User talk:Kumioko

; Archives
	Jun 2007–Nov 2007; Dec 2007–Feb 2008; Mar 2008–Dec 2008; Jan 2009–Jun 2009; Jul 2009–Dec 2009; Dec 2009–Jun 2010; Jul 2010–Feb 2011; Mar 2011–Jun 2011; Jul 2011–Dec 2011; Dec 2011–Jul 2012; Jul 2012–Sept 2012; Sep 2012–Dec 2012; Future; ; ;

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

In the near future I may not be checking my talk page as much. For important or urgent matters it might be faster to send me an Email.

User:Kumioko/TOC

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting re-hatting of off-topic digression on VPP. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For always putting the project first, for having a sense of honour and decency. Rich Farmbrough, 06:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Template:Z147

Thanks. Kumioko (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for referring to another editor as "a piece of trash", while knowing such conduct to be sanctionable as a personal attack: [1]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 21:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. This is the first block I actually deserved. Kumioko (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you also deserved the block for sockpuppetry I gave you. 28bytes (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's arguable. Unfortunately the way the rules are written in order for a clean start to be clean, there is a chance of it being called sockpuppetry. Also, there were some false accusions of sockpuppetry in my case. There were assumptions that some edits were me because they came form the same proxy server. That is because the Checkuser tool is far from perfect and difficult to use. That's why I just went back to using my original one. Because of my high edit count, wide breadth of editing and my knowledge of things like templates, policy and the history of the place it would have been impossible to start over. It would only be a matter of time before someone recognized me. Kumioko (talk) 22:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Truthfully, my situation was what opened my eyes to how screwed up things were, how often we get things wrong and how crappy editors are treated. Before that I thought very highly of the processes. I thought they worked and often supported them. Know I know better because I have been through it. Those who haven't been through it do not know how often the tools get things wrong, how often one bad admin decision can cause terrible harm to the pedia and how quickly the community turns on one of its own for petty and simple reasons without even taking the time to look into the situation. Kumioko (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]