User talk:GhiathArodaki

—

Welcome!

Hello, GhiathArodaki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drown Ghost

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Drown Ghost, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yahya Arodaki

Hello, GhiathArodaki. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Yahya Arodaki, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! GhiathArodaki, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 00:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Yahya Arodaki. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

المنع

لا يا سيدي أنت مخطئ بالكامل، لا أحد يزوّر التاريخ ولا أحد نسمح له باللعب بتاريخنا، ولمعلوماتك أنا من أنصار توحيد بلاد الشام كما كانت سابقًا، فلا تتحدث معي وكأنني من جماعة النزعات القوميَّة التفتيتيَّة أو كأنك تعرف شيئًا عني. أسلوبك في الكلام خاطئ ومستفز، وهذا سبب منعك، كما أنك قمت بتخريب صفحة المستخدم رافي، وتخريب صفحة أي مستخدم أمر لا نتحمَّله ولا نسمح به على الإطلاق. بالمختصر لو كان الحق معك فقد أصبح الحق عليك بعد أن قمت بذلك. بالنسبة لكيفيَّة كتابة سوريا أو سورية، فقد جرى نقاش طويل قبل بضعة شهور انتهى إلى أنَّ كل شخص يكتب على كيفه طالما أنَّ الكتابتين معتمدتين، ولكن لا يأتي أحد ويُغيّر الكلمة بالأخرى بحجَّة أنها أصح. النقاشات اللغويَّة لا تنتهي ومن الأفضل لك وللجميع الابتعاد عنها. أتمنى منك عندما تعود للموسوعة أن تبتعد عن الأسلوب الذي انتهجته في الحديث، وأن تصرف وقتًا أكبر في التحرير، فهمنا الأكبر ليس كيف نكتب اسم دولة. تحياتي--باسم (talk) 21:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

لا مُشكلة، كل شخص يُفكّر بطريقة معيَّنة والكثير لا ينفع معه الإصرار والتعنّت. في المستقبل عندما تُلاحظ مستخدم يتصرَّف بهذا الأسلوب خذه بحسب عقله أو معتقده، وإن ظهر لك أنَّه لا طائل من النقاش والحديث فتجنَّبه. أتمنى لك عودة ميمونة إلى الموسوعة عمَّا قريب. تحياتي--باسم (talk) 12:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

أنا شخصيًّا لم أسمع به، ويبدو أنَّ القسم الأكبر من الزملاء لم يسمع به أيضًا. على كلٍ يمكنك تأكيد وجوده وأهميته عبر إدراج مصادر تتحدث ، عنه: مواقع إلكترونيَّة من غير المنتديات، أو كتاب ما، أو نشرة جامعيَّة، أو مقالة في جريدة او مجلَّة، سواء ورقيَّة أم إلكترونيَّة--باسم (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

في جميع الأحوال يجب إضافة مصادر تؤكد وجوده، سياسة الموسوعة هي إضافة ولو مصدر واحد يؤكد صحة ما كُتب، وإلا سوف يتكرر السيناريو معك مجددًا. إن لم أحذفها أنا، سيحذفها غيري بسبب ما ذكرته لك. جرّب أن تحضر مصدر واحد على الأقل يؤكد أنَّ هذا الإنسان موجود بالفعل، وإنَّه ألَّف كتاب كذا وكذا، يمكنك دعم قولك بأنَّه ألَّف كتاب معيَّن عبر تصوير غلاف الكتاب مثلًا ورفعه على الموسوعة العربيَّة، سيظهر عليه بطبيعة الحال إسم الكاتب وربَّما السنة، أي عام الطباعة والنشر--باسم (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Social anxiety disorder(Book) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social anxiety disorder(Book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social anxiety disorder(Book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 08:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Racha Arodaky

The article Racha Arodaky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. mabdul 11:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yahya Arodaki

The article Yahya Arodaki has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. mabdul 11:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Social anxiety disorder(Book). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. mabdul 16:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GhiathArodaki. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Social anxiety disorder(Book), you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. This follows from your statement that the author of this book is your brother. AllyD (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

Hi there, I can see you have been busy and I'm sorry that you have had all these unpleasant-looking notices from people about the articles you have created. There are a couple of problems, one being that I am guessing you are not a native English language speaker, and some of your contributions don't really make sense in English. One sentence in the Racha Arodaky article reads: Never whoremongers, and interpretations of Racha Arodaky are still yet discovered by the delicacy of the attacks and the vitality of sounds. I can only guess that this is a machine translation but it just doesn't mean anything.

A second problem with this and your other articles is that you have no reliable sources for what you are writing. Please click on that blue link to see what we mean by a reliable source, and if you can find some please try adding them into your articles.

A third problem is a guess, that from your username you are somehow related to the subjects of the articles you have written. This does create a conflict of interest which means you may not be the best person to write about your family members. Just because they are important to you doesn't mean they or their work meets the standards of notability here on Wikipedia. The one exception I could find is Racha Arodaky who does seem to be notable - if you can find any articles about her please use these to support the article.

If you're not sure how to do this, please post here by editing this page and I or other editors will certainly try to help. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 20:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Reposted from KDB talk page.) I'm not writing about my family member because they are important to me , if did that i would write about all of my family members , but i'm only writing about the important people and notable people in my family members in the world or a country, Like Racha is a know classical piano player , Yahya arodaki was a known economist in syria , and made tasks for syria , And I Only wrote about a book who the creator of him is one of my family members , This doesn't mean I writing about my family members because they are important to me.GhiathArodaki (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK that's fine, you're only writing about the family members who are important. The problem is that it's not your opinion about their importance that counts. It's whether other people (newspapers, TV stations etc) have found them sufficiemtly notable to talk about them. I could find no coverage of your brother's book anywhere; nobody seems to have reviewed it or written about it. Without some independent evidence of notability it's not possible to keep the article. As I said above, the article about Racha Arodaky may be different because I think there are independent sources about her. Even so, that article has been very badly translated into English. You restored the section reading Never whoremongers, and interpretations of Racha Arodaky are still yet discovered by the delicacy of the attacks and the vitality of sounds. Do you know what this means? Do you understand what a whoremonger is? You are editing the English language Wikipedia, which means you need to write in good English. I'm going to try and tidy up that article to remove the sentences that are nonsense, and if I can I'll try and find some sources. Please don't revert what I do to the article. And can we continue this discussion here? Just reply by posting your response below mine here. that way the discussion is all in one place. Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 22:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok for Racha Arodaky she was awarded , and france 24 talked about her , also she had many interviews Yahya Arodaki made many interviews , and in in newspaper. my brother's book was created by his search about the diseases, the publisher liked the search and told him to make it a book, i'm not an english bad language , also it's not my main language , I Translated the Racha arodaky article because it was in france , so i didn't understand anything in the france version, so the people I'm writing about all of them important in Tv and newspaper. best regards GhiathArodaki (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but it's not enough to say that these people are important; you have to demonstrate it. If they have been discussed in newspapers, books or TV you have to give examples of the sorts of publications that have mentioned them. Your brother's book I'm afraid is not notable. Not every book is notable, and most books that have ever been published don't have an article about them in Wikipedia. Please do click on the blue links I've made and see what they say - they will help you to understand what is needed here and why your articles will be deleted unless some sources can be found. About your standard of English - I'm afraid my own view is that you simply don't write it well enough yet. What about contributing to Wikipedia in your own language - you would find it much easier to contribute and other people would not have to correct your work so much. Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 09:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, for the book if you want you can put it as a source in the external links in the main article of the disease,i used translate google so that why my english isn't good , but as you here my english isn't that bad , i'll try and search for sources , best regardsGhiathArodaki (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

نقاش على صفحة المستخدمFaris El-Gwely

http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%84%D9%81:Egypt-Flag-Map-MEast-Africa.png كيف تضع علم مصر في هذا العمل فوق خريطة سورية ؟ هذا يعد إهانة هل تقبل أن أضع غلم سورية فوق غلم مصر ؟ 178.61.35.103 (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

   لا يحق لك أن تحاسبني في شيء لا يخصك، وإن كنت ترى هذه إهانة فأنت الوحيد الذي تشعر بها، وهذا رأيك الشخصي ولا يهمني، وأنا أرى أن مصر فوق الجميع شئت أم أبيت، وهذا رأيي كذلك ولا يحق لك التعقيب عليه! انتهى! --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 22:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

شئت أنت أم أبيت , رأيك يهين الشعب السوري , أنا أرى أن سورية فوق الجميع , و أرى أن مصر هي قطعة أرض من سورية سرقت منا

ما رأيك إذا كنت تحويلها هكذا

أنا لا أحاسبك لماذا تقول أن مصر هي القوة العظمى هذا رأيك

لكن لا تضع علم مصر فوق خريطة سورية

لأن سورية لا تهان

يحق لي الدفاع عن وطني لا أسمح لك بالتكلم معي بهذه الطريقة

الزم حدودك و اعرف من أنت و اعرف مكانتك

و لا أسمح لك بوصفي بالمهان

أمثالكم من يهانون

'سورية فوق الجميع

و بالأخص فوق مصر

لولا سورية و العراق لن تكون مصر قوة عظمى كما تتخيل

لا يحق لي التعقيب عن رأيك إلا إذا كان يمس وطني , هذه إهانة كبرى لسورية لن أسمح بها !

رغم أنفك و أنف الجميع مجددا سورية فوق الجميع و فوق مصر GhiathArodaki (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

واضح أنك لا تفهم العربية جيداً، قلت لك لا تعقب على رأيي أي لا تراسلني في صفحة نقاشي، احتفظ باعتراضك لنفسك، لأنه لا يُمثل إلا نفسك، وتعصبك الأعمى هذا يدل على ضعف موقفك، لذلك فقد حظيت بما أريد. شاهد هذا الفيديو حتى تشتعل نار الغيرة أكثر في صدرك --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

لا أفهم العربية أكثر منك , بل أنا سيد اللغة العربية , و بما أنك تريد إشعال نار الغيرة فيبدو أن عقلك لا يساوي عقل النملة , أما إنعقك تحاول إشعال غيرتي هذا الذي يدل على ضعف موقفك , و يبدو أنك محاور غير ذكي , و لاتفهم بأسلوب الحوار , و كل ما تريده هو استفزاز محاورك , إذهب إلى مدرسة الحوار ثم ارجع و حاورني , أنا لن أصغر عقلي مثلك

و أنا حظيت بما أريد أيضا , لقد عكست أخلاق بلدك

فالمثل يقول

أخلاق المرء مراة لنفسه

للأسف كنت أظن أن أهل مصر ناس طيبون , لكنهم ( أو بعضهم) تافه و صغير العقل

و كما قلت سابقا

الزم حدودك و اعرف منزلتك و مقامك , و اعرف من تكلم

شكرالأخلاقك الرفيعة

GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

السادات يستدل ؟

أضحكتني

من هو السادات ؟

إذهب و أحضر لي فيديو يقول النبي فيه من هم أصل العرب

سيدنا إبراهيم من حضارة بابل , أي عراقي

و يقال أن سيدنا ادم نزل في اليمن

اذهب و اختر شخصيات يأخذ برأيها و يعرف من هي و من مكانتها , بالمناسبة الفيديو و نقاشك أضحكني و لم يحرق قلبي , بل زادني وثوقا بأن عقلك صغير و لست محاورا جيدا

GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

ماذا تقصد بوضع قالب التحذير ؟ صفحة النقاش الخاصة فيني في ويكيبيديا العربية , أم شئ أخر ؟ الرجاء التفسيرGhiathArodaki (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

لقد حذرتك من التلاعب بصفحة نقاشي، وواضح أن طفل صغير يريد اللعب بالأزرار لا أكثر.... هذا إنذار أخير وأرجو أن تفهم هذه المرة حتى لا تنال أي عواقب أكثر من ذلك. --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 07:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

لقد حذرتك وقد أعذر من أنذر، انتهى النقاش! --Faris El-Gwely (talk) 07:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

هل تظن أنك تخيفني , أنت تلغي نقاشا كاملا و هذا لا يجوز , و من أنت حتى تهددني ؟ إن كنت بنظرك طفل صغير يلعب بالأزرار , فأنا عقلي كبير أم أنت فعقلك صغير , اذهب إلى الحضانة أيها الفرعون ثم كلمني أرجوك , أنا أستهزئ مما تكتب كلام سخيف و مضحك كف عن إضحاكي إذهب و انضجGhiathArodaki (talk) 07:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK you two, that's enough. First, this is the English language Wikipedia and transactions here need to be understandable by all editors. Occasional elements of another language are fine but if you want to do this in Arabic go elsewhere. Second, don't do this kind of thing even in English. If you have a disagreement then reach a compromise or get someone else to give you a third opinion. This is not what talk pages are for, so knock it off. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 08:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yahya Arodaki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yahya Arodaki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yahya Arodaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

I know you already know about this, but I'm supposed to do it anyway. --Stfg (talk) 14:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you gonna upload the pictures? it seems to be the right next step. --Stfg (talk) 10:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I Will Soon, Thank you 178.61.35.103 (talk) 10:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

حذف تراكي ياردلي

.. مرحبا.. تم حذف الصفحة لكونها غير ملحوظة (في المرة الأولى) من جهة، إضافة إلى أنها ترجمة آلية غير مفهمومة بالمرة (في المرة الثانية)، ثم كونها تتطرح للاستفتاء مثلما قلت فهذا لو كان هناك شك في أمرها..بينما كانت تستوفي معايير الحذف السريع بحالتها التي حذفت عليها..تحياتي--ولاء عبد المنعم (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ispifoney Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ispifoney Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.

Very sorry, Ghiath, but articles must have content, not merely an image. --Stfg (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Unitedeconomicofarableague.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Unitedeconomicofarableague.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبا غيث، تطلب مني التجاوب، بماذا يمكنني أن أساعدك. Osamaalsaadi Talk 20:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute with Faris knight

I've already asked you to stop this dispute, which doesn't belong here. Please don't make any more posts like these ones - this is the English Wikipedia, and you must use the English language here. If you can't, you're in the wrong place. Please in future (1) use English when writing, even to fellow Arabic speakers; (2) stay off Faris's talk page and (3) don't pursue fights from the Arabic Wikipedia over here. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 22:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:IsraeliRevoulotion.png

Thanks for uploading File:IsraeliRevoulotion.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify

Ghiath, what is the purpose of File:IsraeliRevoulotion.png and Template:User Israeli Syrian Revolution? --Stfg (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They Are showing my opinion on the syrian revolution, I was trying to find a code for creating the template, If you know where could i find ?, thanks.GhiathArodaki (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied your reply here to keep it threaded. Please don't add comments about things to sections of my talk pages that are about other things. Provide new section headers for new topics.

If you wish to express your opinion of the Syrian revolution", why are you involving Israel? The image and template appear to be very insulting. Please clarify that (please do it here). --Stfg (talk) 13:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that Israel is the cause of The Syrian Revolution, I'm not insulting, I saw this photo as the best to be for this opinion, I'm not meaning any insulting,But if there is an insulting point you can Say it to me so i can fix it,Best RegardsGhiathArodaki (talk) 13:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, GhiathArodaki. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. There's a problem with both of these items. They appear to have been created to promote a political point of view about a highly volatile subject. While userpage content about politics is allowed (a user box that states "I am a Republican" is okay, for example), I think both of these are outside the limit of what the community will find to be acceptable. I am going to nominate both the user box and the flag for deletion as a way to get wider input as to whether these items belong on this wiki. -- Dianna (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

رفع المنع

مرحباً أخي غيث، رفعت عنك المنع، لِما رأيت عندك من حوار هاديء في رسائلك الأخيرة، أتمنى أن تساهم في الموسوعة بشكل بنّاء، وتتواصل مع من اختلفت معهم وبقية المستخدمين بأجمل التواصل وأطيب الكلمات، وتذكر بأن الجميع هنا متطوعون لخدمة الموسوعة والمعرفة البشرية، فينبغي أن يكون هذا الهم المشترك باعثاً للأخوة بيننا جميعاً، وأهلاً وسهلاً بك مرة أخرى في ويكيبيديا. Osamaalsaadi Talk 23:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:IsraeliRevoulotion.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IsraeliRevoulotion.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User Israeli Syrian Revolution

Template:User Israeli Syrian Revolution, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Israeli Syrian Revolution and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User Israeli Syrian Revolution during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 00:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Meetingcyprusprisedint.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Meetingcyprusprisedint.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:RussiaandSyriameeting.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:RussiaandSyriameeting.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Unitedeconomicofarableague.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Unitedeconomicofarableague.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SovietandSyriameeting.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SovietandSyriameeting.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Trade relations to Israel.(Book).gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Trade relations to Israel.(Book).gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Flag of syria. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Abdo45 (talk) 21:01, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater Syria Map.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greater Syria Map.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 02:31, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your edit war

Hello GhiathArodaki,

I understand that you feel passionate about Syria, it's flag and it's future but it's clear from your edits on the Flag of Syria and related articles that your contributions are not neutral and that you are singlehandedly undoing changes from multiple users to reflect your standpoint. Most users on Wikipedia try to be neutral and objective and that is what the article on the Flag of Syria should be as well. This is difficult enough in light of the current syrian crisis and your contributions do not help.

Please read wikipedia's standpoint on Edit warring: An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement by discussion. Edit warring is unconstructive and creates animosity between editors, making it harder to reach a consensus. Users who engage in edit wars risk being blocked or even banned. Note that an editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring, whether or not the edits were justifiable: it is no defense to say "but my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring". more...

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Renetus (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GhiathArodaki,

I hope you will read this. Let me explain my possition: I'm from the Netherlands and have no special connection to Syria and no preference for either of the two flags currently used in Syria. I agree that the two starred red-white-black flag has official status under the current Assad government and that this flag is not necessarily an Assad symbol.

The problem is that the current situation in Syria is complex and that both Assad and the opposition are claiming power in Syria. The opposition has gained so much international recognition that it can not be ignored. Naming the red-white-black the only official flag of Syria would not represent a neutral point of view. Therefor I (and other users) try to avoid the use of official.

It's clear from your edits that you are not neutral and you are not complying with wikipedia's neutral point of view principle.

Aside from wether you are right or "telling the truth" to constantly revert an article to your version or your truth without attempting to reach a compromise. This is called an "Edit War".

Would you accept the following compromise? - To call section 1 and 2: Official flag used by the Assad government Flag used by the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces - List the Independence flag (2012-current) in the gallery with the note that it is used in areas controlled by the opposition.

Renetus (talk) 09:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I accept of course with this fair thing , but the section one :

Official Flag used by Assad government and (Alot, some , half, some of opposition) and natural in syria GhiathArodaki (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti

Proposed deletion of Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti

The article Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a Google translation of the Arabic wikipedia article without any real work, hence the poor formatting, loss of sources, etc

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nil Einne (talk) 16:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ghiath has already deprodded it. No point going to AfD in my opinion, as the subject is notable. I've tagged it to receive a proper translation. (Ghiath, you don't want to remove that banner. It will get a better translation for him.) You don't put {{ITN candidate}} on the page itself, but at WP:ITNC. However, there is no point doing that for this article, as the English is not yet good enough. --Stfg (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Syria article

What I meant was that the Syria is under contested status. So we can't put the red flag unless we put the green flag as well. I tried putting both in but the infobox can't fit both in without messing up the size of one or the other's flags. So can you please self-revert. Sopher99 (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Red flag is put in the arabic version you can see it, The Official flag now is red not green , green is just a symbol not official.GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit-warring and POV-editing, as you did at Flag of Syria. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GhiathArodaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reason, No Edit war, The one who must be block is Alhanuty GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your behaviour that led to you getting blocked; you were edit warring, and you breached 3RR, so the block it justified. If you want to be unblocked, you need to focus on your own behaviour, rather than talk about the actions of other editors. Specifically, you must demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked and commit not to continue the same behaviour again. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 16:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GhiathArodaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reason For blocking GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)}[reply]

Decline reason:

Sure there's a reason. You were edit warring; the edit war stopped as soon as the two of you were blocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why are you repeatedly deleting sourced material?

At the Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti article you deleted edits describing Al-Bouti as
known for his outspoken supporter of President Bashar Assad^[1]
and
Islamic scholar of Syria (rather than a "Shaykh of scientist of Levant")
here
and later here

virtually every non-Syrian regime news source has described al-Buti as a supporter of Assad. Examples:

"Shaykh of scientist of Levant" is ungramatical and a bad translation.

Please reply on the talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mohamed_Said_Ramadan_Al-Bouti#GhiathArodaki.27s_edits --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC) --BoogaLouie (talk) 14:07, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't replay on else where except here, as you see i'm blocked, Now ,

First , When taking a source you musn't take from a non-syrian news only , the second , Yes he supported The regime , but he isn't known for supporting the regime , he is the shaikh of scientis of levant , "The great islamic scientist of scientists of levant" , He is a well known shaikh , so that what should be written , not an islamic scholar and a regime supporter , this is insulting to talk a regime supporter, espicially for a scientist like him, third , if you want to say he supported assad regime , it can be discribed in the 2011 protests , but in a good way, That's why i always delete it, so your mistakes :

1.He is not known for supporting assad regime.

2.He is the shaikh of scientists of levant. GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no wikipedia policy saying editors must not take from "non-syrian news only". But if there was the article would read something like:

"According to _____ source Al-Buti was a regime supporter. However Syrian news sources deny that he was."

But where are there sources denying he was a regime supporter? Not mentioning it yes, denying it, no.

Fourthly, you are editing on English language wikipedia. In English Al-Buti is not a "scientis" as there is no such word, only "scientist" and "science". But he is not a scientist either as that term is reserved for people practicing Science (the systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. In Arabic -- ulama, trained Islamic scholar, scientist -- all share the same root, but not in English)

"shaikh of science" is also incorrect because "Shaikh" in English (usually corrupted to sheik) does not identify someone as a religious scholar but is an Arabic honorific term more likely to be used for head of a tribe. --BoogaLouie (talk) 15:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scientist in Islam , not a scientist in real , You (again) said he was known for supporting the regime , this can be post on the Syrian 2011 protest not in the introduction, and he is not known for that. he is not a simple Scientist , he is the Great Scientist Of Levant and that should replace the Islamic Scholar.GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:The Mufti of syria.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:The Mufti of syria.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:The Mufti of syria.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:The Mufti of syria.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:The Mufti of syria.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:The Mufti of syria.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:The Mufti of syria.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

greate job , now to the next picture.GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for a resumption of edit-warring after your last block and the same POV-pushing, as you did at Flag of Syria. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GhiathArodaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What Edit warring ? , All what I Have done is correcting sentences and putting the write thing , as you with the opposition is making wikipedia biased to them, Besides i was not reported, what type of democracy do you call yourselves ? GhiathArodaki (talk) 12:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

(a) Wikipedia is not a democracy. (b) Yes, you continued to edit war. (c) You didn't need to be "reported"; your contributions are public and you were observed immediately continuing to edit war after your previous block expired. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No , I Wasn't edit warring , I was correcting mistakes , and there wasn't a war yet, In Democracy I wasn't taking about A Political thing,As i see you don't like the true things because you Masters don't like it.GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You simply continued to do the same kind of edits after getting unblocked. Why didn't you try to discuss at the talk pages your changes (actually before doing them)? You don't have get to be reported if you simply redo the changes you already did.

Start to discuss (and not by using edit summaries) controversial changes before doing them.

"what type of democracy do you call yourselves ?" - I don't understand. We aren't any direct democracy, we trying to build an encyclopedia upon on facts. mabdul 13:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss, that was my first step , But do you know The Syrian Opposition ? , They started Their Silly thingsGhiathArodaki (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you discussed at Talk:Flag of Syria, but actually you couldn't provide any reference so that (for example) an Indian, or a reader from South Africa could verify your facts (or claims). You always have to remember that this is a global encyclopedia and because everybody can edit Wikipedia, we create a system that every fact/claim has to be verifiable by independent, 3rd party, and reliable sources.

Otherwise everybody can say that (for example) George W. Bush is an asshole. This is clear vandalism, but with what argument you would have removed it, if we hadn't any rules like the verifiability?

In that discussion Talk:Flag of Syria#Naming of the current red-white-green flag actually everybody was against your claims and your advice "GO READ HISTORY BOOKS" doesn't help. Which one? It's similar if I ask you: "I want to know which mobile is the best for me" and get the answer: "use google"... (you can exchange the question with de facto every question!) mabdul 06:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These are not claims but true, You can read at wikipedia arabic the history of Syria , I Would like to tell you the green flag was put in 1930s before the Independence by France.GhiathArodaki (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And what happens if you added it there? I can edit the German Wikipedia and say the opposite of Arabic Wikipedia... Who is right then? mabdul 10:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

German True source of history in the dutch version , because they know their country history better , like me , Syrian and I Know my Country history better , the same thing comes to Arabi Wikipedia .GhiathArodaki (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So somebody who emigrated from Syria and lives since years in Germany (and speaks both languages) write an article in the German Wikipedia and the article get promoted to Featured Article.

And now I change or create an article in the Arabic version of Wikipedia, although I only had a small language course in Arabic: why would you trust the Arabic version more then? Why do you think the Arabic version is more reliable? Please rethink: this is a global encyclopedia and we only trust on sources we can verify. (Sources don't have to be in English nor be accessible online!). mabdul 13:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Trust the arabic version because the people on the arabic version when creating a thing related to arab world , they know it best, Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia , But , it is different from wiki to wiki, Version to Version , Every version know best about it's history, Sources are not always correct and that is why wikipedia is not a 100% trusted encyclopedia.GhiathArodaki (talk) 18:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GhiathArodaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no any reason , No edit warring yet happened GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Ypu need to step back and rethink your approach to this. You were blocked before for edit warring on this exact same subject. As soon as you were unblocked you waded right back in with the same edits. We're not going to sit here and wait for you to do it a few more times at that point, you have already made your intentions clear enough by your actions. Edit warring is not tolerated. Period. If you can't discuss things instead of just trying to force the article to say what you want then you are not going to be able to edit here. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RcF about Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti

here --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC) As you see down , I'm blocked , This is my respond : The Plan greater syria doesn't have any hand of Great Scientist of levant , because That was said on TV by many araibian Channels , Including Syria TV And NewTV ETC , Levant Includes Islamic countries also rather than "Israe" "As to me I don't claim it as state, But that is the true now, Anyway This is not our talk , Levant Includes 3 Islamic countries Rather than syria , Palestine(West Bank and Gaza Strip) , Jordan and Lebanon , Also the shiekhs of islam works are not in a country , they work for the World wide , Take it as a rule for all shiekhs in the world , so that Shiekh Al-Bouti worked for the world not for Syria Only , You cannot write Regime Supporter Because he wasn't known for that , Plus , This would be very insulting for a big scientist or allem like him, Like for example , Al-qaradawi Wasn't known for supporting the arab Spring , and if that was wrote it will be very insulting , because also he is a big scientist or allemGhiathArodaki (talk) 18:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GhiathArodaki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Just want you to unblock the page [1] Because i want to respondGhiathArodaki (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will just have to wait for your block to expire. If you didn't want to have to wait, then you shouldn't have edit warred and edited to promote a point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you attempt to evade this block again, you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia ever again. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Care For you and the policesGhiathArodaki (talk) 07:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just like any other editor here, you are free to attempt to persuade the community to change the policies you don't like. But until they are changed, your only choices are to abide by those policies when editing, or stop editing here altogether. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cemetery for Muslims

The article Cemetery for Muslims has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A poorly written dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. glossologist (talk) 03:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cemetery for Muslims for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cemetery for Muslims is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cemetery for Muslims until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove AFD notices from articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cemetery for Muslims. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Stfg (talk) 12:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Yahyaarodakimeetingwithcypruspresient.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Yahyaarodakimeetingwithcypruspresient.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's more, this is the same picture as File:Meetingcyprusprisedint.jpg which you uploaded before and was deleted, and you also uploaded to Commons, and it was deleted from there too, as "missing permission". This has already been explained to you by Dianna and others, who know what they are talking about. --Stfg (talk) 11:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Know , i'll tell you a new thing , Yahya was the deputy of economic minister of syria , You know , i've got bored from wikipedia and it's problems .GhiathArodaki (talk) 11:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Account creation request declined

You requested another account via the account creation tool. I have dropped your request. You are walking a very thin line right now. If you are unable to be productive and stick to a single account, you will end up getting yourself blocked. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 17:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other flags used in Syrian Civil War

HI GhiathArodaki, I saw you tried to add two other flags to the Flag of Syria article. I support the idea but I think it would be best to add them in a separate section called "Other flags used in Syrian Civil War" because they do not have as much support as the first two flags. It would be interesting to know who is using these flags and in what areas. It would also be good to know if these flags are used publicly and if they have support under parts of the population (I could imagine the western kurdistan flag to be more accepted under kurds and the black flag only under certain people). Last but not least: If you edit the article use the Preview button until you are satisfied with the result. Now I see that you try to edit the article and have trouble to get the images right in the history. This way you screw up the article several times and have to correct it and this is visible in the article history. If you use the preview function you can try your edit before you publish it. Cheers. Renetus (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you do that for the 3 red stars flag ? , you know leave me alone and read my main page , i'll not a

contribute here anymore  .GhiathArodaki (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Your recent editing history at Israel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GhiathArodaki. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent editing history at Steve Jobs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ANEW#User:GhiathArodaki reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: ). — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Israel. Amaury (talk) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring despite previous blocks for it, and a clear battlefield mentality in your approach to editing here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks i wanted that from a long time :D .GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well congratulations then, you've successfully behaved disruptively enough to not be welcome here anymore. For future reference, another way to stop doing something you don't want to do but that is entirely voluntary is to just stop doing it. We call that exercising self-control. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for congratulations , i'm not happy to be in a racism place .GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^ KARAM, ZEINA. "Sheikh Mohammad Said Ramadan Al Buti, Syrian Pro-Assad Cleric, Killed In Damascus Bombing". Huff Post. Retrieved 23 March 2013.

[karam-1] KARAM, ZEINA. "Sheikh Mohammad Said Ramadan Al Buti, Syrian Pro-Assad Cleric, Killed In Damascus Bombing". Huff Post. Retrieved 23 March 2013.

[1]