User talk:Razr Nation

Four years ago ...
Latin American performers
	... you were recipient; no. 360 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

Contributions

Schedule · Academy · To do · RFA · Templates · Files · Barnstars & Awards · Featured content · Good articles · GA reviews · DYK · DYK reviews · Articles

Razr Nation's archives	Current discussion	Go to 2016	Go to 2017-19	Go to 2022	Go to 2023

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Time flies, doesn't it. Can't believe it's been this long. → Call me Razr Nation 16:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Missing Wikipedians

Hello Razr Nation. I see you haven't been around in a while, and have added your name to the page linked above due to inactivity. Please remove yourself from the list if you return. Best regards, Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Razr Nation|<font color="#333">'''Razr'''</font>]] [[User talk:Razr Nation|<font color="#336699">'''Nation'''</font>]]

: → Call me Razr Nation

to

''<small>→ Call me</small>'' [[User:Razr Nation|<b style="color: #333">Razr</b>]] [[User talk:Razr Nation|<b style="color:#369">Nation</b>]]

: → Call me Razr Nation

—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:04, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, updated. → Call me Razr Nation 05:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:El Amor Ricardo Arjona.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:El Amor Ricardo Arjona.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Metamorfosis Enterprises.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Metamorfosis Enterprises.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed with the references in Cittadella (Gozo) ′′(I am reviewing this GA nominated article)

Please could you help me with the reference section of the article, where every reference comes from the Wayback machine, and none include the access date. Are these references acceptable as they stand? Hel-hama 19:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Amitchell125: Hey there. The access date isn't the most important piece of data in the reference. It does help you check when it was last opened so what you can do is open each reference today, and if they all are online then use September 16, 2018 as the accessdate. You can ask the article writer to do this. Just make sure the content is indeed supported by the sources. Cheers. → Call me Razr Nation 20:09, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's really helpful - thank you.Hel-hama 20:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

I have completed my review of the Cittadella article, and I am confident the review is OK. Please would you mind checking it and letting me know of any changes I should make (mainly because of the references}? Hel-hama 20:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

I could, but remind me on Sunday. This week I am quite busy. Cheers. → Call me Razr Nation 05:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]