This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Help me out here. I have been trying to get some sort of structure into this affair. As I pointed out elsewhere I do not have any preferences regarding the use of one language or the other. All I am looking for is to have one or the other used consistently within this project. As there are currently 32 pages in the Category:U-boat flotillas, and only three (four if you count the list) of them use English titles, there seems to be a strong preferences of German language titles. I would like to discuss that with the wider scope in mind, as I would hate to have this discussion on each of the other 31 articles in the category.
I hadn’t realized it was so one-sided. But the guidelines are clear enough; we should use an English-language format unless there is a pressing reason not to. In this case the German title equates merely to 1st U-Boat Flotilla, so it isn’t as if the name has any significance in the original. So my preference would be to move them all to an English format.
But your point about 30-odd separate discussions is well taken; I’ve raised the issue here to see if there is any objection to doing that. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]