User talk:Wangond

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Indian Ocean. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you think something is wrong - go the talk page and discuss there first Satu Suro 08:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Wangond! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Them From Space 08:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Misunderstanding

I actually wrote (look above) as part of my warning - If you think something is wrong - go the talk page and discuss there first SatuSuro 4:18 pm, Today (UTC+8) Satu Suro 09:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok.--Wangond (talk) 09:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

India After Gandhi

gbooks is wrong when it says the book has only 300 pages. The 2008 paperback edition is over 900 pages. Also before redirecting articles like "Madrasi", don't decide unilaterally. For big changes like that it is better to begin a discussion and ask for opinion of others. (i have added three more sources for it being considered a "slur" now).--Sodabottle (talk) 15:26, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Enthiran. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I warn you not to play warning games with me. --Wangond (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than making statements in edit comments or making vague threats, please use a Dispute resolution process. Thanks Fæ (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will book you for editwarring and ignoring discussion progress at talk pages and ignoring edit summaries. --Wangond (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel you have a case then by all means go ahead and seek advice (presumably that's what you mean by "book you"). I have already pointed out that removing a maintenance template which points to an ongoing dispute is clearly against the guidelines and putting it back is neither edit warring or ignoring discussions. Fæ (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have not responded to my arguments. And now you're putting the damn template back without any clear answer or point. And even more worse, you don't bother about other articles in this case. You just come here and disrupt a Tamil article. All Indian movie articles would have no box office section anymore, if you're point would be accepted. There will be no lists of Box offices for Indian movies. If you want to go to dispute resolution, I'm ready to face the whole consequences, but I'm not sure, whether this will be the case for other users, too. This will be a ground-breaking dispute resolution process. I'm seriously interested in the outcome. So open a dispute resolution process, since you are the only one here, who sees a dispute here. I will revert your template until you open the process, since this is the only way you can proof your good faith in this case.--Wangond (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not required for contributors to prove their good faith, the guideline is for it to be assumed, see WP:AGF. I have addressed your points on the article talk page and here. Your behaviour of repeatedly deleting a maintenance template does not meet the guidelines of BOLD. Fæ (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at how you misuse these guidelines for disruptive editing, I seriously doubt you should talk about it!--Wangond (talk) 15:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Enthiran. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fæ (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported for editwarring.--Wangond (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Your recent edit to the page Rajnikanth appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Signed | Aoghac2z | 00:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ponniyin Selvan (2012 film)

The article Ponniyin Selvan (2012 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NFF (the notability guideline for future films), articles on films may not be created until principal filming has begun, and then only when the production itself has received significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ponniyin Selvan (2012 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ponniyin Selvan (2012 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:30, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Let me just clarify what happened: I prodded the article first as an uncontroversial deletion. However, after doing that, I saw that the article had recently been deleted under the AfD process. As such, I removed the prod and requested the article be speedily deleted. Please note that this article can not exist until principal filming has begun. Note that being "confirmed" essentially means nothing in the movie industry--numerous films are confirmed, budgeted, and cast, but then canceled prior to filming. This is why WP:NFF explicitly states that we may not have articles on films until such time as principal filming has started, and then only when the production itself has received multiple sources of significant coverage. Otherwise, we wait until the film is much closer to completion for an article. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Otherwise, please do not recreate this article until it meets our notability guidelines. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know the filming part. --Wangond (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rice and curry

Hi Wangond, do you have any sources calling rice and curry as "National dish" of south India? Salih (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Salih, the national part doesn´t need sources. It´s an integral part of the English language. Don´t be country-centric, as this obviously doesn´t apply here, since South India doesn´t form a nation. Be bold.--Wangond (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have to be precise here, calling something a "national dish" is exaggerating, not being bold.--Sodabottle (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you forming an allice against me? It doesn´t say Indias national dish. It precisely says AP,KN,KL,TN.--Wangond (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

want to call it national dish of india instead?--Wangond (talk) 18:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC) http://books.google.com/books?id=LtQqAAAAMAAJ&q=national+dish+of+kerala&dq=national+dish+of+kerala&hl=en&ei=otmMTYGsKorg4gaziPGrCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAg[reply]