Jump to content

User talk:Orangecones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 331dot (talk | contribs) at 00:57, 23 June 2016 (Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Automotive world history. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Orangecones, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as From Boxing Insider, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KJ Discuss? 22:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of From Boxing Insider

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on From Boxing Insider, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
  • It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ Discuss? 22:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2001 airmail stamp C137.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:2001 airmail stamp C137.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surnames and minor edits

I've reverted your recent changes to Pete Ricketts. Per WP:SURNAME and WP:SAMESURNAME, the subject of the article should be referred to by surname alone after the first mention, unless the subsequent mention is part of a list of persons with the same surname. You might want to look those passages over and make sure you haven't made any other edits contrary thereto.

Also, I note that you marked your changes as minor edits. Before you check that minor-edits box again, you should read WP:MINOR, which tells when it's OK to mark an edit as minor. Basically, the only time you should do so is when it's inconceivable that any editor could object to your edit for any reason. This is almost never; the only time I'd use it would be when correcting an obvious misspelling (e.g. "teh" instead of "the"), or correcting an indisputable punctuation or formatting error (adding a period to the end of a sentence, or the missing second close-bracket to a Wikilink).

The minor-edits thing is potentially problematic because some editors have their watchlists set up to ignore minor edits. To such an editor, your marking an edit as minor when it wasn't might look like an attempt to sneak through a potentially controversial change.

Basically, it never hurts not to check the minor-edit box, and it can cause misunderstandings if you check it when you shouldn't. I'd recommend never checking it, and tend to ignore its existence myself. — Ammodramus (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing research on the Cubs and keeping track of the owners was easier by listing full names in each and every situation. I apologize for going overboard. I really enjoy helping out as an editor and hope my contribution helps with keeping things in a correct manner and I will not check the minor edit box ..... Orangecones (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. No need to apologize; there're lots of Wikipedia policies and conventions, and it takes time to learn them all. — Ammodramus (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ies or 's

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lane#History

I do not know if 1950ies or 1950's would be better Orangecones (talk) 22:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have studied the lane numbers trying to figure out if HOV then 1 then 2 then 3 to the shoulder is correct. I call on my OnStar quite ofter to report accidents and I do not know if there is an adopted standard for number lanes when reporting the lane choice for an accident. Does this make sense? Orangecones (talk) 22:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For something like your question about the decade, it's a good idea to check the WP manual of style, which you can find at WP:MOS. For this situation, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Years_and_longer_periods calls for "1950s", with no apostrophe. (I'd personally use "1950's" in my non-WP writing, but when I'm editing WP, I have to abide by WP conventions.) — Ammodramus (talk) 11:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Orangecones. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
Message added 00:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ww2censor (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorch Fock (1958), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tovarishch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am very happy to get these feedback notices. I did not know the meaning of the word Tovarishch and noticed the was a related link with choices of different meanings of the word so I added brackets for other readers to be able to go to the page of choices to better understand the meaning of the word and the different uses of the word. Thank you for your guidance.Orangecones (talk) 07:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bigotry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intolerance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DPL bot I welcome the input and was thinking the many different meanings for the word BIGOT would be aided with a page stating did you mean. Thank you very much and I love the resources Wikipedia offers and the many opportunities to improve ones self. Thank you again. Orangecones (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arizona Lottery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environmental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources needed for changes or additions

Information icon Hello, I'm 32.218.41.207. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Knapp, Dunn County, Wisconsin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 32.218.41.207 (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thank you so much for the advise. I am a follower of Knapp WI and had the PO Box 123 at the Knapp postoffice for about 7 years. John Holley Knapp is the founder of Knapp WI. I have books at home to use as referencing the information Orangecones (talk) 03:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm Lambiam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Midnight, Frozen, Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, Samuel Osgood House (New York City), Space, and Geo (automobile), have been undone because they did not appear constructive. In particular, do not add trivial wikilinks. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  --Lambiam 21:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lambiam thank you so much for you guidance. This is a learning process and I welcome your help. Thank you again Orangecones (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American automotive history

We write a page using reliable sources. What you have is rather a list of existing pages related to American automotive history and I doubt anyone needs such a list.Xx236 (talk) 10:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC) Please compare Automotive industry in the United States and Timeline of North American automobiles.Xx236 (talk) 10:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American automotive history

Hello Orangecones,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged American automotive history for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Automotive industry in the United States.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 10:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Automotive world history

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Automotive world history. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of automobile manufacturers. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of automobile manufacturers – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 331dot (talk) 00:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orangecones&oldid=726571663"