This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Moxy(talk | contribs) at 09:04, 14 December 2015(←Created page with '{{talkheader}} {{WikiProject Canada|class=B|importance=Top|history=yes}} {{WikiProject Sociology|class=c|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Philosophy|class=c|import...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:04, 14 December 2015 by Moxy(talk | contribs)(←Created page with '{{talkheader}} {{WikiProject Canada|class=B|importance=Top|history=yes}} {{WikiProject Sociology|class=c|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Philosophy|class=c|import...')
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.