Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Just H

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tlim7882 (talk | contribs) at 01:11, 3 January 2007 ([[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Just H|Just H]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Voice your opinion (2/1/0); Scheduled to end 00:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Just H (talk · contribs) – Hi, i've been mulling going for adminship for awhile now, and I got a push from a friend of mine today. I have over 5,000 edits, varied throughout all spaces, and 5 months of experience. Just H 00:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept. Just H 00:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Mostly closing afds, and keeping watch on vandals on RC patrol and block them if they continue after being given a warning. I'm on RC alot, but I don't talk to the vandals or revert because whenever I do, I get into an edit conflict with a bot nowadays.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: So far, that'd have to be 2006 New England Patriots season, I have nearly 200 edits on that article alone. Somebody deleted the {{promotional}} pics on there for some reason(haven't checked yet), so it's looking a little sparse right now. Just H 00:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you believe other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Nothing huge, although the biggest one was with Jimbo Wales, who seemed to be insulting me and my opinion. I agreed to disagree and dropped the subject.
General comments

Discussion

Support

  1. Support. A solid contributor who won't misuse the sysop bit. Jay(Talk) 01:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Support of course. In the time I've known you, you've been nothing but helpful and friendly. --Tlim7882 01:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose Sorry, I must oppose. The vast majority of your edits were made last month, and most of them consisted of welcoming users/tagging talk pages with templates. That really does not convince me that you are currently experienced enough to be entrusted with the tools. By the way, could you please provide a link to your disagreement with Jimbo Wales? --Húsönd 01:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral