User talk:Lancashirehotpot

Speedy deletion declined: Robin Drinkall

I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robin Drinkall, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Other users (Anon) have added substantial content. Nancy ^talk 10:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

Please do not blank Robin Drinkall again. User:Lancashirehotpot is not the only substantial contributor to that article and so there is no grounds in policy for you to blank it. If you do I will have no option but to block you from editing. Nancy ^talk 10:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I have reported you for your edits on Robin Drinkall, since I placed a final warning on your talk page previously (which since you have removed). Regards. Claritas (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nancy ^talk 10:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lancashirehotpot is the author of Robin Drinkall and requests the page be removed today. There are no objections to the removal..... Get on with it!

As has alrady been mentioned twice above, User:Lancashirehotpot is not the only substantial contributor to Robin Drinkall, therefore the article does not qualify to be deleted by author request. Your block will expire before the deletion discussion ends so you will be able to participate and make your views known there soon enough. Kind regards, Nancy ^talk 10:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]