

works of folklore;
normative acts and administrative documents (laws, decrees, regulations, statutes, instructions, orders) as well as official translations thereof;
court decisions and official translations thereof;
the official symbols of the State and symbols of organizations (flags, coats of arms, orders, medals, badges etc.);
news of the day;
facts and data.

Military history Baltic states task force

Please sign up if interested at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Baltic_states_task_force. thanks!--Termer 04:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ES-Army-uni.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ES-Army-uni.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ES-army-strapes.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ES-army-strapes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Estonian images

Hi! The reason why the images were deleted can always be found in my deletion summary:

“

CSD I4: Image lacking sources or licensing information for more than seven days

”

This means that it was summarily deleted according to this policy because it didn't specify a source. All you have to do is put where you found the image in the description and it's OK. I can undelete these images if you have this information and are willing to do this. Please get back to me on my talk page. east.718 at 00:17, December 18, 2007

Estonian poem

There is already an article at Mu isamaa, mu õnn ja rõõm.

Wikipedia is not the place to put texts or other literary works. The Estonian version should go to the Estonina Wikisource. Please enter it here:

et:s:Mu isamaa on minu arm

You should create an account at the Estonian Wikisource[1].

This is the place where readers would expect to find the text.

Regarding the English translation, it should go to s:My Country is My Love. Please read s:Wikisource:Translations first and create an account[2].

Andreas ^(T) 22:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Mu isamaa, mu õnn ja rõõm is a national anthem and therefore a Wikipedia article could be justified. Mu isamaa on minu arm is mentioned in Lydia Koidula's article.

Please put the year the poem was created ir first published here: et:s: Lydia Koidula. Andreas ^(T) 22:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I saw that the two poems are different. This is not my point. For everybody's convenience, I upladed the poem to the Estoninan Wikisource (Vikitekstid), you can find it by clicking on this link: et:s:Mu isamaa on minu arm.

I did not modify your text at all. The only thing I did to the page is to add the wikisource tag and a link to the wikisource article that I created (thi little icon withthe iceberg). I would also upload the English text to Wikisource, however, I think that is your job as you seem to be the author of the translation. If I am wrong, then please add the name of the translator. I think that you agree with me that all the Estonia literature should be at the same place where everybody can find it. That why the Estonian Wikisource was created in the first place. As a person who is familiar with Estoninan culture, it would be a great asset if you could contribute to our common effort to create a systematic approach to the world's knowledge. With best regards, Andreas ^(T) 23:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want to invit you again to work on the English Wikisource. You should first create an author entry at s:Lydia Koidula. Look at other author entries to see how to format it. The upload the English translation of the song, and put "translator = wikisource" into the header. You should not put your name there, because we expect that others will ameliorate your translation, such that it will be a communal effort.

I still think that the English translation should be removed from the Wikipedia article and replaced by a link to Wikisource. The reason I propose this is that if there is duplication, it will be very difficult to keep them the same as other editors will pitch in and change your translation. Andreas ^(T) 23:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article tags

Please do not remove tags put on articles unless you have addressed the issue. Wikipedia is a community of volunteers and we rely on courteous behaviour of all editors. Andreas ^(T) 22:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource articles

I edited your article in Wikisource. You should not put a lot of information about an author into Wikisource, this goes to Wikipedia. Just write one sentence about the author and put it into the description instead of 'An Estonian poet'. Do the same for other Estonian authors you wish to enter into Wikisource. When you have uploaded the English text (you definitely shoud do this), enclose the name of the poem in double brackets, so it can be accessed by clicking on the name. Upload your translation into s:My Country is My Love, and add the header template.

You should not put an entry about an author in Wikisource unless you have at least one work included in the database.

I noticed that there are very few texts in the Vikitekstid. Maybe you can find more classical estonian texts. Note that you should comply with copyright restrictions. I do not know what is the case for Estonian authors, but generally the authoer must be dead for at least 70 years. Andreas ^(T) 01:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WIkisource

I copied your article to wikisource. You can see both versions side-by-side here [3] or by clicking on the double-arrow at the left at s:My_Country_is_My_Love. I removed some of the capital letters, see Capitalization. Andreas ^(T) 14:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:500-1991a.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:500c f.jpg. The copy called Image:500c f.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:EST-2008-coins.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:EST-modern-coins.jpg. The copy called Image:EST-modern-coins.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 16:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tags

Tags will remain in place until the article is complete, otherwise, I will have the page deleted. Thanks and Happy Editing!! Dustihowe Talk 18:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonian kroon

Hi,

I've seen that you've added a lot of stuff to Estonian kroon and tried to make it like euro or USD. I just want to tell you that I partially revert your edit not because the information is false. I did so because of the guide line at Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style/Currency article. Euro and USD have more details that don't fit with the guide line. For example, the euro is a multinational currency where many languages are all considered official. That's why it has a funny way of showing different spelling at the top of the infobox. Greek is not an official language of Estonia, that's why I reverted your edit. In addition, I see that you plan to create "Estonian coins" and "Estonian banknotes". The naming convention would result in "Banknotes of the Estonian kroon" and "Coins of the Estonian kroon". Precedents include Banknotes of the Czech koruna, Banknotes of the pound sterling, and Banknotes of the Romanian leu. Thank you. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia has had different banknotes and coins - they ahve had also different names - for excample marks and kroons, sents and pennies. I think that it is not wise to create one big "Banknotes of the Estonian kroon" and "Coins of the Estonian kroon" as they would not represent the hole evolution of the Estonian currency. The name of Banknotes of Estonia and Coins of Estonia would collect all the currency types and names under it on the other hand.

I suggest that we could add the redirection after words - but the main name would be banknotes of Estonia - then i do not have to create "Coins of the Estonian pennies, ...Marks"...

Karabinier 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Your point is completely valid. As long as the format is "Coins of somewhere" or "Coins of some currency", I'm fine with it. It's just the "Xyzian coins" format that bothers me. In the past, there were Canadian banknotes, Philippine peso bills, and all sorts of formats. The Estonian mark and the Estonian kroon are kind of like the Australian pound and the Australian dollar. There is a Coins of Australia article as a summary. There are also Coins of the Australian pound and Coins of the Australian dollar because the information is too much to fit in one article. This is just my humble suggestion.

Also, currency unit such as kroon or euro should be sentence case, not capitalized. So if you don't disagree, I will move individual denomination articles such as 500 Krooni. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 10:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm I didnt quite understood what you meant under the "I will move individual denomination articles such as 500 Krooni"? As long as you dont attend to delete the pages about kroons different banknotes.. :P Karabinier 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I don't mean to delete these pages. Just want to rename with lower case "k". --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 16:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EST al39.jpg & Image:EST-AF-iet.jpg

Hallo, where is the permission from Estonian Military posted to use these images under CC license. -- commons:User:Raul6 26. January 2008 (UTC)

These images are not normative acts or administrative documents, these images are not court decisions or official translations thereof, these images are not the official symbols of the State and symbols of organizations (flags, coats of arms, orders, medals, badges etc.). So why is there Template:PD-EE? -- commons:User:Raul6 29. January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.182.4 (talk)

use of the otherships template

Certainly. The otherships template you were using has a specific purpose. As you will see, it says "For other ships with the same name see xxx". In this case, if there were other ships of the Estonian Navy named ENS Lembit (and I see from your user page that there were) then the established convention would be to have "ENS Lembit" as a disambiguation page. (See HMS Resolution or USS Enterprise for some examples). You would then disambiguate the existing article on the submarine by moving it to something like ENS Lembit (1936), and place at the top of the article the otherships template. This is what that template is designed to be used for, for linking to other ships that have the same name as the one in the article, so that readers who are looking for one of the other ships of that name can find their way to it.

You were using it to link to a related topic, i.e. the other submarine in the class. A link like this already exists in the article itself, and in the "see also" section. We don't include it specifically in the heading. For example, the British S class of submarines consisted of over 60 boats. If we were to list them using the otherships template then there would be an enormous list at the start of each article, which would be highly confusing and counter productive. The otherships template is basically to link to other ships with the same name, not other ships in the same class. You could also think about creating a class template as a footer, as another way of directing readers to the other submarine. Please feel free to ask any more questions, if any of this is unclear or you'd like some more pointers. Kind regards, Benea (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonian Navy, Merevägi

Hi, Karabinier, you are certainly aware, that there are two articles at the moment (!?). I don't quite understand your intentions. Are you going to make Merevägi a redirect after you finished your article ? I'm not familiar with the procedures English wikipedia has for this case, so I leave it to you for now to do what's best and common standard here. (I usually write in de). Best regards. --Gf1961 (talk) 12:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining, good luck with your intentions, best regards. --Gf1961 (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:EST-APC-icon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EST-APC-icon.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TKS (EST)/TKS merger

The article did not make it clear they were modified in any way, and still does not. Thus it does not appear notable. I am looking forward to seeing it expanded, but if it won't, I am afraid it will have to be merged.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 10:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonian county infobox

Please be more specific. I do not see anything wrong with the country infobox in Estonia. Andreas ^(T) 19:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of active Estonian Navy ships

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of active Estonian Navy ships, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of active Estonian Navy ships. GregorB (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

90th Anniversary of Estonian Republic DYK

On 23 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 90th Anniversary of Estonian Republic, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:EST-Military-Parade-in Pärnu-23.02.2008.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:EST-Military-Parade-in Pärnu-23.02.2008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zginder^{(talk) (Contrib)} 01:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Estonian-counties.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Estonian-counties-municipalities.jpg. The copy called Image:Estonian-counties-municipalities.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous link

Your recent edit to Estonia included one or more links to the pages Russian, German,and English, which are disambiguation pages. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Estonia to refer directly to the most relevant topic.(This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. RussBot (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Image:Estonian-Constitution.jpg

Thanks for that outstanding job You have done around Estonia-related articles, but I have to point out small mistake - yesterday you uploaded Image:Estonian-Constitution.jpg and included it to Estonia, under caption "The original text of the Constitution of Estonia", however the document pictured is (probably copy of) Estonian Declaration of Independence. Best wishes 194.126.101.133 (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of international rankings?

Checking why you removed that section from the Estonia article. —PētersV (talk) 17:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, good idea! You might just mention something in article talk since you didn't mention in your edit summary why you removed the section. :-) —PētersV (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any Sources of Estonian GDP(PPP) per capita?

Of course it's higher than Latvian and Lithuanian but could you tell me how could it grow up from 21 000 in 2006 to 28 000? Any sources? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.61.59.236 (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Estonians

BTW, I don't think that 'Non-Estonians' in your edit remark is the correct term for "people without ANY citizenships". Normally, they are referred to as 'stateless persons'. N-lane (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia and Latvia are exceptions on this scenario. It is due to the Soviet industrial immigration waves and ex-military personel of the occupation forces - of whom mayority left between 1991 and 1998 (Estonia and Russia agreement where Estonia had to invest money into new apartments for emigrants in Russia). In Lithuania for example there is no non-Lithuanian or stateless persons problem. It is due to the fact that in Lithuania there were never such a big scale Russification programs as there were in Latvia and Estonia. Also Lithuania granted everybody citizenship in 1990. Estonia and Latvia did not as only pre-war citizens regained their ethnic and juridically correct citizenship.Karabinier (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To my opinion, 'Non-Estonian' = any person, who is not Estonian.

So it's not about any scenario, it's about the English language. N-lane (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To a foreigner it is very hard and also weird to understand the difference between these 2 person groups. You dont find in any other country such situation easily. If it were that easy and clear to everybody then I would have not made re-changes into your made edit obviously. My goal here is to broadcast in my edits the accurate and the most realistic picture about my country. That includes the difficult political relations with Russia and their so-called the 5th colomn (your stateless people). The 5th colomn is an unofficial state-level nickname of these people - including Russians with Estonian citizenship. The colomn stands for unloyal people who would start looting and supporting the invasion forces once a war again would break between Estonia and Russia. Karabinier (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's not very hard for a foreigner to understand that Estonians in the ESSR were also Soviet citizens (that's why I removed the connection between 'Soviet' and 'Non-Estonian' in the context of the ESSR)

And I also hope that any foreigner would also understand that, say, a British or an American is a 'Non-Estonian' (at least in terms of citizenship). N-lane (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The word non-Estonians have a position in the Estonian language and is regarded as a Russian speaking person mostly. Germans, Italians, Latvians, African X tribe people are not discribed as non-Estonias - they are called foreigners. This is how it goes in Estonia.

It's very interesting. But we are in the English wikipedia here, so I think it would be more appropriate to apply the rules of the English language in order not to confuse English speakers, who don't speak Estonian. N-lane (talk) 15:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In ESSR there only Soviet citizens! There were no Estonians - one big Soviet family - which aim was create to so-called "homo soveticus" - the Soviet Human whose language would be Russian and whose culture would be based on the Russian one.Karabinier (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which, following your logic, means that the ethnic Estonians in the ESSR were 'non-Estonians' (i.e. Russians :) themselves. Still, you used the term 'non-Estonian' in the ethnic context (and not in the meaning of citizenship) when you wrote about immigration in the ESSR. N-lane (talk) 15:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russification

Really "Russification only occured in the late 19th Century" and how you call then the 50 years of communism? Russification has been here with waves - during the period Estonia has been annexed or occupied by Russia, USSR, and some areas by the Russian Federation still are. The Name Estonia in the Russian Empire should be changed - as this title shows the voluntary belonging into the empire.Karabinier (Karabinier) 10:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Because the period is about Imperial Russia. Therefore occupation of USSR has nothing to do with this section. For most of the time when Estonia was in the Russian empire, German language and culture was more dominant than Russian language and culture, so calling it "Period of Russification" is absolutely incorrect. Serious Russification only started in 1889, only 29 years before Estonia gained independence. Martintg (talk) 09:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Redirects for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guy is hardly newbie. He made 1500+ edits since this account had been created. RJ CG (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lembit

See this. RJ CG (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks

Regarding This edit: Please note that labeling clearly good-faith edits as vandalism is considered as a serious personal attack and may get yourself blocked. Please familiarize yourself with the WP:VAND policy Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was cleaning up the mess what was left behind by a troll. I will report about this user - RJ CG - who has been marked as a former vandalist on certain pages on certain time events (Bronze Soldier) who tries to bend history in favor of wrong details. Therefore I am not convinced that this user acts in a good-faith effort on certain pages and articles to improve the encyclopedia. Karabinier (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia: WikiProject Kosovo, teretulemast!

Hi! I just thought I'd welcome you to WikiProject Kosovo! I am also interested in history and politics as you are. Feel free to contact me or others if you have questions or want to do co-research. Rayhou (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia stamp article

I have left a message on the Postage stamps and postal history of Estonia talk page because most of the text is a simple cut and paste of the text from the Estonian Post website which copyright material. I hope you can fix it because we really do need more new country philatelic articles. Please discuss on the article's talk page. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I asked, that we should discuss on the article talk page, so I have moved your post from my talk page to there and replied there too. ww2censor (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Politicians of the Third Reich

I have nominated Politicians of the Third Reich, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politicians of the Third Reich. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Estonia-Kosovo foreign relations

An interesting suggestion. Yes, I am interested in a topic like this. However, I think that in order to keep Wikipedia consistent we should have a look at the existing country specific relation articles. Have a look at this for example:

There is Foreign relations of France which is dived into topics such as Anglo-French relations. There are no articles for every country. Besides Estonia, Kosovo and such are not the best-known countries. Kosovo has issues with numerous nations and there should be a separate article for everyone of them if there should be one for Estonia.

Have a look at these and see if Estonia could be included or expanded in some of them if it's relevant and is missing:

Rayhou (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:German Reich-in-color-1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:German Reich-in-color-1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Wehrmacht-Pocketbattleship-Graf-Spee-in-Montevideo-harbour.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wehrmacht-Pocketbattleship-Graf-Spee-in-Montevideo-harbour.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

You're marking too many edits at Kosovo as minor. For instance, changing the name of a section is usually major, because it alters the structure of the article. Superm401 - Talk 03:36, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 30 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Postage stamps and postal history of Estonia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 04:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prishtina Coat of Arms

The reason why you are having trouble finding "Pristina's Coat of arms" is because you are searching for a city which doesn't exist. Prishtina, Kosova has an official website [4] and I believe the coat of arms is the Dardanian artifact, it's also at the top of the page. It's pictured here I hope this has helped. Kosova2008 (talk) 16:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Latvian location in Europe.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Latvian location in Europe.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Latvian location in Europe.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mothmolevna ( © ® ) 13:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander

Please revert your edit diff.Its not gonna stay anyway.Megistias (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your edit.Megistias (talk) 10:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, Karabiner!

Hi. Regarding your changes in various Macedonia-related articles, please keep in mind that the versions you see, especially regarding the Macedonia naming dispute and the historic references, they are discussed to exhaustion in numerous talkpages and archives. Please, before making any huge changes, get yourself familiar with the consensus on those talkpages. Also, please take a note of the WP:ARBMAC (an Arbitration Committee case on the issue), and of WP:MOSMAC (a set of guidelines for referring to the terms related to Macedonia). Thank you. Niko Silver 13:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is that he was Greek and that MAcedonians were Greek.The modern political issues with the slavic state and slavic people in the North of Greece is unrelated as they are.

"fficially and internationally recognized by both sides" is this some sort of joke?Megistias (talk) 12:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is however not recognized in a lot of countries and neither does it say anythign such in history books. Macedonians are a southern slavic nation. There are history films and documentaries, also on youtube made by western countries which say the opposite. I am not here to continue the never ending fight between Greeks and Macedonians - we have one here with the Moscow-Soviets and Putin - What I want to do here is that this should end on wikipedia and that wikipedia should provide the both sides claims until both sides find an agreement on the origin. Also that it would be internationally and academically recognized. At the moment it is not. Karabinier (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just remove it you are posting irrelevant arguments such as politics.Fyrom is unrelated to the issue.Megistias (talk) 12:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will not remove it as I see this article is being politilized. Macedonian claims into this issue is important as no other nation in the world has such claims. Alexander the Great play an important role to both countries history and culture legacy. Therefore such removal would be a political act.Karabinier (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop ignoring the consensus.He is an anceint Greek and they were ancient Greeks because that is the consensus of scientists.It has nothing to do with states .Megistias (talk) 12:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"as no other nation in the world has such claims".Albanians now,Bulgarians in the past ,Romanians in past,Germany & Italy in the nazi era,Nordiscists all around the globe,Black supremacists all around the globe and many others have such claims and they are or were nationalist trash claims.Just stop it please.Megistias (talk) 12:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding such silly and irrelevant material.Remove them please.Megistias (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could say the same thing towards your addings on the article. So stop asking me this silly favor.Karabinier (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

Please see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Karabinier. Thanks.Xenovatis (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Alexander the Great. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:47, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:1-1992a.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:1-1992a.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:1-1992a.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:1-1992b.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:1-1992b.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:1-1992b.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 14:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:10-1991a.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:10-1991a.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:10-1991a.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:10-1991b.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:10-1991b.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:10-1991b.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terve

Привет! Мы пока не знакомы. Я работаю в русскоязычной Википедии. Я начал работу по написанию статей об эстонских наградах и военной символике, но я испытываю Трудности в переводе. Не мог бы ты помочь мне в некоторых вопросах, а также в сборе информации. Можешь посмотреть мои статьи в русской Википедии. Как они тебе? Я мог бы помочь тебе в переводах с литовского языка, если хочешь. Успехов!--Kwasura (talk) 02:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonia-Ale Coq Football Arena in Tallinn.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonia-Ale Coq Football Arena in Tallinn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonia-Ale Coq Football Arena in Tallinn.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Samuel Harvey Shapiro.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Samuel Harvey Shapiro.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Samuel Harvey Shapiro.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Rein Taagepera.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Rein Taagepera.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rein Taagepera.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Paavo Järvi.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Paavo Järvi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Paavo Järvi.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Steven T. Jürvetson.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Steven T. Jürvetson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Steven T. Jürvetson.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonia-Tallinn after Soviet airattack-National Opera House.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonia-Tallinn after Soviet airattack-National Opera House.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonia-Tallinn after Soviet airattack-National Opera House.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonia-Tallinn after Soviet airattack-Harju Street.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonia-Tallinn after Soviet airattack-Harju Street.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonia-Tallinn after Soviet airattack-Harju Street.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonian-Ministry of Foreign Affairs.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonian-Ministry of Foreign Affairs.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonian-Ministry of Foreign Affairs.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonian-automobile-infrastructure.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonian-automobile-infrastructure.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonian-automobile-infrastructure.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonian-economy.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonian-economy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonian-economy.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Estonian soldiers in Afghanistan.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Estonian soldiers in Afghanistan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Estonian soldiers in Afghanistan.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 23:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Village pump". You can also leave a message on my talk page. BanRay 23:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Estonian-demographics.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Estonian-demographics.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eesti ajalugu ja propaganda

Holocaust ei tähenda suvalist massitapmist. Nimi tuleneb vanast kreeka keelest ja tähendab täielikku põletamist. Eeskätt kasutatakse seda III Reichi poolt läbi viidud juutide, mustlaste, homode jm inimgruppide hävitamisena. Nõustun Sinuga, et NSV Liidu inimohvrite arv on tunduvalt suurem, kuid see ei anna alust seda kutsuda holocaustiks. Termin nõukogude holokaust on puht propagandistlik. Esiteks, nagu ma seda sõna muutes toonitasin, ei sobi propaganda Wikipediasse. Sellisel juhul ei suudaks Peipsi tagant tulevaid artikleid kogu aeg parandadagi, vaid meid ujutataks üle propaganda tulvaga. Venekeelses Wikipedias on see juba täitsa toimumas. Teisalt ei ole propaganda ka Eesti seisu kohalt hea väljavaade. Lihtsakoeline propaganda töötab propagandisti vastu tihtipeale. Lisaks sellele me ei vaja seda. Meil on ju suuremalt jaolt õigus - NSV Liit viis läbi tohutud inimsusevastased kuriteod. Seega oleks hea poliitiliselt korrektseks jääda ja mitte lasta tunnetel enda üle võimus haaramast.

Loodan, et mõistad mu tagasihoidlikke seisukohti,
Alyster User talk:Alyster 20:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

)

A question

Hi, I've noticed you've been doing some good work on creating some articles on Estonian Navy ships. I wonder if you might be able to shed some light on a question I've raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Estonian Navy ships - EML or ENS? Kind regards, Benea (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BMP-1 in Estonia?

Hello!

The discussion about possible existence of BMP-1 IFVs in Estonian Army is interesting. From what I know Soviet/Russian motorized units stayed in Baltic republics (Baltic Military District) in 1980s-beg.1990s were equipped with quite many BMP-1, perhaps, a few could be left there after withdrawal of Russian units. But despite the fact that quite many Russian and foreign online sources mention that Estonian Army had(has) BMP-1 IFVs I never saw the exact number of BMP-1 in Estonian Army (if so).

The best Russian reference-books I have mention the following - Estonian Army has BTR-152 (4), BRDM-2 (7), MAMBA Alvis-4 (8), BTR-80 (75), Sisu XA-180 (57). BMP-1 is not mentioned.

I very much tend to believe at the moment that Estonia doesn't have BMP-1 IFVs.

Regards, Vladimir--Vladimir Historian (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Estonia did not declare the Soviet Army weapons and vehicles Estonian property in 1991 due to several factors unlike most of the former USSR countries - for example Georgia, Armenia etc. BTR-80s were obtained from a Soviet Russian higher officer living Estonia - the vehicles were taken by force as they possessed a threat and there was a serious weapon demand-need among the restored Estonia Defence Forces. During the Soviet occupation there were numerous tanks, infantry, motorized infantry, air force strategic bomber, navy, submarine and also nuclear units in Estonia. There might be some BMP-1 vehicles only on the test grounds and firing sectors for practice targets though I doubt seriously about that. BMP type of machines entered 1991, during the Moscow Coup, Estonia - and a lot of these machines were deserted near the Tallinn-Narva highway as they broke down during the drive towards Tallinn. I have not found any records about that some of those broke machines would have been taken into the EDF machine park. In 1994 when the Soviet - now already under a new name Russian Army left Estonia, all the machinery was taken along. One of the reasons why Estonia did not declare these weapons as a property of the republic was a reason that Estonia then would have had to buy spare parts and ammunition from Russia for a long time to come. The second main reason was that the soviet machinery was considered very low quality and high cost to upkeep them.

The BTR-152 and BRDM-2 is also a very mysterious thing as there are no official numbers about those vehicles - I have seen some photos from military parades in other cities where such machines are on the parades - that proofs that these machines really are in active use. On the second hand no website has ever presented them - army ones I mean. The real number of BTR-80s is also questionable as I have heard from some soldiers and officers in the forums that most of these machines exist only on papers and around 20-30 are in fighting condition. The Mamba Alvis number is 9 instead of 8. Xa-180 used to be 60 now there 57 left as 3 were lost during the Afghanistan war which still keeps going on. Recently Sweden has offered 350 BMP-1 vehicles to any foreign country which would buy minimum 50 of those. If Estonia would obtain some of those well-preserved-modernized BMP-1 then they would be the first ones to arrive and wear Estonian colors - very unlikely to happen though. Thanks for writing and giving information!Karabinier (talk) 14:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the interesting information. I just don't agree with claimed low quality of Soviet AFVs because it is better in some aspects than of corresponding NATO AFVs but with one important assumption - trained technical service which was (and is) quite often neglected in Soviet/Russian Army. Regards, Vladimir--Vladimir Historian (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Do you have any information about the rumored two North Korean BMP-1 IFVs which were supposed to be used as decoration?

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ones more for today :) The complete info about Soviet units (all belonged to 144th Guard motorized rifle Elna division) of Baltic Military District which located in Estonia and had BMP-1 based vehicles (service data of the Ministry of Defense of USSR for the end of 1990). There were no BMP-1 IFVs in Estonian SSR indeed that time.

1. 182nd Guard motorized rifle regiment (Klooga) - 2 BRM-1K
2. 188th Guard motorized rifle regiment (Klooga) - 2 BRM-1K
3. 254th Guard motorized rifle regiment named for A.M. Matrosov (Tallinn) - 2 BRM-1K, 2 PRP-4
4. 228th tank regiment (Keila) - 2 BRM-1K, 2 BMP-1KSh
5. 450th artillery regiment (Klooga) - 1 PRP-4
6. 148th independent recon battalion (Klooga) - 7 BRM-1K
7. 295th independent engineer battalion (Klooga) - 2 IRM

Regards, Vladimir--Vladimir Historian (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Estonian BMP-1 rumor

Hello.

Do you have any information about the rumored two North Korean BMP-1 IFVs which were supposed to be~bought by Estonia to be used as decoration?

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 14:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

emm...Estonia does not have any relations with North Korea - no diplomatic, no military or social ones. Its a joke legend if its a legend at all. Karabinier (talk) 21:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ARM-helicopter-unit.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ARM-helicopter-unit.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]