Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ceiling Cat (talk | contribs) at 04:06, 24 November 2008 (Articles created/expanded on November 23). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rincón Chileno
Rincón Chileno

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Instructions

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • When nominating, please use a level 4 header with the nominated article's name. Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 16}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined. You may use {{DYKproblem}} to notify the nominator
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix. You may use {{DYKproblem}} to notify the nominator
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Next update

The next update will be produced from queue 3.

There are five queues;

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on November 24

File:Jack Kemp.jpg
Hook more than 200 characters, and qualifying article needs to be in bold.Cbl62 (talk) 03:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bolded it. But the hook is still long. —Politizer talk/contribs 03:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article by Rlendog is quite good, but one other issue is that the hook is more focused on being a mini-bio of Jack Kemp than it is with the topic of the featured article -- AFC champions. How about the following alternatives.
or
or
Front and side view of the Plymouth Cathedral
Front and side view of the Plymouth Cathedral

Articles created/expanded on November 23

File:Proailurus.jpg
  • ...that the Cat gap is a period in the fossil record of approximately 25 to 17 million years ago in which there are few cats or cat-like species.
Is someone's autobiography a reliable source? Are there any better independent sources out there? – How do you turn this on (talk) 23:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is the best I can find; only the first four pages or so are autobiographical (he died before he could write the rest). I've deliberately stripped out all the opinion-based dross and only included facts he'd have no reason to exaggerate (birth, year of graduation, place of graduation, so on). Ironholds (talk) 00:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but the first hook is too long and confusing. I had to stare at it for a while just to wrap my mind around what it was trying to say. —Politizer talk/contribs 17:16, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New try: ... that the 1921 congress of the Marxist Left in Slovakia and the Transcarpathian Ukraine endorsed all 21 conditions of Comintern, except the one demanding use of the name 'Communist Party'? --Soman (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 22

Diamphidia nigroornata, Larve
Diamphidia nigroornata, Larve
The subject of the article has questionable notability in terms of WP:BIO, a possible AfD candidate. Of the two footnotes one does not mention him and the other is a short entry from some sort of SS personell list. All of the information in the article comes from this personell list entry. Nsk92 (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Alt)... that the fungi Podaxis is often used for face paint by the Australian Aborigines? Imperat§ r(Talk) 00:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kumusi River from overhead
Kumusi River from overhead
  • ... that Phil Ochs described "Power and the Glory" as "the greatest song I'll ever write"? -- new article self-nom by — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 21:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Did he reach 4-star while a PoW? or after release? This hook sounds a bit ambiguous. Suggest "former Vietnam War prisoner of war". --74.13.129.234 (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reached it after - which is clear in the article, both in the introduction and service history and ranks. However, to my knowledge, with any interpretation, I think it is true... to my knowledge, no 4-stars held POW and none advanced to 4-star while captive. I've added an alternative hook, though I think both are valid. — ERcheck (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, 97198 and BorgQueen. The suggested alt hook is fine with me. I'm not 100% sure what the article should be called - "40 foot telescope" is more a descriptive name than anything, but seems to be the standard. I'm unsure whether it should have a dash between "40" and "foot"; have created a redirect with the dash in for now. Mike Peel (talk) 08:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
100 McAllister Street, San Francisco CA
100 McAllister Street, San Francisco CA
140 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia
140 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia

Articles created/expanded on November 21

  • Length and creation date verified. It might be my own browser, but your ref for the hook fact doesn't seem to work. Could you maybe replace the URL with something that's more permenant than a search result (which it looks like)? Thanks, JamieS93 20:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Pls note that DYK hooks should be in the form of a question. --74.13.129.234 (talk) 19:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the period after "breast" to a colon, which I believe satisfies the objection above. Art LaPella (talk) 03:36, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's awkward even with the colon, though. How about: ... that suffragist Lady Constance Lytton carved the letter "V" (for "Votes for Women") into her breast using a piece of broken enamel from a hairpin? —Politizer talk/contribs 03:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Politizer's version gets my vote. Autodidactyl (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that suffragist Lady Constance Lytton carved the letter "V" (for "Votes for Women") into her breast using a piece of broken enamel from a hairpin?
Interesting that with the words "new article self nominated by Doug Coldwell" my Microsoft Word program counts it as 235 and without those words it says the hook by itself is 199.
Took out over fifty characters - the ALT should be within limits now. How many do you count now? "The Star Spangled Banner?" counts as 24.--Doug Coldwell talk 19:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I count 235 for the original version ("new article ... " doesn't count but spaces between words do count), and 176 for the ALT. Art LaPella (talk) 03:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OR
  • ... that Chicago hairstylist John Lanzendorf owned one of the world's largest collections of dinosaur-themed artwork? (self-nom) The first ref is not available for free online, but says this: "Take John Lanzendorf, a Chicago hairstylist, who began buying dinosaurs (plastic ones) when he was 9 years old. Now, 40 years later, after much research, many lectures and meetings and much traveling, his is among the largest collections of dinosaur fine art in the world, says Donald Glut, an expert on dinosaurs and author of more than 25 books on the subject." Zagalejo^^^ 00:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 20

  • ... that Lucky Dragons have not only released 19 albums, but also run an art society called Sumi Ink Club and an internet community called Glaciers of Nice? -- new article self-nom by Seraphim.
  • This was a previously deleted article, which I undeleted on the 20th (logs can verify this), so technically it's a new article. Either way, it has still been expanded over five-fold from the original prose (403 characters to 3403). Seraphim 18:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"made up many of the members"? They told tall tales about amazing teammates after coming back from the tour? --74.13.129.234 (talk) 19:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mmmmm. I was trying to avoid structuring the sentence the other way round, because "tribe" or "clan" or "people" don't really sound right, but this is the alternative:
As usual, 74's suggestion sounds better. --BorgQueen (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --74.13.129.234 (talk) 19:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Will Venable
Will Venable
But, imo, Max is not famous enough for this purpose. Mentioning Max is actually an unnecessary distraction. Ditto for mentioning Chris Young, unless the hook is rephrased to focus both youngsters. --74.13.129.234 (talk) 21:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Although this is unflattering info about a living person, I think it's more than adequately cited and doesn't give it undue weight (it seems to be the source of his greatest notoriety), so meets DYK's standards for inclusion. Nevertheless, I can also put forward this alternative:
For those who don't speak French, the hook is cited in the La Dépêche du Midi reference: "le plus grand réseau de transport d'Europe", "the biggest transmission network in Europe". The 100,000km part is in references #1 and #5. — BillC talk 03:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 19

Suggest: "spoke" --> "delivered". --74.14.18.119 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which nation? Suggest "nationwide" --> "across the U.S." --74.13.129.234 (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jelani Jenkins? Who? You're not going to connect with too many readers on the main page. --74.14.18.119 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The hook isn't really about the bolded article either; it's about the Jenkins guy. Could work if he had his own article and it was a double-nom. —97198 (talk) 11:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Done. (The Wiktionary link was mine, because I didn't understand the Britishism.) Art LaPella (talk) 23:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
May need to mention that he grew up to become a notable shooter. Right now, the hook only says he was a naughty kid. --74.13.129.234 (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt: that while the fictional British soldier George Hysteron-Proteron was still in the cot, he shot his nanny in the backside with a pea-shooter? – How do you turn this on (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on November 18

  • I've only had good experiences with Gothamist sites. As you said, the author's not an self-publishing blogger - "Chicagoist's own political writer" (Kevin Robinson) does imply that he's being paid for what he's writing and thus he probably knows his stuff. —97198 (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with a gothamist cite, but the statement for the nomination about the "authority" of the a ward committeeman seems a bit misleading. In fact, I don't think the article asserts such a statement. The article uses the term "influence". The one place that the article uses the word "authority" is not entirely correct anyway. There is no defined structure in the city charter or the party by-laws that says a committeeperson controls Ward X while the alderman controls Ward Y. Frankly they can be the same person. The committeeperson's "official" authority is pretty much always the same. They vote to endorse candidates and work for the party. The alderman is a member of the city council and has the authority as befits that office. I guess this sounds a bit nitpicky, but now that I have written it, I might as well post it. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) ] 23:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kuroda Sayako
Kuroda Sayako
  • The article says Israelis won't let Arabs live there permanently, and Israelis turned a Muslim shrine into a Jewish shrine. Please forgive my unfamiliarity with Mideast politics, but neither the hook nor the article answers this question: Do the Israelis forbid Muslims from making their pilgrimage anyway? Art LaPella (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Art LaPella. If I may, I think the festival just ended because in the wake of 1948 war, the 150,000 Arabs that remained within Israel and became citizens, needed travel permits to go from place to place. Israel was under Martial law#Israel. That would make getting 30,000 people together to go to a festival rather difficult since I doubt all 30,000 would be able to get a permit at the time. So though there may very well have been no official proclamation cancelling the festival, it would have been impossible to organize under the general circumstances. Note that martial law continued until 1967, and by that time, people would have gotten used to not having the festival and it would be difficult to reignite the tradition. Just my two cents. Tiamuttalk 17:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I sort of revised the "pilgrimage" part of the hook to reflect that in the article. In the Benvenisti source, it says it was not celebrated in the year of the war, but does not say if Muslims were forbidden to visit it. I'm sure they're allowed, but a festival of even close to such magnitude hasn't occurred since the village's capture. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the article mentions that most of the pilgrims came from the surrounding cities like Lydda, Ramleh and Jaffa. In those cities *at least* 90 % of the Arab population were expelled (outside Israels borders). So of the 30 000 people who attended pre-1948, only, say, a maximum of 2-3000 would have a theoretical possibility to attend post-48. And as Tiamut mentions above: they all needed travelling-permit. And from what I have read about those times: they were very difficult times for the non-Jews of Israel, I think celebrating at festivals was very low on their list of priorities. Regards, Huldra (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 17

  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues "Fourth growth" is still uninformative for people who aren't wine connoisseurs. I assume it means pretty high quality, but I dunno. Try suggesting an alt hook that expresses that more clearly, without using jargon. —Politizer talk/contribs 07:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
José María Rojas Garrido
José María Rojas Garrido
I found a source confirming his assumptions (he actually assumed the office a few years ealier as well for only 6 days) and the dates but its in a list of rulers and doesn't explain the reason why he assumed office.Nrswanson (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I left a message for the nominator a day and a half ago. I'll wait another 24 hours before taking further action. —Politizer talk/contribs 01:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 16

Valvata utahensis
Valvata utahensis
Article incorporates text from two PD sources. I don't think DYK has official rules on that, but because of my personal stance on the whole PD yada yada thing I can't ever verify a hook that copies text from somewhere else. If someone else disagrees then feel free to go over my head and verify this hook, but if no one else chooses to verify this hook then I guess that's that. (If you do, however, also note that the hook could be clarified a little more; "extirpated" might not be a very common word.) —Politizer talk/contribs 06:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Species recovery plan is the best reference (it is written by experts and verified by public and approved by USFWS) and there is no need to verify the plan. There is need to verify that the hook is written in the plan and it is all right. Should I add this reference at the end of every sentence that uses text from this recovery plan? (It is important for me, because I always use texts from a public domain source.) As for the word "extirpated", I am not native English speaker. I think it is a good word, see article local extinction, but you can use also "locally extincted" instead of it. --Snek01 (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Next time I will explain where wikipedians verifying hooks can verify it. OK? For now it is here, on page 6. --Snek01 (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is not easy! Page 6 or the article does not mention "roundmouth" or even round & mouth, so I try the latin name ... still not found. I then read the whole of page 6 as requested and the only thing I can find is a "Utah valvata snail" which an expert might tell me has a round mouth, but how do I know? Maybe I missed it, but the word "expirated" was not obvios either or even that they were "locally extinct" ... it just tald about them being endangered. Pleased to see you say you will think about the person checking the hooks as at the memont you are keeping them/us busy. Victuallers (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, counted page 6 is in that PDF on page 17 of the file. And you are lucky that the file is on the internet so you can verify it so easy. And about the word: so readers will know the new word if they do not already know it. It is encyclopedia for. --Snek01 (talk) 15:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, a good hook should be comprehensible to readers without them needing to click on any links (other than the main one) for background information. Sometimes that's impossible, of course, but it is something to aim for. If a technical term can be replaced with an easier one, that's usually a good thing. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Roundmouth does not appear anywhere in the .pdf file that is on the internet. A search for Utah roundmouth snail in Google scholar, books, and news has no indication that the name of the snail is the Utah roundmouth snail. The .pdf file did say "Recent mollusc surveys throughout Utah revealed no live snails, and the species is believed to be extirpated there (Clarke 1991)," which seems different from the hook. -- Suntag 08:34, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


See also