Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations | Pickbothmanlol

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by A1a8s (talk | contribs) at 00:13, 15 April 2009 (→User:Pickbothmanlol). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Pickbothmanlol

Pickbothmanlol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Pickbothmanlol

Pickbothmanlol (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date February 13 2009, 17:39 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Wuhwuzdat (talk)

same pattern of vandalism only activity, as user:Double Uncle Spit Roast Generator exhibited yesterday, both show quite a bit of knowledge of wikipedia procedures, especially for newbies Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

I checked my contributions and his contribrutions.However he never purposed a article to become a policy or guideline.Your evidence is flawed. Pickbothmanlol (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And his block log states the words "account creation blocked" with the date of 13 Febuary 2009. I am not him and memberly close this case. Pickbothmanlol (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

17:55, 13 February 2009 PhilKnight (Talk | contribs) blocked We are not perfect but we should try (Talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Vandalism)

Is this all you have on me? Just assume good faith and accpect the fact that I am not a sockpuppet.Pickbothmanlol (talk)

Comments by other users

This user behavior is consistant with accused sock behavior. Checkuser will confirm. Garycompugeek (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Synergy 16:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions



Report date February 24 2009, 02:12 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


IP says all

Evidence submitted by A1a6s (talk) 02
12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by A1a6s (talk) 02:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 02:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Conclusions
  •  Confirmed the following:
  1. A1a4s (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. A1a6s (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. PurposeAutoBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. SPCUClerksbot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. PlaystationBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. AndyCrogonka (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  7. PickbothBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  8. Pickbothmanlol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  9. AndyBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  10. AndysCrogz1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  11. AndyzBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  12. A1a2s (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  13. AndyCrogonka (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  14. PSPBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  15. Dsaasdasdboz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  16. AltecCrog (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  17. PSNMand (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  18. ClueBot XX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  19. JamesAltec12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  20. PlaystationBot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  21. JamieAhoy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  22. Attguylol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  23. BobbyCro (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  24. HPNMan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

One IP range blocked. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 04:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Mayalld (talk) 07:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date February 28 2009, 01:02 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Wronkiew (talk)


SNESCDADDON has expanded on the guideline page Wikipedia:Casual, created by confirmed puppeteer Pickbothmanlol. He and NUsedBot also vandalized Template:Wikipedia ads. Creation of NUsedBot was claimed by AltecCrog (talk · contribs), a confirmed puppet of Pickbothmanlol. SNESCDADDON's first edits were to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Warady and Joel Warady Group, indicating he was familiar with ongoing controversy. Also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/72.54.210.49, indicating he understands sockpuppet policy. NUsedBot is already blocked for a violation of bot policy. Requesting CU because these accounts were created to evade the indefinite block on the original account. Wronkiew (talk) 01:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Wronkiew (talk) 01:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Nothing to see here folks. Foxy Loxy Pounce! 09:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date March 10 2009, 19:52 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by —Snigbrook

The new user AltecLansing12 (talk · contribs) has made edits to pages such as User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU, which have previously been vandalised by A1a6s (talk · contribs) who is a sock of Pickbothmanlol (talk · contribs). The user has also attempted to disrupt a bot with this edit: [1], and has created User:AltecLansing12/Casual which is almost identical to User:Pickbothmanlol/Casual. Other similarities are an interest in User:Grawp[2][3], and User:Ananny[4][5], and a similar username to AltecCrog (talk · contribs) who is already blocked as a suspected sock of User:Pickbothmanlol. —Snigbrook 19:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

I am a sockpuppet but the edits on this account arent all completely vandalism.I did tag some articles that had no content or were just plain nonsense that can hint good faith but yes I am afraid I have to admit I am a sock. AltecLansing12 (talk) 20:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

Obvious sock - WP:DUCK. Now blocked with an expiry time of indefinite. --Kanonkas :  Talk  20:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date March 12 2009, 15:27 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


This user's relation to Grawp can be found in the history of Dsaasdasdboz's contributions and deleted contribrutions but I doubt that account is a true sock of Grawp.

Evidence submitted by WheresDaSockAccountz11 (talk) 15
27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: given the history of this sockmaster disrupting SPI, I suspect that the reporter may be worth a look as a sock! Mayalld (talk) 16:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Closing out case with this edit. Nishkid confirmed filer as Pickbothmanlol in block log. Synergy 20:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date March 19 2009, 14:45 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Mayalld (talk)


  •  Clerk note: Already blocked. Filing to keep the record up to date. Typical behaviour in trying to break WP:SPI
Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Completed already blocked as a sock. Mayalld (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Mayalld (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date April 15 2009, 00:11 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets

Self-reporting because this account is going to deal with Simple Wikipedia instead of this Wikipedia.

Evidence submitted by A1a8s (talk) 00
11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions




User:Petunia465

Petunia465 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Pickbothmanlol

Pickbothmanlol (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 20 2009, 06:28 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Most of these are already blocked, some are not.


Evidence submitted by Wronkiew (talk)


Interest in User:Kralizec! by both 75.175.233.227 and Petunia465, second edit by Petunia465 was to User talk:75.175.233.227. Both Schoolblock and Petunia465 have attempted to disrupt WP:UAA by posting already blocked usernames. Petunia465 is probably not the original puppeteer, but I've run out of time tonight to investigate this. Wronkiew (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Requests fro CheckUser
Checkuser request – code letter: B  + F (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and another reason)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.Mayalld (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk endorsed to check for potential link to Pickbothmanlol (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), and if related to look for a potential range for hardblock. Mayalld (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
  •  Confirmed - Petunia465 = Schoolblock == the IP listed above & the additional users I listed above
  •  Likely - that they are Pickbothmanlol socks, based mainly on editing behavior.. the IPs differ from the usual geolocation for Pickbothmanlol.
  •  IP blocked - I've hardblocked a /19 for a month. The IP range is fairly quiet except for this sockmaster --Versageek 13:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    All blocked. --Kanonkas :  Talk  14:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date March 27 2009, 22:18 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets

Both use similar stylesheets to vandalize multiple wikis including this one.

Evidence submitted by Golder1234 (talk) 22
18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)



Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions

 Completed the usual helpful Pickbothmanlol, vandalising SPI templates,then reporting himself. Mayalld (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Mayalld (talk) 09:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pickbothmanlol/Archive&oldid=283896100"