Jump to content

User talk:Anirudh Emani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andy Dingley (talk | contribs) at 11:15, 5 January 2018 (Indian locomotive class WAG-12). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Anirudh Emani. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, it's looking good.

Can you please clarify this "twin-section" business? It's not clear what that means. Also is it Co-Co or Bo-Bo? That's a hugely powerful loco for only four axles.

Hopefully we can get some photos once it's in service. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. WAG-12 has a total of 8 axles. The locomotive itself can be seen as two identical subsections facing away from each other. Kind of like double heading but here the 'two' locomotives are actually just one single locomotive consisting of two units, each with Bo-Bo configuration and each section has only one cab. I found an alternative image that is closer to the WAG 12. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 10:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, that makes things clearer. So it's really a Bo-Bo+Bo-Bo and these are considered as single units? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]