This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation
Agreed, this is not a valid dab page, same as 2015 France attacks. The perceived ambiguity derives from how we title the articles in the first place; none of them are truly ambiguous, nor would any of them ever be referred to as "Paris attacks". —Xezbeth (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I personally have no strong opinion whatsoever on this. I would say however in my mind France attacks or Paris attacks are valid search terms for the subject of these articles, although whether a DAB is necessary is more debatable..BletheringScot17:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)But it is a valid and entirely plausible search term. When I wanted the page on the latest incidents I searched 'Paris attacks' expecting it to lead eventually to the correct page - it didn't. Our naming is somewhat esoteric and I am sure many people would also search like this. We need to make sure that our guidelines don't get in the way of readers getting quickly and easily to the information they seek. I don't mind what solution we adopt provided we don't lose 'Paris attack' and 'Paris attacks' as search terms that lead somewhere useful. Just Chilling (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]