Jump to content

User:Arthur Warrington Thomas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Tiroinmundam (talk | contribs) at 10:07, 10 January 2013 (How I think of Wikipedia: Typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Uploading_images#Need_help_with_an_image_I_have_uploaded

How I think of Wikipedia

[edit]
An Islamic Flag, featuring the first Kalimah, the Shahada, used by Muslims. White flags with black lettering symbolically represent 'Dar al-Salam/Islam' and Black flags with white lettering symbolically represent 'Dar al-Harb/Kufr

I believe that Wikipedia is the future of knowledge distribution. Albeit, NOT at all the be all and end all! This I fear MUST be clearly pointed out!

However, I see Wikipedia as a “first point of contact” for source information. There is no doubt in my mind about this as Wikipedia supplies far more information on any given subject than any other Encyclopaedia or other source of information out there. This is simply a case of “more often than not.”

Wikipedia is a fantastic and ever growing resource for a “first point of contact” regarding substantial information on any subject. However, as with any source for information, it is never infallible and on this note I would always say that you should verify everything with secondary sources! I would say this with anything, not only Wikipedia. In fact, I would go as far as to say that you should do your own independent investigations into subjects of a personal interest and for basically furthering your own knowledge in any subject.

“A recent "Gadget Show" also compared Wikipedia with the chargeable and subscription based Brittanica equivalent, and came to a similar conclusion. They pointed out that Wikipedia was more likely to produce more information about current world people and information (the example they gave was that a search for Brad Pitt would only reveal a reference to Pitt the Elder in Britanicca), so it could be agrued that Wikipedia provides more information - albeit potentially biased or even just plain incorrect. It did however qualify this by saying that Wikipedia was an excellent first source of information, but that any information should be checked with a second reference source. I tend to agree - as long as you realise this when using it.“

Wikipedia works if verifiable references are given for information contained in its articles.

Down with the elite wisdom disinformation dissemination machine!

  • "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

- Sherlock Holmes, via Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

As so often, I am struck by the lengths Communists, Zionists and Neocons will go to create their own version of history. - Robert C Prenic, 02 December 2006)


Working on User:Arthur Warrington Thomas/Khalid Kelly for Khalid Kelly.

User:UBX/Qur'an Reader
This user lives in Jordan.

Working on Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan, Sheikh Abd Al-Aziz Fawzan Al-Fawzan, Sheikh Jamaal al-Din M. Zarabozo, Dr. Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali, Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Sheikh Muhammad bin Jamil Zeno and Batool Al-Toma.

Articles contributing too

[edit]

Nazi Expeditions

[edit]

Nazi mysticism

[edit]










.


Dar al-SalamDar ul-SalamDaar al-SalamDaar ul-SalamDar al-KufrDar ul-KufrDaar al-KufrDaar ul-KufrDar al-IslamDar ul-IslamDaar al-IslamDaar ul-IslamDar al-HarbDar ul-HarbDaar al-HarbDaar ul-HarbDar as-SalamDar us-SalamDaar as-SalamDaar us-SalamDar as-KufrDar us-KufrDaar as-KufrDaar us-KufrDar as-IslamDar us-IslamDaar as-IslamDaar us-IslamDar as-HarbDar us-HarbDaar as-HarbDaar us-Harb

Sheikh Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt after his conversion to Islam in 1998, wearing traditional Islamic clothing, a Thobe and a Kufi.
File:SyedHakeemAbyazQaradawi.JPG
fff


.












.







.


7/7 Truth Movement

[edit]

The 7/7 Truth Movement[1][2] [3][4] [5][6][7]is a collection of groups, individuals, and researchers questioning the official account of 7/7 who disagree to varying degrees with the mainstream media account of what occurred during the July 7th, 2005 London bombing attacks. It is similar to the 9/11 Truth Movement. They believe that the truth is not yet known by the general public, and state that they wish to bring the contrary evidence and analysis to their attention. The 7/7 Truth Movement is informal, decentralized and occasionally fractious; its members convene by electronic mailing lists, ongoing local meetings, national and international public conferences and online forums. They are dedicated to exposing the truth about 7/7 and Rumours and conspiracy theories about the July 2005 London bombings.

History

[edit]

The 7/7 Truth Movement was formed on the day of the London bombings of July 7th, 2005 as a loose knit group of individuals world-wide. Soon after, many of the actual surving victims and their familes and friends joined to attempt to expose the truth about the actual events.

Participants

[edit]

See also

[edit]
[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]

Category:July 2005 London bombings July 2005 London bombings, Rumours and conspiracy theories about the Category:Rumours and conspiracy theories about the July 2005 London bombings