User talk:Schmeater

Welcome!

Hello, Schmeater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

That Hello Schmeater welcome to Wikipedia thingy mabobber is just something to keep memories I don't like it.

Some quick points

I've reverted a number of edits because:

We don't add plot when the issues haven't been published - solicitations don't count as sources
We use the cover dates, which run two months ahead of the date the issue is released

Hope that helps explain my edits.

I also suspect that the "People who I know that are annoying" section on your user page violates WP:USER, specifically WP:UP#NOT #5 and 10. (Emperor (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can a human tell me next time Sine.--Schmeater (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: the Blackest Night: Batman AfD

Read up on how AfDs work.

Just because you believe you've gotten the last word in does not mean you "win".

Generally they stay open for about a week at which point an admin, generally an uninvolved one, looks at what the editors who've commented have said. Evaluates it. And determines one of three results:

Keep either by virtue strong arguments based on policy/guidelines or consensus;
Delete/rename either by virtue strong arguments based on policy/guidelines or consensus; or
No consensus either way.

Since the AfD went up on the 2nd, it likely won't close before the 9th or 10th.

Now, some of how you've gone about things deserve comment on the AfD page.

- J Greb (talk) 20:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Red Robin

Done. The main problem I'm noticing in your edits isn't the content for the most part, it's basically just formatting. In most cases you don't need to add extraneous details like what story a particular title is tying into, usually you just add a link to the story itself and let the reader figure it out. As a pointer you might want to look over some WikiProject Comics policies in your spare time and just look at the formatting of some good articles to see how it's done.

Any other advice, let me know. --CmdrClow (talk) 04:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot Friend

My stupid friend did this on my computer. Made an acount on my computer. I try to apologize for his behaviour and I get blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Schmeater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

174.1.80.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hate J Greb". The reason given for Hate J Greb's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".

Blocking administrator: J Greb (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Looks like you were too closely involved. Toddst1 (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will this unblock me will it. I hope it does and if it does I want an administrator to delete Hate J Greb.

So this had nothing to do with this dispute?--chaser (talk) 04:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't even me. I was eating food when he was doing this. I don't know why he does this. He's too portective. I mean a guy swore at me he beat that guy up. I really think that J Greb won the fight for Blackest Night: Batman fair and square. Now if this explains enough I would like Hate J Greb deleted and for me to be unblocked. --Schmeater (talk) 01:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you file an RFCU if you're so sure? Toddst1 (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blackest Night: Crossovers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blackest Night: Crossovers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

lacks references, no indication of how this is notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 03:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blackest Night: Batman

The problem is they have a point - this largely spins off from Batman RIP and the tie-in with BftC is pretty minimal.

Please take this to the talk page at Talk:Batman: Battle for the Cowl#Blackest Night tie-in as you are edit warring with the other editor and are bordering on WP:3RR. If you both continue this warnings can be issued and/or the article locked until this is resolved. (Emperor (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Enigma^msg 05:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]