User talk:Russian Rocky
Welcome
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
And here are several pages on what to avoid:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the button; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place
This welcome message was sent by Staffwaterboy at 20:37, February 22, 2009 (UTC) this template was orgnialy created by User:Download |
Warcraft
What move or other action do you want done that the redirect is blocking? and where has it been discussed? DES (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- The redirect (Warcraft) leads to Warcraft (series), where saying “"Warcraft" redirects here. For the first game in the series, see Warcraft: Orcs & Humans.” There are no disambiguation pages, and the redirect still leads to Warcraft (series). Therefore, the optimal solution in this case—renaming, Warcraft (series) → Warcraft, where extra brackets will be removed. --Russian Rocky (talk) 01:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- You may well be right that that would be optimal -- your argument makes some sense. However, this is a major page with lots of incoming links. I urge you to discuss the move on Talk:Warcraft (series) first, and make sure that it has consensus or at least no significant opposition. DES (talk) 02:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- The Naming conventions (WP:PRECISION) saying: "Remember that concise titles are generally preferred." Definitions in brackets are used in the case of ambiguity, but there no disambiguation pages, and no pages with the same title. I did not understand what you mean, talking about incoming links. It is deletion for renaming, therefore "Warcraft (series)" will be a redirect to the article of series, instead the redirect "Warcraft". DES, I would not want to make a discussion for such obvious renaming, because it will take a lot of my time, along with all these checkings and replies at the discussion page. If you believe, that the deletion request for renaming was not constructive, just revert my edit. I will not argue.--Russian Rocky (talk) 03:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think it was unconstructive, and your citation of the naming conventions is quite correct. But I do think that renaming major pages without any discussion is generally a mistake, and I won't do the delete and move in such a case. I will start the discussion myself, and we'll see where it goes. DES (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well I see another admin did the delete and move. I won't pursue the matter further. DES (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- The Naming conventions (WP:PRECISION) saying: "Remember that concise titles are generally preferred." Definitions in brackets are used in the case of ambiguity, but there no disambiguation pages, and no pages with the same title. I did not understand what you mean, talking about incoming links. It is deletion for renaming, therefore "Warcraft (series)" will be a redirect to the article of series, instead the redirect "Warcraft". DES, I would not want to make a discussion for such obvious renaming, because it will take a lot of my time, along with all these checkings and replies at the discussion page. If you believe, that the deletion request for renaming was not constructive, just revert my edit. I will not argue.--Russian Rocky (talk) 03:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- You may well be right that that would be optimal -- your argument makes some sense. However, this is a major page with lots of incoming links. I urge you to discuss the move on Talk:Warcraft (series) first, and make sure that it has consensus or at least no significant opposition. DES (talk) 02:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
November 2013
I reverted your edit on Anatoly Wasserman. First, what you reverted was not vandalism. You may want to read WP:VANDALISM to learn what vandalism is. Second, the pieces you want to add indeed do have BLP issues. Please start discussion at the talk page of the article before adding them. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- You have deleted a lot of information provided by the Russian language sources. Also, I have no time to discuss with another wikipedia bureaucrat (who actually knows Russian) about "what vandalism is". Bye, keep it as it is. Russian Rocky (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Captain Pronin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lamis Elhadidy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stringer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vladimir Litvinenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ukrainian line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean Tatar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Russian Rocky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:According to Mathew poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:According to Mathew poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Russian Rocky. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)