Talk:Comparison of Usenet newsreaders

Quality/reliability

Added search engine retention / price but it is difficult to take into account quality/uptime which is quite different without giving preferentials.

Header download support column added - the basic feature is sometimes dropped from later nzb downloaders while calling the program a newsreader so a distinction should be made here as well.

File joining was a feature since the past millenium, it can be found everywhere except mail specialized clients like outlook express, so in fact we have "yes" almost everywhere even when not stated, so I strongly feel the column should be omitted, an unnecessary triviality.

Reliability / RAM utilization effectiveness also drastically differs in order of tens of times, it is of little use to have a newsreader which will bring your system to its knees while with another one running it won't be felt at all, but we have the same predicament of looking biased if to try to classify that, especially older clients have much higher RAM consumption for the same header volume. Maybe to add RAM signature when loading a newsgroup with, say, 10M headers (not relevant for nzb clients though).

It is good the wiki entry has been added, but it needs some work, what we have on the web is mostly affiliation/advertising.

Other columns which could be added are combining headers from different servers, virtual groups, combining files into collections (like binsearch) etc.

Sources?

Hi guys, I am the original author of this comparison and am wondering just what sources should be cited?

I based this comparison on similar articles such as Comparison of P2P applications and Comparison of IRC clients All software information is verifiable on the site of the program in question. --Fittysix 01:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Eventual replacement for List of news clients

I've made this to be similar to the format used with other mediums where a comparison seems to be favored over a simple list. --Fittysix 01:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

More fields

Columns to add:

yENC support, Ability to post articles y/n, uploading capability y/n

Focus on binaries?

The fields seem to be mostly about the use for downloading binaries over usenet. Maybe the list should consider traditional Usenet a bit more. A second table could be made for that. Possible fields would be "killfiling", "scoring" (or generally "filtering"), "newsrc syncronization", "offline reading" and so on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.192.47.17 (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Integrated Search Service

Can we have a short description on the meaning and implications of Integrated Search Service? What does retention refer to? Is $$$/yr a subscription fee?

Removal of Newsreaders

Why have so many programs been removed? Some, including URD, HAD Wikipedia articles that were deleted. This list is meant to compare ALL available usenet newsreaders, not just the ones whose Wikipedia entries haven't been deleted yet.

I propose they be added back in, but without linking them. In the mean time, I can start work on articles for the readers that don't already have them.

If others are in agreement, I'll add them back manually, as opposed to simply rolling back edits so newer changes don't get written over. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.37.51 (talk) 02:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

ok, then write the articles and I will bring back the infos if they have already existed! in other comparisons are the same politics! I'm a regular contributor of the comparisons of layout engines, irc clients, bittorrent clinets, web browsers, internet suites, and many more (i had to look up if you are interested): if in these categories are allowed to publish other clients, than there is the big problem that nobody can easy check if that is not spam. on the other hand why not write an article? if the client is good / have many users than there will be a fanbase who will write an article (it doesn't matter if it is a sub) mabdul 0=* 11:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Focus on text-based

If there's any software that begs for a text-based user interface, it's this software! Although I'm disappointed by the paucity of choices and lack of sophistication, I'd certainly like to see a page like this one, but devoted to TUI newsreaders alone, perhaps set up as a table showing information copied from this one. 4.234.36.32 (talk) 15:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC) (It's me; I forgot to log in!) Unfree (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

after christmas i wanted to expand this comparison like i did on the expansion of the list of bittorrent clinets If you can do this before me, I'm happy; if youwill made this better than me, you're my god ;) [yeah, you're right that this comparion needs to be expanded!] mabdul 0=* 20:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Audio/Video Streaming Support

Is that NNTP-related? If not, it's probably an off-topic feature. Tedickey (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

It's at least as NNTP-related as "Automatic Par Support", "NZB Support" and "UnZip/UnRAR Support" if not more. The purpose of a Usenet client is to display Usenet content whether text or binary. A modern Usenet client should be able to display large binary content as fast as possible and preferably without requiring a multi-gigabyte download before the user can catch a first glimplse of the content. That's why this feature IMHO is very relevant --edbund (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

No Newswatcher?

I see Newswatcher is missing from the list of readers. It's a Mac OS one. For more info, see:

http://www.smfr.org/mtnw/

In fact a large number of other Mac newsreaders are also missing from the list. Here's one list and summary someone made up:

http://www.macorchard.com/usenet/

Stephen 114.72.204.193 (talk) 18:58, 6 November 2010 (UTC)