Jump to content

User talk:194.75.128.200

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 115.78.227.155 (talk) at 15:18, 25 November 2010 (Undid revision 398625365 by RashersTierney (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Attention:

This IP address, 194.75.128.200, is registered to HBOS and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact HBOS to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

October 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pgk (talkcontribs) 16:58, 4 October 2005.

January 2006

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --> -- GraemeL (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Canderson7 (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eyewitless

Hi there. The guideline relating to external links is at Wikipedia:External links. External links are not a link directory for anything related to the subject of the article but for sites which expand on or supplement the encyclopedic content of the article. A site which confesses to not being about Doctor Who isn't going to do that. Plenty of Who fans have websites and blogs (myself included); being produced a fan - even having occasionally content related to the series - doesn't mean a site supplements the article. Cheers. —Whouk (talk) 12:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]



Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Dionyseus. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Gimboid13 06:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking, as you did with User:Dionyseus. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo 08:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Gary Bollan

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Nigel (Talk) 12:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Dale Winton - Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Nigel (Talk) 12:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Kenny_Miller on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --james(talk) 13:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto concerning Lucky Luciano.[1]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --

Mantanmoreland 13:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to NTL

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to NTL. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bubba hotep 09:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Ashlee Simpson

Please note that only freely distributed images may be used on Wikipedia. Please see WP:FU for more information. Mithras6 21:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Fighter aircraft

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Fighter aircraft. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 67.190.201.215 13:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Walton-on-Thames. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Matthew 09:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Airbus UK F.C.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Airbus UK F.C.. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Arwel (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Birkenhead

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Birkenhead page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. JMcC 22:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.

February 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Chordiant page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bencherlite 15:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Countdown, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 13:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Countdown, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Water, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 12:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Water (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Water, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 12:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Belfast, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -Panser Born- (talk) 15:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Moortown, Leeds. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anas talk? 16:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, the one you made to Kesar, was neither helpful nor constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Jmlk17 09:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range is currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. We apologize for any inconvenience. -- {Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!}

· AndonicO Talk 14:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aiden McGeady - 8 June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -->--Vintagekits 12:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Aiden McGeady, you will be blocked from editing. --John 16:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Gordon Ramsay

Please do not add unreferenced controversial information to Wikipedia articles on living persons. Thank you. --Madchester 20:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Durvasa

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Durvasa page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Madchester 03:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Aiden McGeady, you will be blocked from editing. Barryob Vigeur de dessus 11:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Thanks for experimenting with the page Cuban Link on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Brianga 10:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Prisoner of war. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hut 8.5 12:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Nani (footballer), you will be blocked from editing. --> Lradrama 10:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Handbridge, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others.  DDStretch  (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions, which appear to be that of vandalism in concert with User:194.75.129.200 on Chester, where that user vandalizes the article, and you immediately revert it (as is the tactic done entirely by this ip address on a number of other articles) is also vandalism.  DDStretch  (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Adventures of Teddy Ruxpin, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel McBreen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite 14:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Terry Ball. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ionescuac(Talk) 13:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Andrew, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Schumi555 13:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Nash, you will be blocked from editing. Calliopejen1 13:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Homophobia, you will be blocked from editing. Henrymrx (talk) 11:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cellulitis, you will be blocked from editing. David Ruben Talk 23:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to November 28. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geoff Riley (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Indie Music

Indie Music is fucking shit, and there's so much of it about these days. It aint original, the singing is usually of a pathetically poor quality, and to top it off the content is not much to be admired as well. How dare you suggest otherwise. 91.108.249.217 (talk) 20:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Your recent edit to Girls Drink Free (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Robyn and Gandeleyn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Fordan (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi, the recent edit you made to Hungus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ALLSTAR echo 11:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Upton, Cheshire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  DDStretch  (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Ixfd64 (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dwain Chambers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prodego talk 15:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The recent edit you made to Rambo (film) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 15:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Inter City Firm. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO Hail! 19:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Caroline's a Victim/Birds. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Redford, Edinburgh, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Redford, Edinburgh was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-21T14:05:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The recent edit you made to Firrhill High School constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 14:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Halifax Explosion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dycedarg ж 20:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mackem, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mackem was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-16T09:23:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Uphall, West Lothian, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 14:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cookridge. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

Keith D (talk) 15:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ronnie O'Sullivan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ronnie O'Sullivan was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) deleting 14393 characters on 2008-05-02T12:59:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Mikey (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lee Evans (comedian) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to John Terry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jens Lehmann, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jens Lehmann was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-24T10:55:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sportacus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sportacus was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-30T17:18:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gloria Estefan. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Kww (talk) 11:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Environmental policy of the United States has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dadude3320 18:21, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chaos theory has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gail (talk) 14:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Chaos theory constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thanks. Gail (talk) 14:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Stevenson College, Edinburgh. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

Keith D (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Your edits to July 12

Dear 194.75.128.200,
Some of your edits on the page July 12 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

No Wikipedia page has been linked to.

If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 13:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Hibernian F.C.

The recent edit you made to Hibernian F.C. constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Robert Maudsley has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 15:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Windsor knot has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 15:50, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to TRC band (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jimmy Cricket has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Keilana|Parlez ici 13:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Chester, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. The history of vandalism and other inappropriate editing from this anon IP address justifies this immediate final warning. To avoid being penalised by a block, you could consider creating an account.  DDStretch  (talk) 12:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for adding spam links to articles despite warnings. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  Talk  13:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Jza84 |  Talk  13:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Howard Brown. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 08:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Howard Brown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Coffee joe (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Trumpet. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Moose. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Tombstone (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bitten (movie) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jayson (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to 1988

Dear 194.75.128.200,
Some of your edits on the page 1988 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The page you linked to is a Disambiguation page.

Please choose the individual that you mean from that page, and link to their Wikipedia page. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 12:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Football hooliganism has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 13:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Days of Thunder, you will be blocked from editing. Oda Mari (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Drug-Free Natural Salt Aerosol Therapy"

I have reverted your addition of a section at the articles Asthma, Tonsillitis, and Allergy containing this text:

Drug-Free Natural Salt Aerosol Therapy
Allergy & Asthma Centre is a new clinic in London (Wandsworth) that provides drug-free dry saline aerosol treatment for patients with different respiratory illnesses. This medication free treatment is new to the UK but it is well known in Canada and Eastern Europe. The principle of this unique method is that the natural microclimate of the salt mines is replicated with the help of a special nebulizer. Dry sodium chloride aerosol containing particles of 1-5um in size is produced by this special nebulizer and released into the treatment room. Particles density (0.5-9 mg/m3) varies with the type of the disease. Other factors are comfortable temperature- humidity regime, the hypobacterial and allergen-free air environment saturated with aeroions. The specificity of this method is the low concentration and gradual administration of dry sodium chloride aerosol. The salt particles are extremely fine in this microclimate and the agent does not irritate the respiratory tract, reaching even the smallest bronchia in the lungs.

The unsourced section was added to these articles without consideration of properly weighting coverage of this treatment, and in a manner that appears to advertise for a specific clinic. If you can provide reliable sources and studies concerning the efficacy of this treatment, I encourage you to post to the article talk pages to initiate further discussion. Thank you. Maralia (talk) 18:09, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Girls Aloud. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 09:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dennis Haskins has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 13:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Mark Fotheringham has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Camw (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page David Attenborough has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 08:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Synovial membrane has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Doulos Christos ♥ talk  13:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David N'Gog, you will be blocked from editing. --GedUK  21:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Woodcock, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Woodcock was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-02T13:25:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 15:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hollyoaks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 16:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Charlie Adam (footballer born 1985). Alansohn (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chough has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 14:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Damon Hill. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gareth Bale, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gareth Bale was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-14T11:01:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page George Tomlinson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Oldlaptop321 (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page David N'Gog has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 13:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. --GedUK  13:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Kevin Fertig. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ♥NiciVampireHeart17:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Mess Hall has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. James'ööders 09:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. ThemFromSpace 11:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page David N'Gog has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Drew Smith What I've done 10:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC) [reply]

June 2009

Your edits to August 29

Dear 194.75.128.200,
Some of your edits on the page August 29 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 09:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Cumbernauld has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Wake me 13:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jackie Chan, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --RobertGtalk 12:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ghostbusters (franchise), you will be blocked from editing. magnius (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jackie Chan. Alansohn (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Seven Arts Productions has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Wake me 13:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Trevor Francis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cowdenbeath. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lanark has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ipatrol (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Andy Hornby, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Martin451 (talk) 21:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to The Pogues. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. I don't care if you reverted yourself, the Hitler image is not funny Omarcheeseboro (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scrotum, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 14:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Equivalent narcotic depth

Thanks for trying to correct Equivalent narcotic depth, but it actually is END. Equivalent air depth (EAD) is a different concept. I'll tidy up and try to make the distinction clearer. --RexxS (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Gallagher. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Racchi, you will be blocked from editing.
Incidentally, it's spelt "gonorrhoea" in British English. Struway2 (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sarah Kennedy.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:20, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sheffield Wednesday F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 13:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jermaine Jenas. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Bungalow has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dire Straits has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Jusdafax 16:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Muammar al-Gaddafi appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talkcontribs 15:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Chopra, you will be blocked from editing. Cocytus [»talk«] 16:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Martyn Waghorn, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mpdelbuono (talk) 17:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Tartar sauce has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The thing that should not be 15:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bank of Scotland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A8UDI 13:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]


December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stefan Dennis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sheffield Wednesday F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

January 2010

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Adam Hildreth. Thank you. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 10:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Adam Hildreth. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. petiatil »speak 10:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petiatil (talkcontribs)

February 2010

Thank you for experimenting with the page Fame on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Collymore

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Stan Collymore, you will be blocked from editing. 86.147.184.127 (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Net Promoter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Jared Leto. Thank you. --Ibn (talk) 11:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to East Craigs United AFC, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wine Guy~Talk 10:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Bannockburn, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ALI nom nom 14:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Les Dennis. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Katieh5584 (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dizzee Rascal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GD 6041 (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Rotherham United F.C.

Could you explain how stating players' contracts expire on 30 June and certain players join on 1 July on Rotherham United F.C. is "overcomplicated" and "factually inaccurate"? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page World economy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 17:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Rafael van der Vaart. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Timmy Mallett, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ♦ Jongleur100 talk 13:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Doug McCaig has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -download ׀ sign! 14:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sparkler, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sparkler was changed by 194.75.128.200 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-11-05T19:30:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]