Jump to content

User talk:Victrix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Victrix (talk | contribs) at 09:26, 12 June 2006 (revert vandalism/ridiculous accusation by odd little stalker - all threats and harassment and no clue at all). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Wikipedia , I hope you will like it here and decide to stay.

You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some links I've found useful:

Also: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your username and the time after your comments. Signing with three tildes ~~~ will just sign your username.

I hope to see you around Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page!


Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ]

04:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. That's a lot to read. I will try to learn the rules here.
The four tildes things is pretty cool.
Victrix 04:29, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lightbringer

If you come accross a sockpuppet of his, make sure to put a tag {{Sockpuppet|username}} on the user page of that sockpuppet. --File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 17:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome aboard mate.

You might want to throw up a user info page, you're looking mighty naked in red in the history lists. Welcome aboard regardless, I'm not sure of your Wikipedian past or experience, but if you ever need assistance with anything, I am more than happy to help. :) 211.30.72.208 04:03, 18 October 2005 (UTC) (aka: Jachin)[reply]

I'll take you on your word that Ripper Notes content was used to source much of the article, so I've moved it to References, as you suggest. It would be a lot better if specific articles were cited, rather than the journal as a whole. That could, of course, include articles that aren't offered as online samples as well.
As far as external links to commercial sites go - use common sense. If the site is largely an advertising venue rather than a content repository, then the link shouldn't be there. In my judgment, the RipperNotes site — no matter how prestigious the journal itself — failed that test. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Bathory, Jakubisko

I realy don't understand what is your problem with movies in production. Your reverting is close to becoming arogant. I have read WP:NOT and I supplyed also the source of info, but there was no meaningful reply from you. If IMDB is not enough authoritative for you then check any famous actor on wikipedia. Nicolas Cage (the first I tryed) has four 2007 movies in his filmography. Try to remove them to see the reaction of wikimates if you are so convinced of being right. Jurohi 16:16, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... I see you have made good edits getting rid of nonnotable fiction junk and POV-pushing on Jack the Ripper and some other articles I've run across. Was wondering if you could look into the article mentioned above, where an abusive editor is making blind reverts with the sole reason given that I am allegedly making deceptive edit comments and being abusive, but with no justification at all (and there can be none) for the version he is reverting to. Thanks. DreamGuy 12:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like your strange little stalker is after me now too. Thanks a lot.  ;-) Victrix 00:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]