Russian Ground Forces
Сухопутные силы России Sukhoputnyye sily Rossii Russian Ground Forces | |
---|---|
Active | May 7, 1992 - present |
Country | Russian Federation |
Role | Ground warfare |
Anniversaries | October 1 |
Commanders | |
Current commander | Alexey Maslov |
The Russian Ground Forces (Template:Lang-ru) are the land forces of the Russian Federation, formed from parts of the collapsing Soviet Army in 1992. While the Russian Ground Forces in their present form are only fourteen years old, Russian officials trace their antecedants' history through the Imperial Russian era back to the time of Kievan Rus. [1] Since 1992 the Ground Forces have had to withdraw many thousands of troops from former Soviet garrisons abroad, while being extensively committed to the Chechen wars, and peacekeeping and other operations in the Soviet successor states (what is known in Russia as the 'near abroad').
Since 1991 inability to accept the new strategic circumstances,[2] a crippling shortage of funds, and the wasting away of the Russian people's belief in the Armed Forces (not helped by rising levels of dedovshchina) has led to a steady decline in military capability. Professionalisation is now slowly taking place, but there is little hope for a rapid rise in effectiveness. Alexander Golts, a long-time Russian military journalist, describes the problems:
Since 1999 the defense budget has grown more than three times—rising from 109 billion rubles to 346 billion (in 2003). However, no positive changes have come about: the level of combat readiness and discipline is just as low as it was few years ago. All of this means that the Russian armed forces are not ready to defend the country and that, at the same time, they are also dangerous for Russia. Top military personnel demonstrate neither the will nor the ability to effect fundamental changes.[3]
Mission
The primary responsibilities of the Ground Forces are the protection of the state border, combat on land, the security of occupied territories, and the defeat of enemy troops. The Ground Forces must be able to achieve these goals both in nuclear war and non-nuclear war, especially without the use of weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, they must be capable of protecting the national interests of Russia within the framework of its international obligations.
The Main Command of the Ground Forces is officially tasked with the following objectives:[4]
- The training of troops for combat, on the basis of tasks determined by the Armed Forces' General Staff.
- The improvement of troops' structure and composition, and the optimization of their numbers, including for special troops.
- The development of military theory and practice.
- The development and introduction of training field manuals, manuals, and methodology.
- The improvement of operational and combat training of the Ground Forces.
History
Russian Armed Forces |
---|
Staff |
Services (vid) |
Independent troops (rod) |
Special operations force (sof) |
Other troops |
Military districts |
History of the Russian military |
As the Soviet Union dissolved there were some efforts made to keep the Soviet Armed Forces together as a single military for the new Commonwealth of Independent States. The last Minister of Defence of Soviet Union, Marshal Yevgeny Shaposhnikov, was appointed supreme commander of the CIS Armed Forces in December 1991.[5] Among the numerous treaties signed by varying republics in order to direct the transition period was a temporary agreement on general purpose forces, signed in Minsk on 14 February 1992. However, once it became clear that Ukraine, and potentially the other republics, were determined to undermine the concept of joint general purpose forces, and to form their own armed forces, the new Russian government made its move.[6] Boris Yeltsin signed a decree on the formation of a Russian Ministry of Defence on 7 May 1992, bringing the Russian Ground Forces into existence along with the other parts of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. At that time the General Staff was in the process of withdrawing tens of thousands of personnel from the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany, the Northern Group of Forces in Poland, the Central Group of Forces, the Southern Group of Forces in Hungary, and from Mongolia. Thirty-seven divisions had to be withdrawn from the four groups of forces and the Baltic States, and four military districts totalling fifty-seven divisions were handed over to Belarus and Ukraine.[7] Some idea of the scale of the withdrawal can be gained from the division list here. For the dissolving Soviet Ground Forces, the withdrawal from the former Warsaw Pact states and the Baltic states was a extremely demanding, expensive, and debilitating process.[8] As the military districts that remained in Russia after the collapse of the Union were mostly comprised of the mobilisable cadre formations, the Russian Ground Forces were to a large extent created by relocating the formerly full-strength formations from Eastern Europe to those under-resourced districts. However, the facilities in those districts were quite inadequate to house the flood of personnel and equipment returning from abroad, and many units "were unloaded from the rail wagons into empty fields."[9]
The need for destruction and transfer of large amounts of weaponry under the Conventional Forces in Europe treaty also necessitated great adjustments.
Post-Soviet reform plans
A reform plan was published on 21 July 1992 in Krasnaya Zvezda[10], the Ministry of Defence newspaper. Later one commentator said it was "hastily" put together by the General Staff "to satisfy the public demand for radical changes."[11] The General Staff, from that point, become a bastion of conservation, causing a buildup of troubles which later became critical. The reform plan advocated a change from an Army-Division-Regiment structure to a Corps-Brigade arrangement. The new structures were to be more able to cope with a frontless situation and be more capable of independent action at all levels. Cutting out a whole level of command, leaving two rather than three higher echelons between the theatre headquarters and the fighting battalions would produce economies, increase flexibility, and simplify command-and-control arrangements.[12] The expected total changeover to this new structure actually proved to be rare, patchy, and sometimes reversed. More brigades appeared, but mostly as divisions that had eroded down to their new strengths, and divisions, such as the new 3rd Motor Rifle in the Moscow Military District, were formed on the basis of disbanding tank formations, rather than brigades. Few of the reforms planned in the early 1990s eventuated, for three reasons. Firstly, there was an absence of firm civilian political guidance, with Boris Yeltsin more interested in ensuring the Armed Forces were controllable and loyal, rather than reformed.[13] Secondly, declining funding did not assist matters, and thirdly, there was no firm consensus within the military about what reforms should be implemented. General Pavel Grachev, first Russian Minister of Defence (1992-96), for all his talk of reform, wished to preserve the old Soviet-style Army, with large numbers of low-strength formations and continued mass conscription. The General Staff and the armed services tried to preserve Soviet era doctrines, deployments, weapons, and missions in the absence of solid new guidance.[14] A British military expert, Michael Orr, makes a cogent case that the hierachy had great difficulty fully understanding the changed situation because, as graduates of Soviet military academies, their education had given great operational and staff training, but in political terms had learned an ideology rather than a wide understanding of international affairs. Thus the generals could see only NATO expanding to the east, in contrast to Russian weakness, and could not reorientate themselves, let alone the Armed Forces as a whole, to the new challenges they faced.[15]
Internal crisis of 1993
The Ground Forces reluctantly became involved in the Russian constitutional crisis of 1993 after then-President Yeltsin had issued an (illegal) decree dissolving the Parliament following its resistance to his consolidation of power and neo-liberal reforms. A group of deputies, including Vice President Alexander Rutskoi, had barricaded themselves inside. While giving public support to the President, the Armed Forces, led by General Grachev, tried to remain neutral, following the wishes of the officer corps.[16] Yeltsin had to plead for hours to get the military leadership, who were unsure of the rightness of his cause and the reliability of their forces, to commit to the attack on the Parliament. When the attack was finally mounted, the forces used came from five different divisions around Moscow, and the personnel involved were mostly officers and senior non-commissioned officers.[17] There were also indications that some formations deployed into Moscow only under protest.[18] However, once Parliament had been stormed, the parliamentary leaders arrested, and temporary censorship imposed, Yeltsin did succeed in retaining power.
Chechen Wars
The Chechen people had never willingly accepted Russian rule, and with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, had declared independence in November 1991 under a former Air Forces officer, General Dzhokar Dudayev.[19] With the continuation of Chechen "independence" seen as reducing Moscow's authority, a widespread perception of Chechniya becoming a haven for criminals, and the emergence of a hard-line group within the Kremlin advocating war, Yeltsin decided in November 1994 that action should be taken. At a Security Council meeting on November 29, he ordered the Chechens to disarm or else Moscow would restore order. Defense Minister Pavel Grachev assured Yeltsin that he would "take Groznyy with one airborne assault regiment in two hours."[20] The operation began on 11 December 1994 and by 31 December Russian forces were entering Grozny, the Chechen capital. The 131st Motor Rifle Brigade was ordered to make a swift push for the centre of the city but was then virtually destroyed in Chechen ambushes. After finally seizing Grozny, amid fierce resistance, troops moved on to other Chechen strongholds. When Chechen militants took hostages in the Budyonnovsk hospital hostage crisis in Stavropol Kray in June, 1995, peace looked possible for a time but fighting eventually went on. Dzhokar Dudayev was assassinated in April 1996, and that summer, a Chechen attack retook Groznyy. Alexander Lebed, then Secretary of the Security Council, began talks with the Chechen rebel leader Aslan Maskhadov in August 1996, signed an agreement on 22/23 August, and by the end of the month, fighting ended.[21] The formal ceasefire was signed in the Dagestani town of Khasavyurt on August 31, 1996, stipulating that a formal agreement on relations between the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria and the Russian federal government need not be signed until late 2001.
The Russian Ground Forces' performance in the First Chechen War has been assessed as ' appallingly bad'.[22] Writing six years later, Michael Orr said "one of the root causes of the Russian failure in 1994-96 was their inability to raise and deploy a properly-trained military force."[23]
The Second Chechen War began in August 1999 after Chechen militias crossed into Dagestan, followed quickly in early September by a series of four bombings across Russia, which prompted Russian military action against the alleged Chechen culprits. Initially the main Russian technique used was to lay waste an area with artillery and airstrikes before the land forces advances. Improvements were made in the Ground Forces between 1996 and 1999, and when the Second Chechen War started, instead of hastily-assembled "composite regiments" whose members had never seen service together, dispatched with little or no training, formations were brought up to strength with some replacements, put through preparatory training, and then dispatched. Combat performance improved accordingly.[24] However, the war has dragged on for years and is now spreading across the rest of the Russian Caucasus. It has has been a very divisive struggle, with at least one senior military officer dismissed for being less that responsive to government commands. General Colonel Gennady Troshev was dismissed in 2002 for refusing a move from command of the North Caucasus Military District to command of the less important Siberian Military District.
Reforms under Sergeyev
When Igor Sergeyev arrived as Minister of Defence in 1997, he started to initiate what were seen as real reforms under very difficult conditions.[25] The number of military educational establishments, virtually unchanged since 1991, was reduced, and the amalgamation of the Siberian and Trans-baikal Military Districts was ordered. A larger number of army divisions were given "constant readiness" status, which was supposed to bring them up to 80 percent manning and 100 percent equipment holdings. Sergeyev announced in August 1998 that there would be six divisions and four brigades on 24 hour alert by the end of that year. However, personnel quality—even in these favored units—continued to be a problem. Lack of fuel for training and a shortage of well-trained junior officers hamper combat effectiveness.[26] However, concentrating on the interests of his old service, the Strategic Rocket Forces, Sergeyev directing the disbandment of the Ground Forces headquarters itself in December 1997.[27] The disbandment was a 'military nonsense', in Orr's words, 'justifiable only in terms of internal politics within the Ministry of Defence'.[28] The Ground Forces' prestige declined as a result, as the HQ disbandment implied in theory at least that the Ground Forces were no longer an branch or service ranking equally with the Air Force and Navy.[29]
Reforms under Putin
Under President Vladimir Putin more funds have been committed, the Ground Forces Headquarters was reestablished, and some progress on professionalisation (see Kontraktniki below) has occurred. Plans call for reduction in mandatory service to 18 months in 2007 and to one year by 2008,[30] but a mixed Ground Force, of both contract soldiers and conscripts, will remain.
Funding increases began in 1999, when after some recovery in the Russian economy and associated income rise (especially from oil), "Russia's officially reported defence spending [rose] in nominal terms at least, for the first time since the formation of the Russian Federation."[31] The budget rose from 141 billion roubles in 2000 to 219 billion roubles in 2001.[32] Much of this funding has been spent on personnel—there have been several pay rises, starting with a 20% rise authorised in 2001, and the current professionalisation programme, including the 26,000 extra sergeants noted below, is expected to cost at least 31 billion roubles ($1.1 billion USD).[33] However, increased funding has been spread across the whole budget, with personnel spending being matched by greater procurement and research and development funding.
However given the insistance of the hierachy on trying to force contract soldiers into the old conscript pattern[34] there is little hope of a fundamental strengthening of the Ground Forces. They are expected to remain, to some extent, a military liability and "Russia's most urgent social problem" [35] for some time to come.
Personnel
The Ground Forces included an estimated total 395,000 including est. 190,000 conscripts and 35,000 personnel of the Airborne Forces (VDV) in 2006.[36] This can be compared to an estimated 670,000, with 210,000 conscripts, in 1995-96 (also an IISS estimate). These numbers should be treated with caution, however, due to the difficulty for those outside Russia to make accurate assessments.
The Ground Forces began their existance in 1992 inheriting practically unchanged the Soviet military manpower system, though it was in a state of rapid decay. The Soviet Armed Forces were traditionally manned through conscription, which had been reduced in 1967 from three to two years. This system was administered through the thousands of military commissariats (военный комиссариат, военкомат (voyenkomat)) located throughout the Soviet Union. Between January and May of every year, every young Soviet male citizen was required to report to the local voyenkomat for assessment for military service, following a summons based on lists from every school and employer in the area. The voyenkomat worked to quotas sent out by a department of the General Staff, listing how young men are required by each service and branch of the Armed Forces.[37] However since the fall of the Soviet Union draft evasion has skyrocketed; officials regularly bemoan the ten or so percent that actually fall within the call-up's net. The new conscripts were then picked up by an officer from their future unit and usually sent by train across the country. On arrival, they would begin the Young Soldiers' course, and become part of the system of senior rule, known as dedovshchina, literally "rule by the grandfathers." There were only a very small number of professional non-commissioned officers (NCOs), as most NCOs were conscripts sent on short courses[38] to prepare them for section commanders' and platoon sergeants' positions. These conscript NCOs were supplemented by praporshchik warrant officers, positions created in the 1960s to support the increased variety of skills required for modern weapons.[39]
The Soviet Army's officer-to-soldier ratio was extremely top-heavy, partially in order to compensate for the relatively low education level of the military manpower base and the absence of professional NCOs. Following the Second World War and the great expansion of officer education, officers became the product of four-to-five year higher military colleges.[40] As in most armies, newly commissioned officers usually become platoon leaders, having to accept responsibility for the soldiers' welfare and training (with the exceptions noted above). Young officers in Soviet Army units were worked round the clock, normally receiving only three holidays a month. Annual vacations were under threat if deficiencies emerged within the unit, and the pressure created enormous stress. Toward the end of the Soviet Union, this led a decline in morale amongst young officers.[41] Today junior officers do not wish to serve - in 2002 more than half the officers who left the forces did so early. [42]Their morale is low, among other reasons, because their postings are entirely in the hands of his immediate superiors and the personnel department. Without having to account for their actions, they can choose to promote or not promote him, to send him to Moscow or to some "godforsaken post on the Chinese border."[43]
There is little available information on the current status of women, who are not conscripted, in the Ground Forces. According to the BBC there were 90,000 women in the Russian Army in 2002.[44] Women serve in support roles, most commonly in the fields of nursing, communications, and engineering. Some officers' wives have become contract service personnel.
Kontraktniki
From small beginnings in the early 1990s, employment of contract soldiers has grown greatly within the Ground Forces, though many have been of poor quality (wives of officers with no other prospective employment, for example).[45] In December 2005, Sergei Ivanov proposed that in addition to the numerous enlisted contract soldiers, all sergeants should become professional, which would raise the number of professional soldiers and non-commissioned officers in the Armed Forces overall to approximately 140,000 in 2008. The current programme allows for an extra 26,000 posts for fully professional sergeants.[46]
The CIA said in their World Fact Book that thirty per cent of Russian army personnel were contract servicemen at the end of 2005, and that as of May 2006, 178,000 contract servicemen were serving in the Ground Forces and the Navy. Planning calls for volunteer servicemen to compose 70% of armed forces by 2010, with the remaining servicemen consisting of conscripts. At the end of 2005, the Ground Forces had 40 all-volunteer constant readiness units, with another 20 constant readiness units to be formed in 2006.[47] These CIA figures can be set against IISS data which reports that at the end of 2004, the number of contracts being signed in the Moscow Military District was only 17% of the target figure, in the North Caucasus 45%, and in the Volga-Ural MD 25%.[48]
Whatever the number of contract soldiers, commentators such as Alexander Golts are pessimistic that many more combat ready units will result, as senior officers "see no difference between professional NCOs, ...versus conscripts who have been drilled in training schools for less than six months. Such sergeants will have neither the knowledge nor the experience that can help them win authority [in] the barracks."[49] Defence Minister Sergey Ivanov underlined the awful in-barracks discipline situation, even after years of attempted professionalisation, when releasing the official injury figures for 2002. 531 men had died on duty as a result of accidents and crimes and 20,000 had been wounded (the numbers apparently not including suicides). According to Ivanov, "the accident rate is not falling."[50] Two of every seven conscripts will become addicted to drugs and alcohol while serving their terms, and a further one in twenty will suffer homosexual rape, according to 2005 reports. [51] Part of the reason is the feeling between contract servicemen, conscripts, and officers. Michael Orr: "There is no relationship of mutual respect between leaders and led and it is difficult to see how a professional army can be created without one. ..at the moment [2002] officers often despise contract servicemen even more than conscripts. 'Kontraktniki' serving in Chechnya and other 'hot spots' are often called mercenaries and marauders by senior officers."[52] Given this situation, it appears that any professional army of a Western type may be a long way off. Furthermore, the human cost of the current situation remains high, with the mistreatment of conscripts being labelled "one of Europe's worst human-rights scandals" by The Economist in 2005.[53]
Crime and corruption in the ground forces
The new Russian Ground Forces inherited an increasing crime problem from their Soviet predecessors. As draft resistance grew in the last years of the Soviet Union, the authorities tried to compensate by bring in more men with criminal records and who spoke little or no Russian. Crime rate soared, with the military procurator in Moscow in September 1990 reporting a 40% increase in crime over the previous six months, including a 41% rise in serious bodily injuries.[54] Disappearances of weapons rose to rampant levels, especially in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.[55]
Generals directing the withdrawals from Eastern Europe diverted arms, equipment, and foreign monies intended to build housing in Russia for the withdrawn troops. Several years later, the former commander in Germany, General Matvei Burlakov, and the Defence Minister, Pavel Grachev, were exposed as being involved, and also accused of directing the killing of a reporter, Dmitry Kholodov, who was investigating the scandals.[56]
A 1995 study by the U.S. Foreign Military Studies Office[57] went as far as to say that the Armed Forces were 'an institution increasingly defined by the high levels of military criminality and corruption embedded within it at every level.' The FMSO noted that crime levels had always grown with social turbulence such as the trauma Russia was passing through. He identified four major types among the raft of criminality prevalent within the forces—weapons trafficking and the arms trade; business and commercial ventures; military crime beyond Russia's borders; and contract murder. Disappearances of weapons had begun during the dissolution of the Union, as referred to above, and has continued. Within units, "rations are sold while soldiers grow hungry... [while] fuel, spare parts, and equipment can be bought."[58] Meanwhile voyemkomats take bribes to arrange avoidance of service, or a more comfortable posting. Beyond the Russian frontier, drugs were smuggled across the Tajik border, supposedly being patrolled by Russian guards, by military aircraft, and a Russian senior officer, a General Major Alexander Perelyakin, had been dismissed from his post with the UN peacekeeping force in Bosnia-Hercegovina, UNPROFOR, following continued complaints of smuggling, profiteering, and corruption. In terms of contract killings, beyond the Kholodov case, there have been widespread rumours that GRU Spetsnaz personnel have been moonlighting as mafiya hitmen.[59]
Reports such as these continue, and indicate that the much of the increased funding allocated to the armed forces is going to waste. Egregious examples have included a constant-readiness motor rifle regiment's tanks run out of fuel on the firing ranges, because petrol is being diverted to local businesses.[60] On this subject the last word may best be Sergey Ivanov's: visiting 20th Army in April 2002, he said the volume of theft was "simply impermissible".[61]
Organisation
The President of Russia is the Supreme Commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The Main Command (Glavkomat) of the Ground Forces, based in Moscow, directs activities. As noted above, this body was disbanded in 1997 but reformed by President Putin in 2001 by appointing General Colonel Nikolai Kormiltsev as the commander-in-chief of ground forces and also as a deputy minister of defense. Kormiltsev handed over to Colonel General Alexey Maslov in 2004, and in a realignment of responsibilities, the Ground Forces C-in-C lost his position as a deputy minister of defence.
The Main Command of the Ground Forces is comprised of the Main Staff of the Ground Troops, and departments for Peacekeeping Forces, Armaments of the Ground Troops, Rear Services of the Ground Troops, Cadres of the Ground Troops (personnel), Indoctrination Work, and Military Education.[62] There were also a number of directorates which used to be commanded by the Ground Forces C-in-C in his capacity as a deputy defence minister. They included Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Defence Troops of the Armed Forces, Engineer Troops of the Armed Forces, and Troop Air Defence, as well as several others. Their exact command status is now unknown.
Structure
The ground forces organizationally consist of the military districts (Moscow Military District, Leningrad, North Caucasus, Volga-Ural, Siberian and Far Eastern), nine armies, one army corps, motorized rifle (tank), artillery divisions, fortified districts, individual military units, military establishments, enterprises and organizations.[63]
The branches of service include motorized rifles, tanks, artillery and rocket forces, troop air defense, special corps (reconnaissance, signals, radioelectroninc warfare, engineering, radiation, chemical and biological protection, technical support, automobile and the protection of the rear), military units and logistical establishments.[64]
The Motorised Rifle Troops are the most numerous branch of service, that constitutes the nucleus of Ground Forces' battle formations. They are equipped with powerful armament for destruction of ground-based and aerial targets, missile complexes, tanks, artillery and mortars, anti-tank guided missiles, antiaircraft missile systems and installations, and means of reconnaissance and control. It is estimated that there are currently 19 motor rifle divisions, and the Navy now has several motor rifle formations under its command in the Ground and Coastal Defence Forces of the Baltic Fleet and the Northeastern Group of Troops and Forces on the Kamchatka Peninsula and other areas of the extreme north-east.
The Tank Troops are the main impact force of the Ground Forces and the powerful means of armed struggle, intended for the accomplishment of the most important combat tasks. There are currently three tank divisions in the force: 4th & 10th within the Moscow Military District and 5th Gds "Don" in the Siberian MD. The 2nd Tank Division in the Siberian Military District and the 21st Tank Division in the Far Eastern MD have disbanded in the last three years.
The Artillery and Rocket Forces provide the Ground Forces' main firepower and the most important operational means in the solution of combat problems by the crushing defeat of groupings of enemy. See Main Agency of Missiles and Artillery. The Ground Forces currently include 5-6 static defence Machine-gun/Artillery divisions and about three divisions of field artillery, including the 34th Guards in the Moscow MD, the 12th in Siberian MD, and possibly the 15th(?) in the Far Eastern MD. The Air Defense Troops (PVO) are one of the basic weapons for the destruction of enemy air forces. They consist of surface-to-air missiles, anti-aircraft artillery and radio-technical units and subdivisions.
Army Aviation, while intended for the direct support of the Ground Forces, is now under the control of the Air Forces (VVS).
Dispositions
Sources are Baumgardner, IISS Military Balance, Robinson, and Stukalin & Lukin cited below. [65] Note that the dispositions for the Siberian and Far Eastern Military Districts are unclear; information changes, and thus broad figures have been indicated only unless there is specific information available.
Formation | Headquarters Location | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Ground & Coastal Defence Forces of the Baltic Fleet | HQ Kaliningrad | |
? Motor Rifle Brigade | Kaliningrad | Designation uncertain - former 1st MRD |
18th Motor Rifle Division | Gusev | Cadre |
Leningrad Military District (General Igor Pouzanov) | HQ Saint Petersburg | |
138th Motor Rifle Brigade | Kamenka | |
200th Motor Rifle Brigade | Pechenga | |
2nd Separate Brigade of Special Designation (Spetsnaz) | Promezhitsy (Pskov region) | strength around 960 |
Moscow Military District (General Vladimir Bakin) | HQ Moscow | Also serves as HQ Western Front |
2nd Guards Motor Rifle Division | Alabino | |
16th Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Chuchkovo | Formerly at Teplyi Stan, suburb of Moscow |
20th Army | Voronezh | |
4th Guards Tank Division | Naro-Fominsk | Kantemirov Division |
10th Guards Tank Division | Boguchar | |
22nd Army | Nizhny Novogorod | |
3rd Motor Rifle Division | Novyy | |
Operational Group of Russian Forces in Moldova | Tiraspol | |
8th Motor Rifle Brigade | Tiraspol | Former 59th MRD |
North Caucasus Military District (General Alexander Baranov) | HQ Rostov-na-Donu | |
10th (Mountain) Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Molkino, Krasnodar region | Activated July 1, 2003 |
22nd Guards Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Kovalevka, Aksai, Rostov Oblast | |
131st Motor Rifle Brigade | Maykop | |
58th Army | Vladikavkaz | |
One Motor Rifle Division, Two Motor Rifle Brigades, One Motor Rifle Regiment | ||
Trans-Caucasus Group of Forces | Tbilisi | |
12th Military Base | Batumi, Georgia | To be withdrawn 2008-9; former MRD |
62nd Military Base | Akhalkalaki, Georgia | To be withdrawn 2008-9; former MRD |
102nd Military Base | Gumri, Armenia | former motor rifle division |
Volga-Ural Military District (General Colonel Vladimir Boldyrev) | HQ Yekaterinburg | |
3rd Guards Separate Brigade of Special Designation (Spetsnaz) | Roshchinsky (Samara Oblast) | |
12th Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Asbest-5, Sverdlovsk region | |
34th Motor Rifle Division | Yekaterinburg | |
15th Motor Rifle Brigade | Roshchinsky | New permanent peacekeeping brigade |
2nd Army | Samara | Former Volga MD HQ |
27th Motor Rifle Division | Totskoye | |
201st Motor Rifle Division | Dushanbe, Tajikistan | |
Siberian Military District (General Nikolai Makarov) | HQ Novosibirsk | |
Three Army HQs, One Tank Division, Two Motor Rifle Divisions, One Machine-Gun/Artillery Division | ||
74th Motor Rifle Brigade | Yurga | Constant readiness formation |
24th Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Kyakhta | |
67th Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Berdsk (Novosibirsk Oblast) | |
Far East Military District (Army General Vladimir Bulgakov) | Khabarovsk | |
Two Army HQs, One Corps HQ, Four Motor Rifle Divisions, Four Machine-Gun/Artillery Divisions | ||
14th Separate Brigade of Special Designation | Ussuriysk |
Equipment
Following the collapse of the USSR, the newly independent republics became host to most of the formations with modern equipment, whereas Russia was left with lower-category units with usually older equipment.[66] As financial stringency began to bite harder, the amount of new equipment fell as well, and by 1998, only 10 tanks and about 30 BMP infantry fighting vehicles were being bought each year.[67] Since then, the situation has not improved; in 2005 capability enhancements included about 40 T-90 main battle tanks, and 24 BMP-3 fighting vehicles.[68]
The Ground Forces retain a very large quantity of vehicles and equipment (see table below). [69] Much of this is in bases for storage of weapons and equipment, former mobilisation divisions, that will in all probability never be activated again. However, given the rate of equipment replacement given above—one to two battalions of fighting vehicles worth a year—set against the size of the Ground Forces, it will be decades before any large scale reequipment with new vehicles is even partially complete.
Jane's World Armies notes that the Soviet/Russian military tradition has never placed much importance on the survivability of individual soldiers, and thus personal equipment such as flak jackets and helmets has been found too heavy and uncomfortable, though apparently promises to improve the situation have been made. [70]
Equipment Summary[71]
Equipment | Numbers |
---|---|
Main Battle Tanks | 22,800+ |
Light Tanks | 150 (PT-76) |
Armoured Infantry Fighting Vehicles | 15,000+ |
Armoured Personnel Carriers | 9,900+ |
Towed Artillery | 12,765 |
Self Propelled Artillery | 6,000 |
Multiple Rocket Launchers | about 4,500 |
Mortars | 6,000 |
Self-Propelled Surface to Air Missiles | about 2,500 |
Ranks and insignia
The newly reemergent Russia retained most of the ranks of the Soviet Army with some minor changes. The principal difference from the usual Western style is some variation in generals' rank titles, in one case at least, Colonel General, derived from German usage. Most of the rank names were borrowed from existing German/Prussian, French, English, Dutch and Polish ranks upon the formation of Russian regular army in the late 1600s, and have lasted with few changes of title through the Soviet period.
Notes
- ^ http://www.mil.ru/848/1045/1272/1356/index.shtml
- ^ Michael Orr, The Russian Ground Forces and Reform 1992-2002, CSRC Paper D67, January 2003, p.2-3
- ^ Alexander Golts, Military Reform in Russia and the Global War Against Terrorism, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 17, 2004, p.30-1
- ^ Ministry of Defence of Russia official website, http://www.mil.ru/848/1045/1272/1357/index.shtml, accessed 28 October 2006, translated by Babelfish and amended for readibility.
- ^ International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 1992-3, Brassey's, 1992, p.89
- ^ IISS, 1992, p.89
- ^ IISS, The Military Balance 1995-96, p.102
- ^ Alexey D. Muraviev and Greg Austin, The Armed Forces of Russia in Asia, Tauris, 2001, p.257
- ^ M.J. Orr, The Russian Armed Forces as a factor in Regional Stabiliy, CSRC, June 1998, p.2
- ^ Otechestvennye zapiski, 2002, №8 http://magazines.russ.ru/oz/2002/8/2002_08_21.html
- ^ Pavel Baev, The Russian Army in a Time of Troubles, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, 1996, P.67
- ^ Charles Dick, Russian Views on Future War—Part 3, Jane's Intelligence Review, November 1993, p.488
- ^ Alexei Arbatov, Military Reform in Russia: Dilemmas, Obstacles, and Prospects, International Security, Vol. 22, No.4, Spring 1998, p.112, and Baev, 1996, p.67
- ^ Arbatov, 1998, p.113
- ^ Michael Orr, The Russian Ground Forces and Reform 1992-2002, CSRC Paper D67, January 2003, p.2-3
- ^ McNair Paper 34, The Russian Military's Role in Politics, January 1995, http://www.ndu.edu/inss/McNair/mcnair34/34fal.html
- ^ Alexey D. Muraviev and Greg Austin, The Armed Forces of Russia in Asia, Tauris, 2001, p.257
- ^ McNair Paper 34, 1995
- ^ Raymond C. Finch, Why the Russian Military Failed in Chechnya, Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS, http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/yrusfail/yrusfail.htm
- ^ C. W. Blandy, “Chechnya: Two Federal Interventions. An Interim Comparison and Assessment” (Conflict Studies Research Centre, P29, January 2000), p.13, cited in Dale Herspring, Undermining Combat Readiness in the Russian Military, Armed Forces & Society, Vol 32, No.4, July 2006.
- ^ Scott and Scott, Russian Military Directory 2002, p.328
- ^ Michael Orr, Better or Just Not So Bad? An Evaluation of Russian Combat Performance in the Second Chechen War, CSRC paper P31, 2000, p.82
- ^ Orr, 2000, p.87
- ^ Michael Orr, 2000, p.88-90.
- ^ Walter Parchomenko, The State of Russia's Armed Forces and Military Reform, Parameters (Journal of the US Army War College), Winter 1999-2000
- ^ Krasnaya Zvezda 28 January and 9 February 1999, in Austin & Muraviev, 2000, p.268, and M.J. Orr, 1998, p.3
- ^ Alexey Muraviev and Greg Austin, 2001, p.259
- ^ Orr, 2003, p.6
- ^ Orr, 2003, p.6
- ^ CIA World Fact Book 2006
- ^ IISS The Military Balance 2000-01, p.115
- ^ IISS Military Balance 2001-02, p.109
- ^ IISS Military Balance, Russia section, recent editions
- ^ Alexander Golts, Military Reform in Russia and the Global War Against Terrorism, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 17, 2004, p.33-4
- ^ Golts, 2004, p.30
- ^ IISS, Military Balance 2006, p.154
- ^ Carey Schofield, Inside the Soviet Army, Headline, London, 1991, p.67-70
- ^ Viktor Suvorov, Inside the Soviet Army, Hamish Hamilton, London, 1982, gives the figure of six months with a training division
- ^ William E Odom, The Collapse of the Soviet Military, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1998, p.43
- ^ Odom, 1998, p.40-41
- ^ Odom, 1998, p.42
- ^ Alexander Golts, 2004
- ^ Alexander Golts, Military Reform in Russia and the Global War Against Terrorism, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 17, 2004, p.35
- ^ Alan Quartly, Miss Shooting Range crowned, BBC News, 8 March 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2832265.stm
- ^ M.J. Orr, The Russian Armed Forces as a factor in Regional Stabiliy, CSRC, June 1998
- ^ IISS, The Military Balance 2006, p.147
- ^ CIA World Fact Book 2006, https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/rs.html
- ^ IISS Military Balance 2004-5, p.151
- ^ Alexander Golts, Military Reform in Russia and the Global War Against Terrorism, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 17, 2004, p.33-4
- ^ Michael Orr, The Russian Ground Forces and Reform 1992-2002, CSRC Paper D67, January 2003, p.12
- ^ Jane's World Armies, Issue 18, December 2005, p.564
- ^ Michael Orr, 2003, p.10
- ^ The Economist, How are the mighty fallen, 30 June 2005, http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4131583
- ^ William E Odom, The Collapse of the Soviet Military, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1998, p.302
- ^ Odom, 1998, p.302
- ^ Odom, 1998, p.302
- ^ Graham H. Turbiville, Mafia in Uniform: The Criminalisation of the Russian Armed Forces, http://leav-www.army.mil/fmso/documents/mafia.htm
- ^ Orr, 2003, p.10
- ^ Dr Mark Galeotti, "Moscow's armed forces: a city's balance of power", Jane's Intelligence Review, February 1997, p.52
- ^ Orr, 2003, p.10
- ^ Orr, 2003, p.10
- ^ Scott and Scott, Russian Military Directory 2004, p.118
- ^ Alexander Babakin, Approximate Composition and Structure of the Armed Forces After the Reforms, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye [Independent Military Review], No.31, August 20-26, 1994
- ^ Alexander Babakin, Approximate Composition and Structure of the Armed Forces After the Reforms, NVO, No.31, August 20-26, 2004
- ^ Kommersant-Vlast, "Vys Rossiya Armia". http://www.kommersant.ru/k-vlast/get_page.asp?page_id=2005769-22.htm, 14 May 2002, http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/9059/RussianArmedForces.html and "The Russian Armed Forces Today: A Structural Status Examination" (Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 18 No. 2 2005)
- ^ Austin and Muraviev, 2001, p.277-278
- ^ Nikolai Baranov, "Weapons must serve for a long while" Armeiskii sbornik, March 1998, no.3, p.66-71, cited in Austin and Muraviev, 2001, p.278. See also Mil Bal 95/96, p.110
- ^ IISS, The Military Balance 2005-2006, p.153
- ^ IISS, The Military Balance 2006, p.155
- ^ Jane's World Armies, Issue 18, December 2005, p.564
- ^ IISS Military Balance 2006, p.155
References
- Alexei Arbatov, Military Reform in Russia: Dilemmas, Obstacles, and Prospects, International Security, Vol. 22, No.4, Spring 1998
- Greg Austin, Alexey D. Muraviev, The Armed Forces of Russia in Asia, Tauris, 2001
- Alexander Babakin, Approximate Composition and Structure of the Armed Forces After the Reforms, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye [Independent Military Review], No.31, August 20-26, 2004
- Pavel Baev, The Russian Army in a Time of Troubles, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, 1996
- Neil Baumgarder, "Russian Armed Forces Order of Battle", http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/9059/RussianArmedForces.html
- Central Intelligence Agency, World Fact Book 2006, https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/rs.html
- Charles Dick, "Russian Views on Future War, Part 3", Jane's Intelligence Review, November 1993
- The Economist, How are the mighty fallen, 30 June 2005, http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4131583
- V.I. Fes'kov, V.I. Golikov and K.A. Kalashnikov, The Soviet Army In The Years Of The Cold War 1945-1991, Tomsk University Publishing House, 2004.
- Raymond C. Finch, Why the Russian Military Failed in Chechnya, Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, KS, http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/yrusfail/yrusfail.htm
- Dr Mark Galeotti, "Moscow's armed forces: a city's balance of power", Jane's Intelligence Review, February 1997,
- Alexander Golts, Military Reform in Russia and the Global War Against Terrorism, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 17, 2004
- Dale Herspring, Undermining Combat Readiness in the Russian Military, Armed Forces & Society, Vol 32, No.4, July 2006
- International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance, various editions
- A.G. Lenskii, M.M. Tsybin, The Soviet Ground Forces in the Last Years of the USSR, B&K Publishers, St Petersburg, 2001
- Mikail Lukin, Aleksander Stukalin, "Vys Rossiyskaya Armiya", Kommersant-Vlast, Moscow, Russia, 14 May 2002, and later 2005 edition
- McNair Paper 34, The Russian Military's Role in Politics, January 1995, http://www.ndu.edu/inss/McNair/mcnair34/34fal.html
- William E Odom, The Collapse of the Soviet Military, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1998
- Michael Orr, The Russian Armed Forces as a factor in Regional Stabiliy, CSRC, June 1998
- Michael Orr, Better or Just Not So Bad? An Evaluation of Russian Combat Performance in the Second Chechen War, CSRC paper P31, 2000
- Michael Orr, The Russian Ground Forces and Reform 1992-2002, CSRC Paper D67, January 2003
- Walter Parchomenko, The State of Russia's Armed Forces and Military Reform, Parameters (Journal of the US Army War College), Winter 1999-2000
- Alan Quartly, Miss Shooting Range crowned, BBC News, 8 March 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2832265.stm
- Colin Robinson, The Russian Ground Forces Today: A Structural Status Examination, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol 18, No.2, 2005
- Carey Schofield, Inside the Soviet Army, Headline, London, 1991
- Harriet Fast Scott and William F. Scott, Russian Military Directories 2002 & 2004
- Viktor Suvorov, Inside the Soviet Army, Hamish Hamilton, London, 1982
- Graham H. Turbiville, Mafia in Uniform: The Criminalisation of the Russian Armed Forces, U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, 1995, http://leav-www.army.mil/fmso/documents/mafia.htm