User talk:Morgan Katarn

Hello, Morgan Katarn, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bencherlite ^Talk 09:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

But why ask me on just your third edit? Have we met before, perhaps when you've edited using another name? Bencherlite ^Talk 09:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No... I just edited the Wikipedia with my IP. Morgan Katarn (talk) 10:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sudo Ghost 13:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Programming

Yes, I worked on Mysteries of the Sith and an early version of what eventually became Obi Wan. I don't have any unreleased content sitting around, though. I get asked that a lot. Sorry. - Richfife (talk)

Yes. Outlaws (and Handful of Missions.) - Richfife (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. That list is complete. I left LucasArts in 2000. - Richfife (talk) 14:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know who Morgan Katarn is. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not really a Star Wars fan. Add Star Wars to this list. - Richfife (talk) 14:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Morgan Katarn, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 17:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Morgan Katarn. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 17:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sarah (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Morgan Katarn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey Review me! 18:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Morgan Katarn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Help Desk talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Morgan Katarn. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Help Desk talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Morgan Katarn. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Ryan Vesey Review me! 20:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Removing references

To remove a reference, you cannot simply remove the {{reflist}} template. You have to actually remove the reference in the <ref>...</ref> tags. Hope that helps, Happy editing! --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 18:38, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, well I already added a new section into your talk page. Morgan Katarn (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"This user has made 1 edit"

Your user page says "This user has made 1 edit". Isn't it a bit outdated? From your contributions page, I count that you have made over 100 edits now. JIP | Talk 14:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is only a joke. Morgan Katarn (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK then. It wasn't very obvious from your user page. JIP | Talk 14:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already changed it to an arrogant statement. Morgan Katarn (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin

Hi! Are you an admin on the English Wikipedia? Morgan Katarn (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Morgan. I am not an admin. May I ask, what made you ask me?:)Halbared (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh I see you were after an admin as a mentor, well good luck with your search and quest to be an admin.:)Halbared (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting my edit to this article. There is no main protagonist in the first Episode of Star Wars. Morgan Katarn (talk) 10:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed vandal warning, and proposed what should be acceptable on Qui-Gon Jinn. Qui-Gon is considered to be the primary protagonist of that particular episode, Anakin and Obi-Wan are secondary. With Love ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Where is the proof for that? Morgan Katarn (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were right there is no protagonist per say for Episode I per http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/2012/02/09/star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace-3d-review/. Rewrote the entry to be more encyclopaedic. With Love ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Thanks! Morgan Katarn (talk) 10:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You strike me as a big Star Wars fan :-D I am also if you would like to collaborate on some articles. Star Wars: The Old Republic forever <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀}

Well, the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic series are far better. Morgan Katarn (talk) 10:53, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle Difficulties

I have added you to my Huggle whitelist so it stops identifying your edits as vandalism :-) Soooo sorry for the difficulties <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 21:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem ;) -- Morgan Katarn (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the quality of your editing

I know you must have realized this to some extent, because you make a lot of edits arguing with people about them reverting you, but please take a step back and consider how well you are contributing to Wikipedia right now. Please take some time to review the histories of articles you have edited recently. The vast majority of your edits are quickly reverted as unconstructive. From this edit and your subsequent edit warring over it I am also concerned you might not have sufficient grammatical knowledge to be making signficant edits to articles. Regardless, please take more time to evaluate why people are reverting your edits before getting into an edit war. Part of Wikipedia policy is that anyone can edit what you write, and you do not have the right to preserve poor quality edits simply because you made them.

As another example to consider, there are your edits at the Kyle Katarn article. You kept changing the lead to say Kyle "is" portrayed by Jason court. Your edit was extremely poorly worded and misleading: "Is" is present tense. Jason Court no longer plays Katarn in anything. In fact, Katarn was played by other voice actors in the other games, including more recent ones, so Court wasn't even the last Katarn any more than Sean Connery "is" James Bond. Some guy (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the quality of your editing

You will probably find when making large numbers of uncited edits to articles that a proportion of them are likely to be reverted by other users. You may like to consider accepting this with good grace rather than always insisting your version is correct. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just using the sources like other editors on the Wikipedia. There are users who don't know anything about these articles and they continue reverting and then I'm called editwarrior. No, they are these guys who are causing editwars. Master Katarn (talk) 13:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply, apart from confirming your stubbornness which is creating disharmony with other editors, shows your lack of grammatical knowledge which is one of the problems with many of your edits. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You only have to need to correct the gramatical errors, that's all. But please stop reverting all of my edits. There were very useful edits on articles. Master Katarn (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not reverting all your edits. I reverted edits to three articles which were ungrammatical, unnecessary and in one case contradicted by the given reference. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Understood but I already told you several times that I live here in Austria where I speak German and I'm contributing to the English Wikipedia because the German admins are full of crap. They ban users without any warnings and also the users there are slow. The English Wikipedia is much better and justified. And with the reverts, I mainly mean that MadMan guy. Master Katarn (talk) 13:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My reversions, like Mean as custard's, are mainly due to your self-admitted lack of knowledge of the grammatical conventions of the English language. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 21:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henriettenplatz

The article Henriettenplatz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A street with some fast food outlets on it is very unlikely to be notable even if it is popular with students. The school itself might well be notable. It has an article in the German Wikipedia.

I think it is best to delete this article about the street. I think it would be OK to start a separate article about the school translated from the German article. I don't speak German so I can't be much help with this.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Town

There is no point in changing the grammar if the grammar you change it to is wrong. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, please stop making that pointless incorrect change Morgan Katarn. Freikorp (talk) 06:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Dwayne Johnson

I've reverted the edit you made to Dwayne Johnson as it contradicted the citation provided for Johnson's billed height. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 14:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation 3

Please don't continue trying to correct the grammar in articles. Your knowledge of the English language is insufficient and you are changing good grammar to bad grammar. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Latest edits

Hi there.

I've just reverted three of your edits.

The first two are grammatically poor - despite your protestaions that they are correct - and the third is unsourced, probably non-notable, and you linked to an entirely unconnected article.

Please take more care over your edits - especially as I'm not the only editor to point this out to you - thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012 (2)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tulln an der Donau, you may be blocked from editing. - If you continue to make edits like that, when you had already been warned that it was incorrect, it is liable to be regarded as disruptive editing and likely to get you blocked. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, then try your best and block me you retard! I haven't vandalized pages on the Wikipedia! Just your stupidility vandalizes the Wikipedia! Now please stop reverting. Master Katarn (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth is a "Romanic club"? . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Romanic club is a club where new citizens make parties and so on. It's called Romanic club because the alter of Comagena is Romanic. Master Katarn (talk) 13:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. WaggersTALK 13:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He started attacking me with his threat that I would be blocked from editing the Wikipedia although I've done nothing! I'm just editing phrases in several articles. Master Katarn (talk) 13:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bencherlite ^Talk 14:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned before and seem not to have heeded the advice. Perhaps 24 hours not editing will give you time to reflect and to read the rules of the English Wikipedia about edit warring. Bencherlite ^Talk 14:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but I'm not the only one who was edit warring. Well, can you please make an exception and unblock me? I will stop edit warring at once. I will discuss reverts out with those users in future. 24 hours are too long. I have to make more edits on the Wikipedia. Master Katarn (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]