Jump to content

User talk:202.156.10.11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HasteurBot (talk | contribs) at 19:01, 26 September 2013 (User:HasteurBot: Notification of CSD:G13 nomination on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment & Building Technologies). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roald Dahl, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Patrice Wilson. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Please see the talk page for Patrice Wilson (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Patrice_Wilson) for more information on why your edit has been reverted. Thanks. andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 15:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maris Stella High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ARK Music Factory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. werldwayd (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Anders Behring Breivik, you may be blocked from editing. Your comment comparing a mass-murder to a 'cool' video game was entirely inappropriate.  Chzz  ►  02:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Atmosphere of Earth, you will be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 06:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Project, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Richwales (talk · contribs) 01:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lee Taemin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of feeder teams in football, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 15:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chinese Singaporean, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 11:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Transfer factor with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Template:Z86Jim1138 (talk) 03:27, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three separate editors have now reverted your changes to transfer factor. Please do not replace your edits without establishing consensus on the talk page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 01:24, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Thieves Like Us (band) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Template:Z84Igoldste (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment & Building Technologies. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Honour and Passion, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. →εϻαdιν ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης 13:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A reply to your message

Hello, 202.156.10.11. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
Message added 02:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Homosexual agenda has been reverted.
Your edit here to Homosexual agenda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed email address removed) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information such as email addresses. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Ikshvaku dynasty was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the article, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Feinoha Talk, My master 22:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chingay Parade (South East Asia), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ZZArch talk to me 09:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

10-20-life

yes the penalties are the same if an imitation gun is used. KING GRIM LOL YO WHATS UP (talk) 08:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, your recent edits to the Shrek Forever After plot summary added a significant amount of unneeded detail and have been reverted. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You are welcome to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toy Story 3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Begoon talk 04:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Haskalah, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Avi (talk) 16:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

202.156.10.11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why the sudden block? I was only adding a Nazi flag to Jewish-related articles as a social experiment to see the Wikipedian community response.

Decline reason:

Well that's our response, we don't tolerate it Jac16888 Talk 12:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Inviting admins to fuck themselves probably doesn't help. --Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 19:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Methodology, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jojalozzo 03:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment & Building Technologies concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment & Building Technologies, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Environment & Building Technologies

Hello 202.156.10.11. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Environment & Building Technologies.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Environment & Building Technologies}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:202.156.10.11&oldid=574642413"