User talk:JahSun

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from RichardWeiss! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome SqueakBox 17:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SqueakBox 17:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Water Charity Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Water Charity Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation.Template:Z134 --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Omnientheism for E2?

There is another website, Everything2, where your contributions on omnientheism would be most welcome. If you don't mind it I could have what you've done posted there. Or you could join and do so. Blessings!! DeistCosmos (talk) 04:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to port what is up now over there. In fact, do it soon... as the fate of that page is uncertain here. I will probably come along and join when I have time :). JahSun (talk) 14:29, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JahSun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JahSun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JahSun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cybercobra (talk) 06:49, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may find the following useful for going about demonstrating your notability: --Cybercobra (talk) 07:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS, WP:GNG, Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hello, JahSun. You have new messages at Cybercobra's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You should never write a wikipedia article about yourself. Its a good rule of thumb.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On removing Afd tags

JahSun, please do not remove Afd tags on articles - as you did here [1]. It is disruptive. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are engaged in wikihounding. This is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Harassment. I think you should remove yourself from any of the articles I am involved with and let other editors deal with whatever may or may not be wrong with them. Editing on multiple articles from the same individual is considering hounding. You have begun to make my experience here unpleasant.

The fact that you last call for deletion of an article of mine was rejected shows that you are not being impartial here. Go find something else to do. JahSun (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note Please read Wikipedia policy above. Do NOT remove Afd tags. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Water Charity

Some friendly advice about your article - if you can find independent, reliable sources that support the information in your article, it will meet the Wikipedia guidelines in WP:NCORP for non-commercial organisations. Unfortunately because the name of your charity is not distinctive enough to stand out in an internet search, I wouldn't know myself where to find this verification. If you can find the verification I would happily support keeping the article. Best of luck! Sionk (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are hundreds of sources. I am a busy man and can not spend time defending this article. If the clear evidence of helping a million human beings is not enough to warrant an article, then I can't be bothered. The fact that major news organizations have written articles about us, interviewed our executives on TV etc. is incontestable. The person who called for this deletion is someone who has taken it upon themselves to follow me around wikipedia and personally challenge everything I have done here. I can not be bothered to devote as much energy into going tit-for tat with individuals who seem to have nothing better to do than to sit and edit wikipedia all day every day.... I am a CEO after all. JahSun (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not have time to create real articles, then please continue to devote your time as CEO. Your actions are unproductive, as you are neither working with others, nor educating yourself about Wikipedia policy. Please see the many links above. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist on hounding me I will take this to the relevant authorities. Harassment is not productive.JahSun (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do!!! Your disruptive actions need to be brought to light. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without the many voluntary editors of Wikipedia this free popular online knowledge resource wouldn't exist. I'm sure you appreciate that, as you are running a charity yourself. I would happily support keeping the 'Water Charity' article if there was more than one independent reliable source for the information. It's up to you to add a few of the 'hundreds' that exist. Sionk (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sionk, you seem like a reasonable sort. It may seem that I was overly verbose in my calling out of the harassment of the editors in question, but you are probably only privy to a fraction of the abuse they subjected me to. They are adept at deleting their most agregious abuses. It seems to me that when people follow you around and hound you, it needs to be exposed. You would think that my proving the WP:NONPROFIT status as I had early on, it would be obvious as it was to you that the case was closed... but instead I had 4 editors constantly telling me that I was wrong and they were right, that my sources were not reliable, and no matter what I did... even to the point of following the advice of Melanie directly, it was never good enough for them. Without you coming onto the thread and setting the record straight, they would still be calling out inappropriate policies and attacking me... As it stands, Cybercobra has had one of his friends ban me for simply revealing his behavior. I could care less tbh. The fact remains that he has been called to account numerous times in one ANI after another. He has been accused of sockpuppetry enough that a formal investigation should be undertaken.

If I wouldn't have spent this time arguing with them, they would have deleted the article already. I hope you understand that even if my behavior wasn't exactly stellar in this... it was the only thing i could actually do when being ganged upon by a clear clique of editors who took an unnatural interest in me personally. JahSun (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Cybercobra & User:Ism schism, you have been blocked for making personal attacks and harassing other editors. —Ruud 13:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

JahSun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:JahSun recognizes that personal attacks are uncalled for even when he feels he is being harassed.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=User:JahSun recognizes that personal attacks are uncalled for even when he feels he is being harassed. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=User:JahSun recognizes that personal attacks are uncalled for even when he feels he is being harassed. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=User:JahSun recognizes that personal attacks are uncalled for even when he feels he is being harassed. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}