Jump to content

User talk:82.38.157.176

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.38.157.176 (talk) at 21:25, 6 November 2017 (→future animated franchise). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Extended content

Hello 82.38.157.176!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (82.38.157.176) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 20:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your recent edits

Extended content

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most expensive animated films page

Extended content

I edited the links and added some new titles, first of all, you have to rename the title: "List of most expensive animated films", second, we have to decide on what is the lowest budget we can add, I say we put the limit somewhere at $140-$150m, because there are many animated films that have big budget that we may not have heard of, it doesn't matter if we have a top 50 or top 30, 25. I will find and add some new titles later. DCF94 (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How do we change tilte?

AfC notification: Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films has a new comment

Extended content
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Extended content

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid films submission

Extended content

Now that you have added the definition of hybrid films, you may go ahead and resubmit. I won't be the reviewer this time. I would prefer to get another reviewer's view. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun the Sheep Movie

Extended content

I have reverted your edit and ask that you take the issue to the talk page. First, the Variety cited source DOES NOT say $104 million. The article gives a vague, imprecise approximation, saying, "passed Sept. 14 the milestone $100 million global B.O. mark" without giving an actual number or where this claim came from, whereas Box Office Mojo, which uses studio-supplied figures and is WP:FILM standard, gives a precise figure. Frankly, this edit by an anon IP on Sept. 15 [1] feels promotional in nature. I have returned the figure to the long-stable version that was there for the bulk of this article's existence. If you wish to change that status quo, you need to discuss it on the talk page rather than edit-war. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most Expensive animated Film (November 15)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rhumidian was:
Requires additional formatting
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rhumidian (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 82.38.157.176, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rhumidian (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts by adding ~~~~ to your posts.

Extended content

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Talk:List of highest-grossing films. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! --rayukk | talk 20:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball franchise

Extended content

Found a source for the box office, wanna do the honours? DCF94 (talk) 19:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Extended content

Information icon Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia, 82.38.157.176. Your edit to Toy Story (franchise) was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  Thank you very much!  Paine  03:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please consider the creation of a free User account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Highest grossing hybrid films (November 30)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Highest-grossing films which combine Live Action with Animation, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 06:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

Extended content

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films#Spongebob movies".The discussion is about the topic List of highest-grossing animated films. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Paleocemoski 23:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Extended content

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm Krj373. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films/Archive 5 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not edit archived pages. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 22:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Wallace and Gromit characters (January 25)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devopam (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Extended content

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. There is absolutely no reason for you to be reverting the archive bot, and regularly using 5k on every edit. Please stop. Boomer VialHolla 08:37, 10 February 2016

82.38.157.176 (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

future animated franchise

Extended content
  † Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing 29 November 2024 in theaters around the world.
Highest-grossing animated franchises and film series[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show")
Rank Series Total worldwide box office No. of films Average of films Highest-grossing film

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Wallace and Gromit characters (February 22)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from http://shaunthesheep.com/slip. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most Expensive animated Film (March 3)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
None of the cited sources actually discuss the subject itself. You need to find a few sources that specifically discuss the topic "most expensive animated film". Discussion of indovidual films don't help the notability of this topic.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films

Extended content

Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Highest grossing hybrid films during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 03:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Highest-grossing hybrids Films

Extended content

82% of the films in the top 50 were released after 2000.

2006, 2010,2011 and 2016 are the most represented years on the list, with four films each. All of the films have had a theatrical run (including re-releases) since 1980, and films that have not played since then do not appear on the chart due to ticket-price inflation, population size and ticket purchasing trends not being considered. All films in the Alvin & the Chipmunks, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles , The Smurfs,Stuart Little, Scooby-Doo,Garfield, Ghostbusters, Looney Tunes, Ted and Spongebob Squarepants franchises are in the top 50 highest-grossing live action - animated films.Arthur,,Diary of a Wimpy Kid, The Pink Panther and Mickey Mouse universe also appeared frequently, Alvin & the Chipmunks and The Pink Panther, is the most represented franchise with 4 films each.

highest grossing hybrid films
Rank Peak Title Worldwide gross Year Ref
1 1 The Smurfs $563,749,323 2011 [1]
2 2 Ted $549,368,315 2012 [2]
3 3 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles $477,204,754 2014 [3]
4 1 Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel $443,140,005 2009 [4]
5 3 Tron: Legacy $400,062,763 2010 [5]
6 1 Alvin and the Chipmunks $361,336,633 2007 [6]
7 6 The Smurfs 2 $347,545,360 2013 [7]
8 3 Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked $342,695,435 2011 [8]
9 1 Enchanted $340,487,652 2007 [9]
10 1 Who Framed Roger Rabbit $329,803,958 1988 [10]
11 2 Stuart Little $300,135,367 1999 [11]
12 1 Ghostbusters $295,212,467 1984 [12]
13 6 G-Force $292,817,841 2009 [13]
14 3 Casper $287,928,194 1995 [14]
15 6 Scooby-Doo $275,650,703 2002 [15]
16 16 Paddington $268,047,808 2014 [16]
17 17 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows $245,623,848 2016 [17]
18 17 Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Road Chip $234,798,636 2015 [18]
19 3 Space Jam $230,418,342 1996 [19]
20 20 Ghostbusters: Answer the Call $229,147,509 2016 [20]
21 6 Elf $220,443,451 2003 [21]
22 3 Ghostbusters II $215,394,738 1989 [22]
23 21 Ted 2 $213,734,783 2015 [23]
24 14 Yogi Bear $201,584,141 2010 [24]
25 7 Garfield $200,804,534 2004 [25]
26 11 Hop $183,953,723 2011 [26]
27 27 The BFG $183,345,589 2016 [27]
28 5 Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed $180,949,045 2004 [28]
29 8 Kill Bill Vol. 1 $180,949,045 2003 [29]
30 9 Stuart Little 2 $169,956,806 2002 [30]
31 14 The Pink Panther $158,851,357 2006 [31]
32 26 Goosebumps $150,170,815 2015 [32]
33 11 Charlotte's Web $144,877,632 2006 [33]
34 34 Pete's Dragon $143,695,338 2016 [34]
35 12 Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties $141,702,264 2006 [35]
36 28 Walking with Dinosaurs $126,546,518 2013 [36]
37 28 Saving Mr. Banks $112,544,580 2013 [37]
38 19 Arthur and the Invisibles $107,944,236 2006 [38]
39 19 The Water Horse: Legend of the Deep $103,071,443 2007 [39]
40 1 Mary Poppins $102,272,727 1964 [40]
41 20 Arthur and the Revenge of Maltazard $78,520,547 2009 [41]
42 20 Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days $77,112,176 2012 [42]
43 20 The Pink Panther 2 $75,946,615 2009 [43]
44 9 Looney Tunes: Back in Action $68,514,844 2003 [44]
45 1 Song of the South $65,000,000 1946 million[45]
46 46 Monsters Trucks $64,493,915 2016 [46]
47 21 Aliens in the Attic $57,881,056 2009 [47]
48 4 Revenge of the Pink Panther $49,579,269 1978 [48]
49 19 Fat Albert $48,551,322 2004 [49]
50 4 The Return of the Pink Panther $41,833,347 1978 [50]

References

  1. ^ "The Smurfs - International Box Office Results". Box Office Mojo. December 15, 2011. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
  2. ^ "Ted (2012) - International Box Office Results". Box Office Mojo. October 25, 2012. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
  3. ^ "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014) - International Box Office Results". November 20, 2014. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
  4. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alvinandthechipmunksii.htm
  5. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=tron2.htmm
  6. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alvinandthechipmunks.htm
  7. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=smurfs2.htm
  8. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alvin3d.htm
  9. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=enchanted.htm
  10. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=whoframedrogerrabbit.htm
  11. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=stuartlittle.htm
  12. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=ghostbusters.htm
  13. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=g-force.htm
  14. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=casper.htm
  15. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=scoobydoo.htm
  16. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=paddington.htm
  17. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=tmnt2016.htm
  18. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alvin4.htm
  19. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=spacejam.htm
  20. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ghostbusters2016.htm
  21. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=elf.htm
  22. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ghostbusters2.htm
  23. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ted2.htm
  24. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=yogibear.htm
  25. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garfield.htm
  26. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=ihop.htm
  27. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=bfg.htm
  28. ^ httphttp://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=scoobydoo2.htm
  29. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=killbill.htm
  30. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=stuartlittle2.htm
  31. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=pinkpanther05.htm
  32. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=goosebumps.htm
  33. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=charlottesweb.htm
  34. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=petesdragon2016.htm
  35. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=garfield2.htm
  36. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=walkingwithdinosaurs.htm
  37. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=savingmrbanks.htm
  38. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=arthurandtheinvisibles.htm
  39. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=waterhorse.htm
  40. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=marypoppins.htm
  41. ^ http://www.jpbox-office.com/fichfilm.php?id=9837
  42. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=diaryofawimpykid3.htm
  43. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=pinkpanther2.htm
  44. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=looneytunesbackinaction.htm
  45. ^ Cite error: The named reference Gabler was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  46. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=monstertrucks.htm
  47. ^ http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=aliensintheattic.htm
  48. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=revengeofthepinkpanther.htm
  49. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=fatalbert.htm
  50. ^ http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=returnofthepinkpanther.htm

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2016(UTC)

Highest-grossing hybrids Franchises and Film Series

Extended content

The following chart is a list of the highest-grossing hybrids film franchises. The Alvin & the Chipmunks franchise is the most successful, with worldwide box office totals of nearly $1.4 billion. A given franchise needs to have at least 2 theatrically released films to be on this list. The Smurfs franchise has the highest per-film average, with nearly $455.7 million per film.


  † Background shading indicates that at least one film in the series is playing in the week commencing 29 November 2024 in theaters around the world.
Highest-grossing animated franchises and film series[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show")
Rank Series Total worldwide
box office 		No. of films Average of films Highest-grossing film

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2016(UTC)

Your recent edits

Extended content

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of highest-grossing openings for animated films  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to List of highest-grossing animated films. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing...

Extended content

In light of this edit made recently by this account, I thought it important to stress a few things to the person(s) editing from this IP address. To contribute to Wikipedia, a degree of competency is required. You should be able to add sources yourself when you add or change content. Spelling and grammar are important as well. You appear to be using this talk page as a test page, and as this account has made hundreds of edits over that past few months, I strongly suggest you create an account so that you get the use of a sandbox, along with other added benefits. Either way, as long as you continue editing;

Thank you - theWOLFchild 02:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Extended content

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Toy Story. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 19:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. An edit that you recently made to Toy Story (franchise) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MBlaze Lightning -talk! 12:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar (March 29)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Particularly still needs any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:List of Wallace and Gromit characters

Extended content

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:List of Wallace and Gromit characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.klikdvd.com/product/detail/10596/shaun-the-sheep-the-farmers-llamas-2015.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 333-blue 13:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - theWOLFchild 18:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Most expensive animated films has been accepted

Extended content
Most expensive animated films, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hybrids Films concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hybrids Films, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 May

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Extended content

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing animated films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. When you change data that is well-supported by references you must update the reference with something that supports your changes Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hybrids Films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hybrids Films".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Epic rap batlles of cartoons concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Epic rap batlles of cartoons, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:4DB2:920F:8A07:D8CC. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rugrats (film series) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:4DB2:920F:8A07:D8CC (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Trivialist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tinker Bell (film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Live action toy story (August 7)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralizationsAreBad was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Toy Story instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GABgab 00:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alvin and the Chipmunks (film series) have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 17:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

List of highest-grossing animated films

Extended content

Hi -- I changed the wording regarding the Wallace & Gromit films because it's confusing and unintentionally misleading "All films in the Wallace & Gromit franchise" aren't on the list -- the one theatrical film and a compilation of the shorts are, but the individual shorts aren't. (Also, I'm a fan of Aardman and W&G, so I'm not saying this because I don't want them included. :) Trivialist (talk) 13:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

all theatrically released films are one the list the on theatrical film and a compilation of the shorts as well as the Shaun movie.
But that's not what you put in the article. You said "All films in the Wallace and Gromit Franchise are on the list." The shorts are all films in the W&G franchise, and none of them are on the list, or even eligible for the list. Technically, it should be "All Wallace and Gromit-related theatrically released features are on the list," but that may be too wordy and qualified a statement to include. Trivialist (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If u are a wag fan you may be interested in helping me created List of Wallace & gormit characters page.82.38.157.176 (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Future stop motion list

Extended content
Highest-grossing stop motion films[# 1]
Rank Title Worldwide gross Year Ref

Your draft article, Draft:Longest runing animated tv series

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Longest runing animated tv series".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Sam Sailor 22:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of highest-grossing animated films, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cars (franchise)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Extended content

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Timmy Time, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Reference errors on 20 October

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Shaun the Sheep, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Shaun the Sheep

Extended content

Edit reverted - no Fair Use Rationale has been generated to allows that non-free image on this page. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nativity (film series) has been accepted

Extended content
Nativity (film series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content

Control copyright icon Hello 82.38.157.176, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Nativity (film series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuckie Finster (November 6)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Rugrats characters instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It's rare for characters to have their own article because they are simply best known and based for that 1 TV series, therefore it's best to have the information there.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing none share universe films (November 8)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chenzw was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chenzw  Talk  13:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 November

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing none share universe films (November 13)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
not one reference refers to 'none share universe films'
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 02:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing none share universe films (November 18)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What is the subject?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes (November 23)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mickey Mouse (TV series) instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 02:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Timmy Time episodes (November 23)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Timmy Time instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Extended content

Information icon Hello, I'm Feinoha. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of most expensive films without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Feinoha Talk 00:54, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Finding Dory, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Wild Thornberrys. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You seem to be making numerous changes to numbers without giving an explanation in the edit summary, providing a source or otherwise explaining where the information came from. If you are having trouble, please ask for help here, on my talk page or on the articles' talk pages. Thanks. SummerPhDv2.0 16:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Franchise) has been accepted

Extended content
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Franchise), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Smmurphy(Talk) 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of the highest grossing share universe films (December 4)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of the highest grossing share universe films. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is just a Marvel Cinematic Universe version of List of highest-grossing films.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- TheMagnificentist (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animted films in Canada and the United States (December 26)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see WP:CS, WP:REFBEGIN. Let the article provide something more than what is already available in http://www.boxofficemojo.com .
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devopam (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Lion Guard: Return of The Roar".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Extended content

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of highest-grossing animated films into Draft:List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 January

Extended content

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Extended content
Hello, 82.38.157.176. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by John from Idegon (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States (February 5)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Per WP:NOTSTAT.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aardman filmography (February 8)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Aardman_Animations#Filmography instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm just not really sure that this needs to be on its own page just yet, especially as it's already in the main article and doesn't pose a huge problem just yet. I recommend making a post in the talk section of the main article for the company and proposing a content fork. If the suggestion is successful (ie, multiple people say yes) then this would need some sort of lead paragraph to tell people what it's about.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States (February 10)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToonLucas22 was:
No improvement over previous rejected version. Please address the concerns stated on comments and previous rejection rationales before resumbitting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TL22 (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of the highest grossing shared Universe films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the highest grossing shared Universe films".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of longest runing animated tv series

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of longest runing animated tv series".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Reach Out to the Truth 23:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Extended content

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Disney revival era, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States (April 4)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topcipher was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of highest-grossing animated films instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TopCipher (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disney revival era (April 9)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't find much mention of the the words "Disney Revival era" in the references. They are basically talking about the movies, animations and box office but very few (or none) seem to discuss solely on the subject. Remember that the subject must be notable and not its contents. If you find reliable sources to verify its notability, here are a few more things you should fix-
  • Add a citation to the lead (optional)
  • Add a citation to quotes (must)
  • Fix cite errors (if you can that is)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yashovardhan (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of animated television series by episode count

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of animated television series by episode count".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Longest running animted tv series

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Longest running animted tv series".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chuckie Finster

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chuckie Finster".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Eve (2015 TV series) episodes (June 10)

Extended content
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 10:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Mickey Mouse (TV series) episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of the highest grossing none share universe films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the highest grossing none share universe films".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of the highest grossing share universe films

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the highest grossing share universe films".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Timmy Time episodes

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Timmy Time episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Extended content
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Draft:List of Eve (2015 TV series) episodes, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of highest-grossing films in Canada and the United States concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of highest-grossing films in Canada and the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aardman filmography

Extended content

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aardman filmography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Live action toy story concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Live action toy story, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Disney revival era concern

Extended content

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Disney revival era, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Disney revival era

Hello, 82.38.157.176. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disney revival era".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Cite error: There are <ref group=#> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=#}} template (see the help page).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:82.38.157.176&oldid=809053988"