Jump to content

Higgs boson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 194.54.31.24 (talk) at 08:24, 4 July 2012 (→Experimental search). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"God particle" redirects here. For the book, see The God Particle (book).
Higgs boson
One possible signature of a Higgs boson from a simulated proton-proton collision. It decays almost immediately into two jets of hadrons and two electrons, visible as lines.
CompositionElementary particle
StatisticsBosonic
StatusTentatively confirmed - a particle "consistent with" the Higgs Boson has been formally discovered, but as of July 2012, scientists are being cautious as to whether it is formally identified as being the Higgs Boson.[1]
SymbolH0
TheorizedF. Englert, R. Brout, P. Higgs, G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble (1964)
Discovered4th July 2012
Types1, according to the Standard Model;
Mass125.3±0.6 GeV/c2[2]
Electric charge0
Spin0

The Higgs boson is an elementary particle in the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics. It belongs to a class of particles known as bosons, characterized by an integer value of their spin quantum number. The Higgs field is a quantum field that fills all of space. Fundamental particles (or elementary particles) such as quarks and electrons acquire mass through the Higgs mechanism. The Higgs boson is the quantum of the Higgs field, just as the photon is the quantum of the electromagnetic field. The Higgs boson has a large mass, however, which is why a large accelerator is needed to study it.

The existence of the Higgs boson is predicted by the Standard Model to explain how spontaneous breaking of electroweak symmetry (the Higgs mechanism) takes place in nature, which in turn explains why other elementary particles have mass.[Note 1] Its discovery has validated the Standard Model as essentially correct, and was the final elementary particle predicted by the Standard Model to be observed in particle physics experiments.[3] The Standard Model completely fixes the properties of the Higgs boson, except for its mass. It is expected to have no spin and no electric or color charge, and it interacts with other particles through the weak interaction and Yukawa-type interactions between the various fermions and the Higgs field. Alternative sources of the Higgs mechanism that do not need the Higgs boson are also possible and would be considered if the existence of the Higgs boson were ruled out. They are known as Higgsless models.

Experiments to determine whether the Higgs boson exists are currently being performed using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, and were performed at Fermilab's Tevatron until its closure in late 2011. Mathematical consistency of the Standard Model requires that any mechanism capable of generating the masses of elementary particles become visible at energies above 1.4 TeV;[4] therefore, the LHC (designed to collide two 7-TeV proton beams) is expected to be able to answer the question of whether or not the Higgs boson actually exists.[5] In December 2011, Fabiola Gianotti and Guido Tonelli, who were then spokespersons of the two main experiments at the LHC (ATLAS and CMS) both reported independently that their data hints at a possibility the Higgs may exist with a mass around 125 GeV/c2 (about 133 proton masses, on the order of 10−25 kg). They also reported that the original range under investigation has been narrowed down considerably and that a mass outside approximately 115–130 GeV/c2 is almost ruled out.[6] It was anticipated that the LHC would provide sufficient data by the end of 2012 for a definite answer.[2][7][8][9]

Around 28 June 2012 rumors began to spread in the media that an announcement was anticipated, but it was unclear whether this would be a stronger signal, or a formal discovery.[10] On 4 July 2012, Fabiola Gianotti and Joseph Incandela, current spokespersons for the ATLAS and CMS experiments, and chief executive of the Science and technology Facilities Council John Womersley, presented the latest results on the Higgs from the LHC.[11] They confirmed the "five sigma" level of evidence needed to show a formal discovery of a particle which was "consistent with the Higgs boson", acknowledging that further work would be needed to conclude that it had indeed all theoretically predicted properties of the Higgs boson.[12][13]

History

  

The six authors of the 1964 PRL papers, who received the 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize for their work. From left to right: Kibble, Guralnik, Hagen, Englert, Brout. Right: Higgs.

See also: 1964 PRL symmetry breaking papers and Higgs mechanism

Particle physicists believe matter to be made from fundamental particles whose interactions are mediated by exchange particles known as force carriers. At the start of the 1960s a number of these particles had been discovered or proposed, along with theories suggesting how they relate to each other. However these theories were known to be incomplete. One omission was that they could not explain the origins of mass as a property of matter. Goldstone's theorem, relating to continuous symmetries within some theories, also appeared to rule out many obvious solutions. [14]

The Higgs mechanism is a process by which vector bosons can get rest mass without explicitly breaking gauge invariance. The proposal for such a spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism was originally suggested in 1962 by Philip Warren Anderson[15] and developed into a full relativistic model in 1964 independently and almost simultaneously by three groups of physicists: by François Englert and Robert Brout;[16] by Peter Higgs;[17] and by Gerald Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and Tom Kibble (GHK).[18] Properties of the model were further considered by Guralnik in 1965[19] and by Higgs in 1966.[20] The papers showed that when a gauge theory is combined with an additional field which spontaneously breaks the symmetry group, the gauge bosons can consistently acquire a finite mass. In 1967, Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam were the first to apply the Higgs mechanism to the breaking of the electroweak symmetry, and showed how a Higgs mechanism could be incorporated into Sheldon Glashow's electroweak theory,[21][22][23] in what became the Standard Model of particle physics.

Template:Wikinewshas The three papers written in 1964 were each recognized as milestone papers during Physical Review Letters's 50th anniversary celebration.[24] Their six authors were also awarded the 2010 J. J. Sakurai Prize for Theoretical Particle Physics for this work.[25] (A dispute also arose the same year; in the event of a Nobel Prize up to 3 scientists would be eligible, with 6 authors credited for the papers.[26] ) Two of the three PRL papers (by Higgs and by GHK) contained equations for the hypothetical field that would eventually become known as the Higgs field and its hypothetical quantum, the Higgs boson. Higgs' subsequent 1966 paper showed the decay mechanism of the boson; only a massive boson can decay and the decays can prove the mechanism.

In the paper by Higgs the boson is massive, and in a closing sentence Higgs writes that "an essential feature" of the theory "is the prediction of incomplete multiplets of scalar and vector bosons". In the paper by GHK the boson is massless and decoupled from the massive states. In reviews dated 2009 and 2011, Guralnik states that in the GHK model the boson is massless only in a lowest-order approximation, but it is not subject to any constraint and acquires mass at higher orders, and adds that the GHK paper was the only one to show that there are no massless Nambu-Goldstone bosons in the model and to give a complete analysis of the general Higgs mechanism.[27][28]

In addition to explaining how mass is acquired by vector bosons, the Higgs mechanism also predicts the ratio between the W boson and Z boson masses as well as their couplings with each other and with the Standard Model quarks and leptons. Many of these predictions have subsequently been verified by precise measurements performed at the LEP and the SLC colliders, thus overwhelmingly confirming that some kind of Higgs mechanism does take place in nature,[29] but the exact manner by which it happens is not yet proven. The results of searching for the Higgs boson are expected to provide evidence about how this is realized in nature.

Theoretical properties

Main article: Higgs mechanism
Summary of interactions between particles described by the Standard Model.
A one-loop Feynman diagram of the first-order correction to the Higgs mass. The Higgs boson couples strongly to the top quark so it may, if heavy enough, decay into top–anti-top quark pairs.

The Standard Model predicts the existence of a field (called the Higgs field) which has a non-zero amplitude in its ground state; i.e. a non-zero vacuum expectation value. The existence of this non-zero vacuum expectation spontaneously breaks electroweak gauge symmetry which in turn gives rise to the Higgs mechanism. It is the simplest process capable of giving mass to the gauge bosons while remaining compatible with gauge theories.[citation needed] The field can be pictured as a pool of molasses that "sticks" to the otherwise massless fundamental particles that travel through the field, converting them into particles with mass that form (for example) the components of atoms. Its quantum would be a scalar boson, known as the Higgs boson.[citation needed]

In the Standard Model, the Higgs field consists of two neutral and two charged component fields. Both of the charged components and one of the neutral fields are Goldstone bosons, which act as the longitudinal third-polarization components of the massive W+, W–, and Z bosons.[citation needed] The quantum of the remaining neutral component corresponds to (and is theoretically realized as) the massive Higgs boson. Since the Higgs field is a scalar field, the Higgs boson has no spin. The Higgs boson is also its own antiparticle and is CP-even, and has zero electric and color charge.[citation needed]

The Standard Model does not predict the mass of the Higgs boson.[citation needed] If that mass is between 115 and 180 GeV/c2, then the Standard Model can be valid at energy scales all the way up to the Planck scale (1016 TeV).[citation needed] Many theorists expect new physics beyond the Standard Model to emerge at the TeV-scale, based on unsatisfactory properties of the Standard Model.[citation needed] The highest possible mass scale allowed for the Higgs boson (or some other electroweak symmetry breaking mechanism) is 1.4 TeV; beyond this point, the Standard Model becomes inconsistent without such a mechanism, because unitarity is violated in certain scattering processes.[citation needed]

In theory the mass of the Higgs boson can be estimated indirectly. In the Standard Model, the Higgs boson has a number of indirect effects; most notably, Higgs loops result in tiny corrections to masses of W and Z bosons. Precision measurements of electroweak parameters, such as the Fermi constant and masses of W/Z bosons, can be used to constrain the mass of the Higgs. As of July 2011, the precision electroweak measurements tell us that the mass of the Higgs boson is lower than about 161 GeV/c2 at 95% confidence level (CL). This upper bound increases to 185 GeV/c2 when including the LEP-2 direct search lower bound of 114.4 GeV/c2.[29] These indirect constraints rely on the assumption that the Standard Model is correct. It may still be possible to discover a Higgs boson above 185 GeV/c2 if it is accompanied by other particles beyond those predicted by the Standard Model.[citation needed]

The minimal Standard Model as described above contains only one complex isospin Higgs doublet, however, it also is possible to have an extended Higgs sector with additional doublets or triplets. The non-minimal Higgs sector favored by theory are the two-Higgs-doublet models (2HDM), which predict the existence of a quintet of scalar particles: two CP-even neutral Higgs bosons h0 and H0, a CP-odd neutral Higgs boson A0, and two charged Higgs particles H±. The key method to distinguish different variations of the 2HDM models and the minimal SM involves their coupling and the branching ratios of the Higgs decays. The so called Type-I model has one higgs doublet coupling to up and down quarks, while the second doublet does not couple to quarks. This model has two interesting limits, in which the lightest higgs doesn't couple to either fermions (fermiophobic) or gauge bosons (gauge-phobic). In the 2HDM of Type-II, one Higgs doublet only couples to up-type quarks, while the other only couples to down-type quarks.

Many extensions to the Standard Model, including supersymmetry (SUSY), often contain an extended Higgs sector. Many supersymmetric models predict that the lightest Higgs boson will have a mass only slightly above the current experimental limits, at around 120 GeV/c2 or less.[citation needed] The heavily researched Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) belongs to the class of models with a Type-II two-Higgs-doublet sector and could be ruled out by the observation of a higgs belonging to a Type-I 2HDM.

Alternative mechanisms for electroweak symmetry breaking

Main article: Higgsless model

In the years since the Higgs field and boson were proposed, several alternative models have been proposed by which the Higgs mechanism might be realized. The Higgs boson exists in some but not all theories. For example, it exists in the Standard Model and extensions such as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model yet is not expected to exist in alternative models such as Technicolor. Models which do not include a Higgs field or a Higgs boson are known as Higgsless models. In these models, strongly interacting dynamics rather than an additional (Higgs) field produce the non-zero vacuum expectation value that breaks electroweak symmetry. A partial list of these alternative mechanisms are:

A goal of the LHC and Tevatron experiments is to distinguish between these models and determine if the Higgs boson exists or not.

Status as of March 2011.[citation needed] Colored sections have been ruled out to the stated confidence intervals either by indirect measurements and LEP experiments (green) or by Tevatron experiments (orange).
  
Feynman diagrams showing two ways the Higgs boson might be produced at the LHC. Left: two gluons convert to top/anti-top quark pairs, which combine. Right: two quarks emit W or Z bosons, which combine.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Large Hadron Collider.

As of July 202, the Higgs boson has been tentatively confirmed experimentally, despite large efforts invested in accelerator experiments at CERN and Fermilab, and media reports of possible evidence.[34][35][36]

Like other massive particles (e.g. the top quark and W and Z bosons), Higgs bosons created in particle accelerators decay long before they reach any of the detectors. However, the Standard Model precisely predicts the possible modes of decay and their probabilities. This allows events in which a Higgs was created to be identified by examining the decay products.

Prior to the year 2000, the data gathered at the Large Electron–Positron Collider (LEP) at CERN allowed an experimental lower bound to be set for the mass of the Standard Model Higgs boson of 114.4 GeV/c2 at the 95% confidence level (CL). The same experiment has produced a small number of events that could be interpreted as resulting from Higgs bosons with a mass just above this cut off — around 115 GeV — but the number of events was insufficient to draw definite conclusions.[37] The LEP was shut down in 2000 due to construction of its successor, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).

Full operation at the LHC was delayed for 14 months from its initial successful tests on 10 September 2008, until mid-November 2009,[38][39] following a magnet quench event 9 days after its inaugural tests that damaged over 50 superconducting magnets and contaminated the vacuum system.[40] The quench was traced to a faulty electrical connection and repairs took several months;[41][42] electrical fault detection and rapid quench-handling systems were also upgraded.

At the Fermilab Tevatron, there were also ongoing experiments searching for the Higgs boson. As of July 2010, combined data from CDF and DØ experiments at the Tevatron were sufficient to exclude the Higgs boson in the range 158-175 GeV/c2 at 95% CL.[43][44] Preliminary results as of July 2011 extended the excluded region to the range 156-177 GeV/c2 at 95% CL.[45]

Data collection and analysis in search of Higgs intensified from 30 March 2010 when the LHC began operating at 3.5 TeV.[46] Preliminary results from the ATLAS and CMS experiments at the LHC as of July 2011 exclude a Standard Model Higgs boson in the mass range 155-190 GeV/c2[47] and 149-206 GeV/c2,[48] respectively, at 95% CL. All of the above confidence intervals were derived using the CLs method.

As of December 2011 the search has narrowed to the approximate region 115–130 GeV with a specific focus around 125 GeV where both the ATLAS and CMS experiments independently report an excess of events,[2][8] meaning that a higher than expected number of particle patterns compatible with the decay of a Higgs boson were detected in this energy range. The data is not yet sufficient to show whether or not these excesses are due to background fluctuations (i.e. random chance or other causes), and its statistical significance is not large enough to draw conclusions yet or even formally to count as an "observation", but the fact that the two independent experiments have shown excesses at around the same mass has led to considerable excitement in the particle physics community.[49]

On 22 December 2011, the DØ Collaboration also reported limitations on the Higgs boson within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, an extension to the Standard Model. Proton-antiproton (pp) collisions with a centre-of-mass energy of 1.96 TeV had allowed them to set an upper limit for Higgs boson production within MSSM ranging from 90 to 300 GeV, and excluding tanβ > 20–30 for masses of the Higgs boson below 180 GeV (tanβ is the ratio of the two Higgs doublet vacuum expectation values).[50]

On February 7, the ATLAS and CMS experiments updated their results. After further analysis, their initial December results were mostly confirmed with the same statistical significance, indicating that the Standard Model Higgs boson, if it exists, is most likely to have a mass constrained to the range 116-131 GeV by the ATLAS experiment, and 115-127 GeV by CMS.[51][52][53]

On 7 March 2012, the DØ and CDF Collaborations announced that, after analyzing the full data set from the Tevatron accelerator, they found excesses in their data that might be interpreted as coming from a Higgs boson with a mass in the region of 115 to 135 GeV/c2. The significance of the excesses is quantified as 2.2 standard deviations, not enough to rule out that they are due to a statistical fluctuation. This new result also extends the range of Higgs-mass values excluded by the Tevatron experiments at 95% CL, which becomes 147-179 GeV/c2.[54][55]

On 2 July 2012, the ATLAS collaboration published additional analyzes of their 2011 data, excluding boson mass ranges of 111.4 GeV to 116.6 GeV, 119.4 GeV to 122.1 GeV, and 129.2 GeV to 541 GeV. They observed an excess of events corresponding to the Higgs boson mass hypotheses around 126 GeV with a local significance of 2.9 sigma.[56]

On 2 July 2012, the DØ and CDF Collaborations announced further analysis that increased their confidence. The significance of the excesses at energies between 115-140 GeV is now quantified as 2.9 standard deviations, corresponding to a 1 in 550 probability of being due to a statistical fluctuation. However, this still fell short of the 5 sigma confidence, therefore the results of the LHC experiments are necessary to establish a discovery. They exclude Higgs mass ranges at 100–103 and 147–180 GeV.[57][58]

It is expected that the LHC will provide sufficient data to either exclude or confirm the existence of the Standard Model Higgs boson by the end of 2012, when their new 2012 collision data (at energies of 8 TeV) is examined [59] or earlier, given the great expectations currently surrounding the announcement slated for July 4, 2012.[60]

Timeline of experimental evidence

All results refer to the Standard Model Higgs boson, unless otherwise stated.
  • 2000–2004 – using data collected before 2000, in 2003–2004 Large Electron–Positron Collider experiments published papers which set a lower bound for the Higgs boson of 114.4 GeV/c2 at the 95% confidence level (CL), with a small number of events around 115 GeV.[37]
  • July 2010 – data from CDF (Fermilab) and DØ (Tevatron) experiments exclude the Higgs boson in the range 158–175 GeV/c2 at 95% CL.[43][44]
  • 24 April 2011 – media reports 'rumors' of a find;[61] these were debunked by May 2011.[62] They had not been a hoax, but were based on unofficial, unreviewed results.[63]
  • 24 July 2011 – the LHC reported possible signs of the particle, the ATLAS Note concluding: "In the low mass range (c. 120–140 GeV) an excess of events with a significance of approximately 2.8 sigma above the background expectation is observed" and the BBC reporting that "interesting particle events at a mass of between 140 and 145 GeV" were found.[64][65] These findings were repeated shortly thereafter by researchers at the Tevatron with a spokesman stating that: "There are some intriguing things going on around a mass of 140GeV."[64] On 22 August 2011 it was reported that these anomalous results had become insignificant on the inclusion of more data from ATLAS and CMS and that the non-existence of the particle had been confirmed by LHC collisions to 95% certainty between 145–466 GeV (except for a few small islands around 250 GeV).[66]
  • 23–24 July 2011 – Preliminary LHC results exclude the ranges 155–190 GeV/c2 (ATLAS)[47] and 149–206 GeV/c2 (CMS)[48] at 95% CL.
  • 27 July 2011 – preliminary CDF/DØ results extend the excluded range to 156–177 GeV/c2 at 95% CL.[45]
  • 18 November 2011 – a combined analysis of ATLAS and CMS data further narrowed the window for the allowed values of the Higgs boson mass to 114–141 GeV.[67]
  • 13 December 2011 – experimental results were announced from the ATLAS and CMS experiments, indicating that if the Higgs boson exists, its mass is limited to the range 116–130 GeV (ATLAS) or 115–127 GeV (CMS), with other masses excluded at 95% CL. Observed excesses of events at around 124 GeV (CMS) and 125–126 GeV (ATLAS) are consistent with the presence of a Higgs boson signal, but also consistent with fluctuations in the background. The global statistical significances of the excesses are 1.9 sigma (CMS) and 2.6 sigma (ATLAS) after correction for the look elsewhere effect.[2][8] As of 13 December 2011, a combined result is not yet available.
  • 22 December 2011 – the DØ Collaboration also sets limits on Higgs boson masses within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (an extension of the Standard Model), with an upper limit for production ranging from 90 to 300 GeV, and excluding tanβ>20–30 for Higgs boson masses below 180 GeV at 95% CL.[50]
  • 7 February 2012 – updating the December results, the ATLAS and CMS experiments constrain the Standard Model Higgs boson, if it exists, to the range 116-131 GeV and 115-127 GeV, respectively, with the same statistical significance as before.[51][52][53]
  • 7 March 2012 – the DØ and CDF Collaborations announced that they found excesses that might be interpreted as coming from a Higgs boson with a mass in the region of 115 to 135 GeV/c2 in the full sample of data from Tevatron. The significance of the excesses is quantified as 2.2 standard deviations, corresponding to a 1 in 250 probability of being due to a statistical fluctuation. This is a lower significance, but consistent with and independent of the ATLAS and CMS data at the LHC.[68][69]
  • 22 June, 2012 – CERN announced they would hold a press conference on the topic on 4 July, 2012.[70]
  • 2 July 2012 – the ATLAS collaboration further analyzed their 2011 data, excluding Higgs mass ranges of 111.4 GeV to 116.6 GeV, 119.4 GeV to 122.1 GeV, and 129.2 GeV to 541 GeV. Higgs bosons are probably located at 126 GeV with significance of 2.9 sigma.[56] On the same day, the DØ and CDF Collaborations also announced further analysis, increasing their confidence that the data between 115-140 GeV is corresponding to a Higgs boson to 2.9 sigma, excluding mass ranges at 100–103 and 147–180 GeV.[57][58]
  • 4 July 2012 - the CMS at CERN team "announces the discovery of a boson with mass 125.3 ± 0.6 GeV/c2 within 4.9 sigma." This meets the formal level required to announce a new particle which is "consistent with" the Higgs Boson, but scientists are cautious as to whether it is formally identified as actually being the Higgs Boson, pending further analysis.[71]

"The God particle"

The Higgs boson is often referred to as "the God particle" by the media,[72] after the title of Leon Lederman's popular science book on particle physics, The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question?[73][74] While use of this term may have contributed to increased media interest,[74] many scientists dislike it, since it overstates the particle's importance, not least since its discovery would still leave unanswered questions about the unification of Quantum chromodynamics, the electroweak interaction, and gravity, as well as the ultimate origin of the universe.[72] [75]

Lederman said he gave it the nickname "The God Particle" because the particle is "so central to the state of physics today, so crucial to our understanding of the structure of matter, yet so elusive,"[72][73][76] but jokingly added that a second reason was because "the publisher wouldn't let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing."[73]

A renaming competition conducted by the science correspondent for the British Guardian newspaper chose the name "the champagne bottle boson" as the best from among their submissions: "The bottom of a champagne bottle is in the shape of the Higgs potential and is often used as an illustration in physics lectures. So it's not an embarrassingly grandiose name, it is memorable, and [it] has some physics connection too."[77]

See also

Template:Wikipedia books

Notes

  1. ^ Only 1% of the mass of composite particles, such as the proton and neutron, is due to the Higgs mechanism. The other 99% is due to the mass of the kinetic energies of particles inside baryons, all constrained by the strong interaction.

References

  1. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9374758/Higgs-boson-scientists-99.999-sure-God-Particle-has-been-found.html
  2. ^ a b c d "ATLAS experiment presents latest Higgs search status". CERN. 13 December 2011. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  3. ^ Griffiths, David (2008). "12.1 The Higgs Boson". Introduction to Elementary Particles (Second, Revised ed.). Wiley-VCH. p. 403. ISBN 978-3-527-40601-2. The Higgs particle is the only element in the Standard Model for which there is as yet no compelling experimental evidence.
  4. ^ Lee, Benjamin W.; Quigg, C.; Thacker, H. B. (1977). "Weak interactions at very high energies: The role of the Higgs-boson mass". Physical Review D. 16 (5): 1519–1531. Bibcode:1977PhRvD..16.1519L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1519.
  5. ^ "Huge $10 billion collider resumes hunt for 'God particle' - CNN.com". CNN. 11 November 2009. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  6. ^ As of 13 December 2011 ATLAS excludes at the 95% confidence level energies outside 116–130 GeV/c2 and CMS excludes at the 95% confidence level energies outside 115–127 GeV/c2.
  7. ^ "Detectors home in on Higgs boson". Nature News. 13 December 2011.
  8. ^ a b c "CMS search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson in LHC data from 2010 and 2011". CERN. 13 December 2011. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  9. ^ "ATLAS and CMS experiments present Higgs search status". CERN. 13 December 2011. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  10. ^ http://www.timeslive.co.za/scitech/2012/06/28/higgs-boson-particle-results-could-be-a-quantum-leap
  11. ^ "CERN to give update on Higgs search". CERN. 22 June 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2011.
  12. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/jul/04/higgs-boson-discovered-live-coverage-cern
  13. ^ http://www.corkman.ie/breaking-news/world-news/scientists-hail-god-particle-find-3158503.html
  14. ^ Goldstone, J; Salam, Abdus; Weinberg, Steven (1962). "Broken Symmetries". Physical Review. 127: 965–970. Bibcode:1962PhRv..127..965G. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.127.965.
  15. ^ Anderson, P. (1963). "Plasmons, gauge invariance and mass". Physical Review. 130: 439. Bibcode:1963PhRv..130..439A. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.130.439.
  16. ^ Englert, François; Brout, Robert (1964). "Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons". Physical Review Letters. 13 (9): 321–23. Bibcode:1964PhRvL..13..321E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321.
  17. ^ Higgs, Peter (1964). "Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons". Physical Review Letters. 13 (16): 508–509. Bibcode:1964PhRvL..13..508H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508.
  18. ^ Guralnik, Gerald; Hagen, C. R.; Kibble, T. W. B. (1964). "Global Conservation Laws and Massless Particles". Physical Review Letters. 13 (20): 585–587. Bibcode:1964PhRvL..13..585G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585.
  19. ^ G.S. Guralnik (2011). "GAUGE INVARIANCE AND THE GOLDSTONE THEOREM – 1965 Feldafing talk". Modern Physics Letters A. 26 (19): 1381–1392. arXiv:1107.4592v1. Bibcode:2011MPLA...26.1381G. doi:10.1142/S0217732311036188.
  20. ^ Higgs, Peter (1966). "Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons". Physical Review. 145 (4): 1156–1163. Bibcode:1966PhRv..145.1156H. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.145.1156.
  21. ^ S.L. Glashow (1961). "Partial-symmetries of weak interactions". Nuclear Physics. 22 (4): 579–588. Bibcode:1961NucPh..22..579G. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2.
  22. ^ S. Weinberg (1967). "A Model of Leptons". Physical Review Letters. 19 (21): 1264–1266. Bibcode:1967PhRvL..19.1264W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264.
  23. ^ A. Salam (1968). N. Svartholm (ed.). Elementary Particle Physics: Relativistic Groups and Analyticity. Eighth Nobel Symposium. Stockholm: Almquvist and Wiksell. p. 367. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  24. ^ "Physical Review Letters – 50th Anniversary Milestone Papers" (Document). Physical Review Letters. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)
  25. ^ "American Physical Society — J. J. Sakurai Prize Winners".
  26. ^ Merali, Zeeya (4 August 2010). "Physicists get political over Higgs". Nature Magazine. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
  27. ^ G.S. Guralnik (2009). "The History of the Guralnik, Hagen and Kibble development of the Theory of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Gauge Particles". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 24 (14): 2601–2627. arXiv:0907.3466. Bibcode:2009IJMPA..24.2601G. doi:10.1142/S0217751X09045431.
  28. ^ Guralnik (11 October 2011). "Guralnik, G.S. The Beginnings of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Particle Physics. Proceedings of the DPF-2011 Conference, Providence, RI, 8–13 August 2011". arXiv:1110.2253v1 [physics.hist-ph]. {{cite arXiv}}: Unknown parameter |publisher= ignored (help)
  29. ^ a b "LEP Electroweak Working Group".
  30. ^ S. Dimopoulos and Leonard Susskind (1979). "Mass Without Scalars". Nuclear Physics B. 155: 237–252. Bibcode:1979NuPhB.155..237D. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90364-X.
  31. ^ C. Csaki and C. Grojean and L. Pilo and J. Terning (2004). "Towards a realistic model of Higgsless electroweak symmetry breaking". Physical Review Letters. 92 (10): 101802. arXiv:hep-ph/0308038. Bibcode:2004PhRvL..92j1802C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.101802. PMID 15089195.
  32. ^ L. F. Abbott and E. Farhi (1981). "Are the Weak Interactions Strong?". Physics Letters B. 101: 69. Bibcode:1981PhLB..101...69A. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90492-5.
  33. ^ Bilson-Thompson, Sundance O.; Markopoulou, Fotini; Smolin, Lee (2007). "Quantum gravity and the standard model". Class. Quantum Grav. 24 (16): 3975–3993. arXiv:hep-th/0603022. Bibcode:2007CQGra..24.3975B. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/16/002.
  34. ^ Potential Higgs Boson discovery: "Higgs Boson: Glimpses of the God particle." New Scientist, 2 March 2007
  35. ^ Rincon, Paul (10 March 2004). "'God particle' may have been seen". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  36. ^ Rincon, Paul (14 June 2010). "US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles'". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  37. ^ a b W.-M. Yao; et al. (2006). Searches for Higgs Bosons "Review of Particle Physics". Journal of Physics G. 33: 1. arXiv:astro-ph/0601168. Bibcode:2006JPhG...33....1Y. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/33/1/001. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  38. ^ "CERN management confirms new LHC restart schedule". CERN Press Office. 9 February 2009. Retrieved 10 February 2009.
  39. ^ "CERN reports on progress towards LHC restart". CERN Press Office. 19 June 2009. Retrieved 21 July 2009.
  40. ^ "Interim Summary Report on the Analysis of the 19 September 2008 Incident at the LHC" (PDF). CERN. 15 October 2008. EDMS 973073. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
  41. ^ "CERN releases analysis of LHC incident" (Press release). CERN Press Office. 16 October 2008. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
  42. ^ "LHC to restart in 2009" (Press release). CERN Press Office. 5 December 2008. Retrieved 8 December 2008.
  43. ^ a b T. Aaltonen (CDF and DØ Collaborations) (2010). "Combination of Tevatron searches for the standard model Higgs boson in the W+W− decay mode". Physical Review Letters. 104 (6). arXiv:1001.4162. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.104f1802A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.061802. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |display-authors=1 (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  44. ^ a b "Fermilab experiments narrow allowed mass range for Higgs boson". Fermilab. 26 July 2010. Retrieved 26 July 2010.
  45. ^ a b The CDF & D0 Collaborations (27 July 2011). "Combined CDF and D0 Upper Limits on Standard Model Higgs Boson Production with up to 8.6 fb-1 of Data". arXiv:1107.5518 [hep-ex].{{cite arXiv}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  46. ^ "''CERN Bulletin'' Issue No. 18-20/2010 – Monday 3 May 2010". Cdsweb.cern.ch. 3 May 2010. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
  47. ^ a b "Combined Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches in pp Collisions at root-s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC". 24 July 2011. ATLAS-CONF-2011-112.
  48. ^ a b "Search for standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at sqrt{s}=7 TeV". 23 July 2011. CMS-PAS-HIG-11-011.
  49. ^ LHC: Higgs boson 'may have been glimpsed' – BBC News, 13 December 2011 – "two experiments at the LHC see hints of the Higgs at the same mass, fuelling huge excitement" ... "the simple fact that both Atlas and CMS seem to be seeing a data spike at the same mass has been enough to cause enormous excitement in the particle physics community."
  50. ^ a b "Search for Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in [[proton|p]]-[[antiproton|p]] collisions at sqrt(s)=1.96 TeV" (PDF). DØ Collaboration. 22 December 2011. Retrieved 23 December 2011. {{cite news}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  51. ^ a b "ATLAS and CMS experiments submit Higgs search papers" (Press release). CERN Press Release. 7 February 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-03.
  52. ^ a b ATLAS Collaboration (2012). "Combined search for the Standard Model Higgs boson using up to 4.9 fb-1 of pp collision data at s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC". Physics Letters B. 710 (1): 49–66. arXiv:1202.1408. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.02.044.
  53. ^ a b CMS Collaboration (2012). "Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at s=7 TeV". Physics Letters B. 710 (1): 26–48. arXiv:1202.1488. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.02.064.
  54. ^ "Tevatron experiments report latest results in search for Higgs". 7 March 2012.
  55. ^ Overbye, Dennis (7 March 2012). "Data Hint at Hypothetical Particle, Key to Mass in the Universe". NYT. Retrieved 7 March 2012.
  56. ^ a b ATLAS Collaboration (2 July 2012). "Combined search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector". arXiv:1207.0319 [hep-ex].
  57. ^ a b "Tevatron scientists announce their final results on the Higgs particle". Fermilab press room. July 2, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012.
  58. ^ a b The CDF & D0 Collaborations (2 July 2012). "Updated Combination of CDF and D0 Searches for Standard Model Higgs Boson Production with up to 10.0 fb-1 of Data". arXiv:1207.0449 [hep-ex].{{cite arXiv}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  59. ^ CERN press release #25.11, 13 December 2011 – "the statistical significance is not large enough to say anything conclusive. As of today what we see is consistent either with a background fluctuation or with the presence of the boson. Refined analyses and additional data delivered in 2012 by this magnificent machine will definitely give an answer"
  60. ^ CERN prepares to deliver Higgs particle findings - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Retrieved 4 July 2012.
  61. ^ "Mass hysteria! Science world buzzing over rumours the elusive 'God Particle' has finally been found- dailymail.co.uk". Mail Online. 24 April 2011. Retrieved 24 April 2011.
  62. ^ Brumfiel, Geoff (2011). "The collider that cried 'Higgs'". Nature. Bibcode:2011Natur.473..136B. doi:10.1038/473136a.
  63. ^ Butterworth, Jon (24 April 2011). "The Guardian, "Rumours of the Higgs at ATLAS"". Guardian. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
  64. ^ a b Rincon, Paul (24 July 2011). "Higgs boson 'hints' also seen by US lab". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  65. ^ "Combined Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches in pp Collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC" ATLAS Note (24 July 2011) (pdf) The ATLAS Collaboration. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  66. ^ Ghosh, Pallab (22 August 2011). "Higgs boson range narrows at European collider". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2011.
  67. ^ Geoff Brumfiel (18 November 2011). "Higgs hunt enters endgame". Nature News. Retrieved 22 November 2011.
  68. ^ Higgs boson coming into focus, say scientists (+video). CSMonitor.com (2012-03-07). Retrieved on 2012-03-09.
  69. ^ Lemonick, Michael D.. (2012-02-22) Higgs Boson: Found at Last?. TIME. Retrieved on 2012-03-09.
  70. ^ Press Conference: Update on the search for the Higgs boson at CERN on 4 July 2012
  71. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9374758/Higgs-boson-scientists-99.999-sure-God-Particle-has-been-found.html
  72. ^ a b c Ian Sample (29 May 2009). "Anything but the God particle". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  73. ^ a b c Leon M. Lederman and Dick Teresi (1993). The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  74. ^ a b Ian Sample (3 March 2009). "Father of the God particle: Portrait of Peter Higgs unveiled". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 24 June 2009.
  75. ^ "The Higgs boson: Why scientists hate that you call it the 'God particle'". National Post. 14 December 2011.
  76. ^ Alister McGrath, Higgs boson: the particle of faith, The Daily Telegraph, Published 15 December 2011, Retrieved 15 December 2011.
  77. ^ Ian Sample (12 June 2009). "Higgs competition: Crack open the bubbly, the God particle is dead". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 4 May 2010.

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Higgs boson.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Higgs_boson&oldid=500618428"