User talk:Pitcroft
Your request to delete this talk page
I have declined your request because user talk pages are not normally deleted, see WP:DELTALK. With a few exceptions, none of which apply here, you may blank anything you like from your user talk page, including this message, but the history is retained for the record. If you want more than that, and you are leaving Wikipedia permanently, see Wikipedia:Courtesy vanishing for what you can do. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 01:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sarah-Jane (talk) 10:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)November 2015
Pitcroft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why are my reverts and edits less valid than anyone else's? I have explained my reasons countless times to the other 'editors' on why their article is grossly inaccurate and very badly written! SPECTRE is an acronym and nothing has proven that otherwise, except for a minor quote from the Economist (though they are not the creators of the Fleming novels or the Bond films). The spelling and grammar is appalling in some places, and if the so called 'editors' had been more polite to start with I would have not been so vehement in my defence. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why are my reverts and edits less valid than anyone else's? I have explained my reasons countless times to the other 'editors' on why their article is grossly inaccurate and very badly written! SPECTRE is an acronym and nothing has proven that otherwise, except for a minor quote from the Economist (though they are not the creators of the Fleming novels or the Bond films). The spelling and grammar is appalling in some places, and if the so called 'editors' had been more polite to start with I would have not been so vehement in my defence. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why are my reverts and edits less valid than anyone else's? I have explained my reasons countless times to the other 'editors' on why their article is grossly inaccurate and very badly written! SPECTRE is an acronym and nothing has proven that otherwise, except for a minor quote from the Economist (though they are not the creators of the Fleming novels or the Bond films). The spelling and grammar is appalling in some places, and if the so called 'editors' had been more polite to start with I would have not been so vehement in my defence. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}