Jump to content

User talk:201.220.215.13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by J.delanoy (talk | contribs) at 01:53, 4 November 2008 (Message re. Latin American School of Medicine (Cuba) (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Category:Cuban models has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bexample\.com' .

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kirk Douglas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Weeliljimmy talk 01:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rhesus blood group system has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. LeaveSleaves (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Battle of Mir Ali has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  15:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of Italian football transfers summer 2008 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 06:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Saat Phere has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 23:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bannu District has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —ossmanntalk 20:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on North Waziristan worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. La Pianista (T•C•S•R) 20:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Beliamen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. La Pianista (T•C•S•R) 20:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Latin American School of Medicine (Cuba). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FlyingToaster (talk) 23:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Re: Beyonce question

There is no official tracklisting but the title is rumored to be "Virtuoso Intellect" or "Beesting". Some of the users are making up tracks that are not real. But she confirmed "Single Ladies" and "If I Were A Boy" were the first singles. I posted the real tracklisting up there but it was erased. Readyseason (talk) 23:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Allegra Coleman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. HiDrNick! 03:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Battagram District has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pakistan Medical and Dental Council has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MatthewYeager 22:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rajanpur District has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   jj137 (talk) 02:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Guyana has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 00:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Chess articles

Thanks for your recent interest in Chess articles, including details of Capablanca's family life. However some of your other edits were not quite so good - the normal practice is to wikilink a name or technical term only the first time it appears in a section, so that the page does not look like it has blue pox. Don't worry about the links you've already made, as they will be sorted out when articles are reviewed or prepared for review. -- Philcha (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take heed of the advice given by Philcha above. Repeated linking will be reverted and simply takes up editor's time. Many thanks. Brittle heaven (talk) 14:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The articles are OK. The links are OK. Is not repeated linking. Many articles contain several links in order to save work to the reader in order to give a near link. Users will not have to go all over the page and search to visit the page. I am doing a great job of linking what can't be done blindly by a robot. As a matter of fact. Yes I'm changing a lot of chess articles as a matter of fact too. Is wikipedia. Deal with people improving the articles. Thanks.

This is not constructive. Wishing to promote your favourite player is not a good enough reason to flout the guidance given in the Manual of Style. You say you are helping the reader who might have a long search for the link, but that's not true. Many of your repeated links are very close to the original link. Anyway, the MoS accounts for this 'distance factor' when it specifically permits repetition to assist readers who may arrive via an internal link, or for placement within a table—unfortunately these are not instances that apply to your edits. Brittle heaven (talk) 14:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(links)#Overlinking_and_underlinking and Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context. Bubba73 (talk), 15:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Latin American School of Medicine (Cuba) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 01:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:201.220.215.13&oldid=249549749"