Jump to content

Colonel Mordaunt's Cock Match

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Victuallers (talk | contribs) at 14:22, 30 April 2010 (versions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Antoine Polier - OrientalistHassan Resa KhanbackgroundNawab Salar JungClaude Martin - Soldier and polymathNawab Wazir of OudhColonel John MordauntCol. Mordaunt's cockfighterOzias Humphrey - PainterCockfightingJohn Wombwell - East India Co. accountantMr OrrMr. Robert GregoryLieutenant Golding - East India Co. EngineerSeated figureUnknownZoffany - the artistCockfighterMr Gregory's cockfighterUse a cursor to explore or click for larger image
Colonel Mordaunt's cockfight by Johann Zoffany - Some can be identified by hovering the mouse pointer over different individuals in the painting.[1]

Colonel Mordaunt's Cock Match is a painting by Johann Zoffany. The painting records British colonial life in the Indian court of Asaf-Ud-Dowlah. The painting is part of the Tate Gallery collection. The painting was completed in February 1788, four years after the event it records. A recent cleaning has revealed the original colours and the arousal of the central figure.[1]

History

Johann Zoffany was a German born painter who had become a successful portrait painter in London. Among his principal patrons were the royal family. Queen Charlotte had sent Zoffany to Florence where he had agreed to paint the Tribuna of the Uffizi. The agreed price was high and he was paid £300 a year.[2] Zoffany stayed seven years. On his return he brought for Queen Charlotte the painting of The Tribuna of the Uffizi that included within the body of the Uffizi a number of British residents in Florence. The painting but it received a cool reception because it included fpeople who were not considered appropriate or desirable. Against advice, Zoffany had included people such as Sir Horace Mann, 1st Baronet, British consul at Florence, and the painter Thomas Patch.[2] (Patch had been thrown out of Rome for a homosexual act). At this time homosexuality was illegal in the eyes of both the church and the state.

One figure who was thought acceptable was George Nassau Clavering-Cowper, 3rd Earl Cowper. Although Cowper is shown on the left of the painting contemplating the aesthetic virtues of the Niccolini-Cowper Madonna - which Zoffany eventually sold to him.

A watercolour which is thought to also show this cock fight, painted about 1830.[3]

Zoffany had to leave the country as all of his usual commissions were no longer forthcoming. He never again got a royal commission.[2] He had hoped to sail with Captain Cook, but as a second choice he elected to make the long jouney to Lucknow. His fellow painter, Ozias Humphrey was already making portraits of the wealthy employees of the British East India Company and the Indian princes. He may have told Zoffany of the opportunities available in Lucknow.

In Lucknow, Zoffany met the main players at the court. The nominal head of the State of Oudh was Asaf-Ud-Dowlah, although the governor Warren Hastings was the British representative. He commanded the power of the British East India Company, and it was Hastings who commissioned the painting of the cockmatch by Zoffany.[4] In the event, Hastings was summoned back to England to face charges of corruption laid by Edmund Burke which took years to dismiss.

Versions

The Ashwick version - the original is lost

There are at least two different versions of the painting of the cock match. The two attributed to Zoffany are the Daylesford version (above) and the Ashwick version. Both are clearly the same composition but the Daylesford version contains many more background figures and subtle variations in who is included and how they are arranged.[5]

The Daylesford painting was sent back to England when it was complete. There is a story that the painting was lost at sea and recreated later by Zoffany but that is not now thought to be true.[5] However there are other studies of the same subject. About 1790 a key was published which identifies many people in the painting.[6] There is an engraving by Richard Earlom which is well known. Less well known is a painting from the Indian court which seems to show the same subject matter.[3]

People in the painting(s)

Both of Zoffany's versions of the painting show at their centre Asaf-Ud-Dowlah, the Nawab. This man was held in very low regard, but he was the nominal head of state. His favourites included Colonel John Mordaunt and Claude Martin. Mordaunt was the illegitimate and nearly illiterate son of the Earl of Peterborough. He had managed to be assigned to Warren Hastings and through him he was appointed head of security. His real role however included organising entertainments.[5] Mordaunt and his employer were said to have shown the same low tastes in entertainment. Even at that time, cockfighting was not well regarded in British society. Mordaunt had arranged for British birds to be brought to India, where he used them to take on local cockerels.[1]

Claude Martin was a Frenchman who had switched sides to the British. Martin was clever and skilful. Martin is shown on the right sitting on a couch. Martin's contemporaries included in both versions of the paintinng include the Frenchman Antoine Polier. Polier made his fortune in Lucknow which he took back to France. He was unlucky enough to arrive in the middle of the French Revolution and he was stabbed to death at Poitiers for being a noble. Wombwell was the local paymaster.[1]

Zoffany is included in the painting as is Ozias Humphrey. although in the Ashwick version Zoffany is more surreptitious and the figure of Humphrey has been thought to be a Lieutenant Humphrey. Both versions include a scene where a Moslem young boy is being publicly groped by a Hindu man. A nearby spectator appears to be held back from expressing his indignation. Another detail is the sexual arousal of Asaf-Ud-Dowlah. This detail is said to be more obvious now that the painting has been cleaned. Some say this may be Warren Hastings' joke to show the Nawab of Awadh in this way. His homosexuality is well recorded. His favourite, Hassan Raza Khan, is the figure in the red turban who is at the centre of the scene. He is said to have hundreds of wives who he ignored and he died without children.[1]

Claude Martin in a letter to Ozias Humphrey made an interesting observation on Colonal Mordaunt's role:

Colonel Mordaunt is now at the vizier's court, hunting, fighting cocks and doing all he can to please the Nabob in the expectation of being paid the large sums due to him by the Prince... although the Prince has dark and sinister intentions, but I fear much of his success, as the vizier is not much willing to pay his debts particularly to Europeans for what I know of his character I think it such that if one could read in his heart then one would perceive it loaded with many dark and sinister intentions and as you know those that conpose his court you then ought to know man he is. A man that delight in elephants and cock fighting would delight in much worse if he feared nothing[7]

Today

The surviving painting today is part of the collection at the Tate Gallery in London. A recent cleaning of the painting revealed the original colours and detail that had been lost. One of the details revealled was the sexual arousal of the central figure as he reaches for his minister. One source presumes that this is Warren Hastings' joke.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Colonel Mordaunt's Cock Match  circa 1784-6, Terry Riggs, October 1997, Tate.org.uk, accessed April 2010
  2. ^ a b c Tribuna of the Uffizi, Royal Collection, accessed April 2010
  3. ^ a b Asif ud-Daulah, Columbia.edu, accessed April 2010
  4. ^ Indian Life and Landscapes by Western Artists, Pauline Rohatgi et al., Chapter 4, accessed April 2010
  5. ^ a b c John Zoffany, R.A. His Life and Works : 1735-1810, accessed April 2010
  6. ^ Key to the painting
  7. ^ Indian Renaissance: British romantic art and the prospect of India, Hermione De Almeida, George H. Gilpin, 2005, p.77, accessed April 2010