User talk:Marnie Hawes
Welcome!
|
References in leads
Hi there - thanks for making this edit to Coxton Tower earlier. I dropped by because I wanted to explain why I've reverted it, just for your future reference.
As explained at WP:LEADCITE, citations are not required in the lead section of an article if the lead is summarising sourced information in the body of the article. (In practice, they're actually discouraged, to make the lead easier to read.) In this case, the assertion defining Coxton as a tower house in Moray is repeated in the first sentence of the 'description' section, and is cited to a very reliable source (a Pevsner guide), so it doesn't need to be supporting with any further refs; also, the ref you added (the Castles of Scotland website) is not really a reliable source. It's a great website, I personally find it interesting and well-written, but it's a blog - it's run by a single person with no editorial oversight - so we shouldn't use it, especially when better sources are available to support the content.
I hope that makes sense - seriously, thanks for taking an interest in the article and for trying to help out, I just wanted to explain to you why I undid your work. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 23:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Title mismatch
Hello, [1] was not a PDF with the same title (maybe it had the title mentioned somewhere inside but that's not what we need). Nemo 14:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Nascenia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nascenia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 15:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Nascenia Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nascenia Logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nascenia (September 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nascenia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nascenia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Marnie Hawes!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nascenia (September 6)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nascenia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nascenia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Bikkhob
Hello dear Marnie Hawes! Can you make an article about movie Bikkhob starring Sunny Leone in item song? Thank you! --89.110.1.24 (talk) 09:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kabuliwala, a 2006 Bengali film.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kabuliwala, a 2006 Bengali film.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rutger Hoedemaekers (September 19)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rutger Hoedemaekers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rutger Hoedemaekers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rutger Hoedemaekers has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong (talk) 09:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Marnie Hawes! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:51, Monday, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Marnie Hawes! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:01, Monday, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Marnie Hawes! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 18:17, Monday, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Nomination of Josh Rimer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Rimer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Rimer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Marnie Hawes! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 12:25, Wednesday, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
September 2019
One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.
I warned you once already, here. DO NOT ADD LINKS to publications when those links can neither be traced to an author of the publication nor to the publisher of the publication. Someone else's class reading list is right out. You did it once on List of NP-complete problems and now you've done it again on Lloyd's algorithm. If you're using bot software (OABot), and you can't control it to not do this, then you need to not use it at all, or you will lose your editing privileges entirely. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- My apology. I missed your last message. Next time, I will be careful. Thanks for notifying. Marnie Hawes (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- And yet, you immediately did it again. I have blocked you from editing; you can be unblocked (by me or any other admin, which you can request by using {{unblock}} here) if you promise to stop using OABot or other bot software, only edit manually, and stop trying to add links to references. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- My apology. I missed your last message. Next time, I will be careful. Thanks for notifying. Marnie Hawes (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Marnie Hawes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't do it intentionally and I won't use it anymore. Marnie Hawes (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
please unblock me.OAbot is the only bot tool I used. I didn't do it intentionally and I won't use it anymore. Marnie Hawes (talk) 16:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Marnie Hawes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understood why my edit right is blocked. I won't add copyright content again and I won't use OAbot or any other bot tool without knowing how to use it appropriately. I promise to make productive contributions with manual editing instead of bot edit.
Accept reason:
Ok, you're unblocked for now. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Paid editing
Your user page announces that you do editing paid by Upwork, but that is just a freelancer marketplace. I cannot find anywhere you disclosing who the client is. This throws all of your edits into doubt. Please disclose your clients. --Nat Gertler (talk) 10:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Rocky De La Fuente, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajid Sadi
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Marnie Hawes (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Hello Marnie Hawes. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Marnie Hawes. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Marnie Hawes|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. You continue to edit as a stated paid editor without announcing who your client is, as is required.Template:Z159 Nat Gertler (talk) 10:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi! NatGertler, I found you very cooperative to correct me every time I made mistakes. I really appreciate your help and I am extremely sorry for my mistakes. One more thing, what I added today was some information about Roque's son Ricardo from an already added source(Orlando Weekly)on that article. I reused the reference for that piece of information. Another one, about the banks: I found it on Wikinews. I thought it was a reliable source. Believe me, I was waiting for your corrections. :) Thanks for supervising me.
- I hope an explanation will make it clear about my Paid contributions. I added that paid disclosure when I was supposed to get paid for an article. But unfortunately, that one was deleted. The client disagreed to pay for it. So, I didn't get any payment. I am willing to remove the paid disclosure because I am making contributions voluntarily since then. I am not involved in Black Hat or any strategies which can threaten my existence on Wikipedia. I made mistakes, I know that. But, I would like to learn from my mistakes.
- My edits on Roque De la Fuente are not paid. I became curious about Mr. De La Fuente after I heard about him from one of my Friend "Hafiz" living in Arizona. I was not familiar with that name before. His career made me curious about him. So, whenever I find something about him I check if that info is included on his page or not. My intention was not to promote him. My intention is to add more values to existing articles or creating articles on people or topics that meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia.
- One more thing, I was looking for adoption. Is there any opportunity to get adopted for any sort of voluntary work like adding sources or information on any Wikiproject? I would like to help. I am very much interested to work on film and biography related articles. Marnie Hawes (talk) 19:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Even if your client didn't end up keeping their end of the bargain, your "I'm a paid editor" disclosure should include the identity of your client and what article you were editing for them (even if it doesn't now exist). Otherwise, you're saying "I'm a paid editor but I'm not telling you who for or where", and the default assumption is that any edit of yours is likely to be paid for - particularly if the edit seems a bit promotional. So please edit your user page to include that information.
- The problem with the statement about Rocky's son was not with the sourcing, or even with the fact that it was in the article - it was where in the article it was. You put it in the section on Rocky's 2020 presidential campaign, and there was no sign that Ricky's 2018 candidacy had any relevancy to that section. Had there been a section of "Personal life", which is normally where we list things like spouses and children, you could put it there. (I was editing on a tablet at the moment, which is an awkward editor for trying to add a section with.)
- Another edit that you did around the same time, which I have not yet tried to address, is deleting an online reference because that page was no longer on the Internet. While that is an understandable instinct, we actually have better ways to deal with that in most cases... when you take away a reference, it often leaves information unreferenced, and there are usually ways to get a copy of a missing webpage. See Wikipedia:Link rot for more information.
- I am not looking to adopt - really, at the moment, I'm looking for less responsibility in my life, not more! And I haven't really dealt with the adoption process. You might check out Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area to see if that would help you on your quest. Meanwhile, I'm usually happy to answer the occasional question, if my sometimes-busy life permits. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for guiding me. I have added the information on my user page. Marnie Hawes (talk) 05:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I have evidence (which can be obtained by a Google search) that you are being paid to edit Rocky de la Fuente page. Do you still want to maintain that you are editing out of "curiosity"? 2409:4071:2307:AB59:7616:FADE:92A0:80FF (talk) 09:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it would be really graceful for me to get paid. I am doing a thorough research on him out of curiosity and editing his page to add more information into it. I will add paid contribution disclosure with client name If I get an opportunity to get paid for it. Marnie Hawes (talk) 18:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Marnie Hawes, your editing suggestions are on the way
SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!
- haunted place ([[WP:haunted place|project page]], [[WT:haunted place|talk page]])