Jump to content

Talk:Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yelmaz23 (talk | contribs) at 02:02, 15 October 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

The article's voice is that of a member or recruiter of the group and not a neutral observer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.134.147.89 (talk) 06:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surely. This article was written by only based on the official website of this organization and we cannot see any third-party sources. Unfortunately it's nothing but their propaganda. Takabeg (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a scholarly third-party reference.  Nipsonanomhmata  (Talk) 12:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's not enough. Moreover, David Romano doesn't use the term East Kurdistan. Takabeg (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have changed the term "East Kurdistan" to "Iran" (see "Iranian Kurdistan").  Nipsonanomhmata  (Talk) 12:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say that we must not use the term East Kurdistan :) It was problem related only with providing sources. I think we can use East Kurdistan (Rojhilatê Kurdistanê) in articles. For example, we can write ...they call East Kurdistan (Kurdish: Rojhilatê Kurdistanê) of course it's necessary to use sources. Takabeg (talk) 12:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name

According to their official website, the English name of this organization is Komala. Takabeg (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's similar to KOMELA (Komeleyê Jiyanêwê Kurdistan). Takabeg (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology

http://komalah.org/english/program/3006.html

In their program they state that they are a Marxist party whose intentions are to build a socialist society based on from the ability to the need. Although I don't see any explicit reference to communism I'd think that it's fair to say that they are not social democrats.Onthehook (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The party is the Kurdish branch of the Communist Party of Iran. Albeit CPI is not a classical Marxist-Leninist party, I think it's fair to use the label communist. --Soman (talk) 05:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is not fair to label Komala as a Marxist group based on wrong information and wrong references as has been mentioned above. This information which is based on the link above is not correct. this link http://komalah.org/english/program/3006.html which is been used as a reference dos not belong to the Komala Party Of Iranian Kurdistan. this is Komalah CPI. to represent Komala you may use this link http://www.komalainternational.org/2018/03/05/komalas-beliefs. Thanks --Yelmaz23 (talk) 02:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true, Komala is a social democrat party from Kurdistan of Iran. Komala party has adopted the social democracy as it’s core ideology since 2000, komala is now a member of Social Democrat family Ms. judit neurink says in several article Komala is a social democrat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keywan faramarzi (talk • contribs) 17:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC) Keywan faramarzi (talk) 10:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Komala stands for a democratic, pluralist, secular, and federal Iran that is based on the rule of law which guarantees and safeguards the fundamental liberties and human rights of all ethnic groups in Iran. It advocates for a broad-based democratic coalition in Iran and for solidarity amongst ethnic and religious minorities that historically have been marginalized and persecuted by Iran’s current Islamist regime. Having adopted the European social democracy model as a fair and appropriate solution for the diverse Iran, Komala has been promoting that political model both in Iran and within its Kurdish region inside Iran.[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you reverted changes?

@Vif12vf:, what is the reason for your changes in my edits? I have explained very well why and how I did these changes, includes your "properly sourced content", which it's obvious what is the mentioned one in original quote is Komala J-Q. In the history of Iranian Kurdistan there is at least 5 Komala: 1) The Society for the Revival of Kurdistan (Komeley Jiyanewey Kurd, also abbreviated as "Komala Je-Qaf/Kaf", "Komala J-Q/k", or basically Komala), which later founded Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan; 2) Komala (1969-1983), founded after participants 1967-8 Iranian Kurdistan uprising who adopted pro-China position, and united with already existing pro-China groups in Iranian Kurdistan, with the help Komala-ye Ranjdaran in Iraq, 3) Komala, Kurdistan Organisation of the Communist Party of Iran, still exists and led by Ibrahim Alizadeh, 4) Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, led by Abdullah Mohtadi, split from Komala CPI in 2000 [which this is the group we're talking about], pro-Western, part of Socialist International and definitely not communist; 5) Komala-Komala Zahmetkeshan Kurdistan (Komala-KZK) or Komala-Kurdistan Toiler's Party, led by Omar Elkhanizadeh, split from Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan in 2000's, in ideological sense same with Abdullah Mohtadi but his views on civil struggles more positive than armed struggle.
So your "properly sourced content" is nothing but a misunderstanding. Also, I made an important edit: Organisation declared restart of it's armed struggle in 2017 and I have added this information and gave source for it. Why did you reverted this?
You said: "Primary sources are not accepted for ideologies.", than what is the source? Even these things I have added declared by themselves isn't propagandist way and "non-primary" sources mostly talks about this groups existence (like armed struggle or relations with other Kurdish groups), nothing much about it's ideology (and important part of it talks about their ideology gaves wrong information, like you defended). You said: "You also added unsourced ideologies which is not a good thing.", then I had to ask: What is your source for communism and Maoism? First of all, Komala rejected Mao in it's 1979 congress and taken a pro-Albania line. Later, after 1981, they take a similar line with Mansoor Hekmat's Union of Communist Militans and in 1983 united with semi-ouvrierist groups like Union of Communist Militans and some post-Mao groups (after collapse of Peykar and Razmendagan [both pro-Mao]). This Komala Party, which split from original Komala in 2000, does not uphold communism in any way. I couldn't add sources on these issues, because they're way pragmatist to write their exact ideology in their English web site. But this issue also mentioned in Komala CPI's article in wikipedia. Also it's obvious for a movement which part of Socialist International, they can't be a Maoist or communist group. Also, their pro-American line too proves that.
I demand an explanation from you to defend your revert. I have explained everything I can and gave sources which I can add.
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 16:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vif12vf: I'm still waiting for an explanation. Your revert of changes ends with giving people wrong or non-actual informations. If you won't give me good explanation and if you won't defend your position then I'm gonna revert back this article to my changes.
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About concensus

@Vif12vf: @Pahlevun: for several days, your edits on Komala focusing on if Komala is communist or not. I gave several sources for Komala's stand and proved that they're social-democrats from words of General Secretary, Abdollah Mohtadi. But still you people, who can't give source for your positions, are demanding a concensus, which none of you contributed to this talk page. Before that I had mentioned to Vif12vf, but he did not responded. Pahlevun, who is not giving a source for it's change, also didn't replied me. There is 5 fractions of Komala, one of them is worker communist (CPI), other one is "socialist" (Socialist Komala), and remaining three fractions are all comes from Komala which refounded in 2000, and none of them has communist views. Elkhanzadeh's group split because they had disagreements with Mohtadi on armed struggle, for them civil struggles were primary. Other group split because of organisational issues. Nowadays I'm collecting sources on Komala (mostly in English, French, Turkish) because I'm planning to write an article for it in Turkish, so I'm familiar with this issue. If you have any sources on your claims, prove it. And for once, reply to me. All the things you people do is just reverting and not arguing. If you gonna contribute this talk page, then contribute. But don't expect from me waiting you until forever, I will wait few days and if none of you won't defend it's positions I think I have right to revert to my changes.
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 13:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Beyaz Deriili. A few weeks ago, I was reading this piece by Al-Monitor and what drawn my attention the most, was mention of this Wikipedia page, and the fact that this organization wants its communist ideology kept out of sight –despite openly using red star as a symbol and carrying the word Zehmetkêşan in the Kurdish name, which is roughly proletariat–, because it wants to seek support in the United States (where they have formally registered as a lobby organization; and this ideology is clearly not embraced). As a result, there would be no surprise to see the group's leaders branding themselves as social democrats, democratic socialists or whatever like these. Another article published by the same source two years earlier highlights this. I took a look at the sources used in your proposed change, and as I understand, they are interviews and press release. As Wikipedia:Interviews points out, such sources are potentially problematic in regard to WP:RS policy. The two links are to dckurd.org and ekurd.net, whose reliability is questionable. I'm not proficient in Turkish, but I can say that the other source is definitely another interview that falls to the above-mentioned category at best. I personally prefer to use sources subject to Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history) for articles like this, which advantages WP:SCHOLARSHIP over WP:NEWSORG sources. I welcome you presenting academic sources that state they are social democrats (for example), to see what we can do on the mainspace. Pahlevun (talk) 20:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Pahlevun: first of all, this is not only a interview, but an interview with organisations leader, which openly declares their positions. And I think for reliability, just because Al Monitor is a known source, it doesn't means that everything published in that (especially a complo theory like their hidden communism) correct. For academic sources, there is not much of thing about Komala which gives detailed info, their views etc. (mostly, revolutionary organisations, political journals, some news reports, for example these two: 1, 2 doing that), due to lack of understanding the organisation mostly (and also some sources mostly mix or confuse Komala Zahmetkeshan with Komala CPI). But still, let's assume for a moment that interview given by leader of that organisation is not reliable, or their documents etc. too, still I suppose it has a better reliability than complo theory or sourceless claims.
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 04:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No one claims that everything on that source (or any other) is the truth. More importantly, we work with Verifiability, not truth, so let's stick to WP:RS and WP:VER guidelines. I did not get you by "sourceless claims" in the article, because at the moment everything is well-sourced. Please make your intention specific. I stress again that I would welcome you bringing reliable sources to discussion. This is a little off our discussion, but I think it would be helpful to clarify more on the situation: many sources have doubted organizational independence of some Kurdish insurgent groups, for example PJAK is believed to be the same as PKK: same leadership, same resources, same people, different names in use. These kind of groups usually operate in cells, and to which group the cell belongs to is not so transparent (at least in the sources). A few days ago, some Iranian servicemen were killed in an attack but it is not known which Kurdish group was behind it [1] and I have not seen any group taking responsibility yet. Komala factions use the same name (and except one, the same symbol). Government of Japan does not distinguish between the factions led by Mohtadi and Alizade. Iranian sources maintain that despite their differences, objectives of Komala factions remain broadly aligned and they do cooperate like wings. The same applies to KDPI (HDKA) and KDP (HDK), who are even housed in the same building (known as The Democrat Castle). Komala publicly speaks in favor of Federalism (instead of Secessionism) but names its television network with the word it frequently uses, Rojhelat (eastern Kurditan), implying that the Kurdish-majority region of Iran is actually the eastern part of a single united Kurdistan. They use Flag of Kurdistan along with their own. There is too much commentary and if we use sources like ekurd.net or dckurd.org, the other side of story would probably be Fars News Agency (for example). To weight one narration over another would probably lead to a battleground. This is the reason that I insist on using sources subject to Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (history). Such sources would help us write this article better. Pahlevun (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well then, if "reliability" is more important for Wikipedia than truth, and not misinforming people, I won't struggle for it. If you all have piece in your mind for this, then I have peace in my mind for not correcting it too. Have a nice day you all.
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 06:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pahlevun you say that Komala has been trying to define itself as “social democrat” because of its lobbying efforts in the US since 2018, but that’s not TRUE. A joint Finnish - published in 2011 defines Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan as social democrat. See page 81 of the report here.--MiladAz92 (talk) 16:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the terrorism labeling is concerned, it is an unapproved allegation by the Iranian Intelligence officials. This is an accusation by an [which is itslef a state-sponsor of terroris]m with its IRGC also designated as a terrorist organization by the US. Khasrow1976 (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@khasrow @Pahlevun @Beyaz Deriili I have read the Japanese page carefully and the language is not clear as to which organization or which Komala was involved and the allegations are based on what the Iranian officials of intelligence have provided which is not reliable because the same officials have attributed it to Zionism and America. Besides, all the Kurdish political organizations including Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan condemned the terrorist act in Mahabad in a joint statement in 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yelmaz23 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pahlevun Beyaz Deriili Yelmaz23 According to two news reports by Los Angeles Times and Christian Science Monitor, the Iranian officials have accused Zionism, the US and PKK for the bombing attack in Mahabad.--MiladAz92 (talk) 19:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @ Pahlevun, following the topic of the attacks of Mahabad, as @ MiladAz92 , @ Yelmaz23 and @ Beyaz Deriili have previously mentioned, i also have found some reports out. I think this article must publish Komala’s position on the Mahabad bombing to be fair and reliable. The Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan and it’s leader, Abdullah Mohtadi, condemned the bombing in Mahabad immediately as mentioned in the WashingtonPost, BBC and Aljazeera. The Iranian officials in the province of West Azarbayjan accused the Israel, the US and PjAk for the bombing as usual without providing any evidence.--Halovand (talk) 12:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear contributors, I think the Islamic Republic of Iran is a dangerous regime in the world, indeed, Tehran has spent as much as $700 million per year to support terrorist groups. The Iranian regime will do whatever it takes to maintain its grip on power and spread its violent, revolutionary ideology.--Navid Atashbaz (talk) 07:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friends and contributors: When Komala is used in Kurdish and Iranian politics, it can refer to three totally different organizations. First: The [Kurdsitan Organization of Iran Communist Party] led by Ibrahim Alizade , aka Komala CPI, which is a communist leaning organization. Second is the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan established in fall 1969, aka Komala PIK, which joined several other forces to establish Komala CPI in fall 1983. Before splitting from Komala CPI in 2000, Komala PIK Leadership had started to criticize the far left ideological and dogmatic views of Komala CPI which was in sharp contrast with the democratic views of the leaders of Komala PIK including human rights, women rights, freedoms, liberties and market economy. Third, [of the Toilers of Kurdistan], a small group led by Omar Ilkhanizade which split from the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan in 2007. As you can see, these are very different organizations and the only one leaning toward communism is the one led by Alizade while the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan defines itself as a moderate organization with social democratic values for a federal, secular and democratic. Khasrow1976 (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Khasrow1976 (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’d like to add this point to the article if my fellow contributors agree. As can be seen in an article published by soldier of fortune, Komala leader Abdulla Mohtadi is a founding member of ITC, Iran Transition Council, an assembly of key figures and prominent personalities and organization that seeks a nonviolence democratic solution for the theocratic rule in Iran. Komala has long ceased its armed activities and is supporting a peaceful solution. Thanks Idin 2828 (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everybody. I just found out a report published by Newsweek in which it clearly says Komala is supporting a democratic federal Iran and that the Komala Party is playing a leading role in uniting democratic forces for achieving that goal. Komala is a force for democracy and human rights and that needs to be reflected in this article to be fair and accurate. Thank you. MiladAz92 (talk) 09:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keywan faramarzi (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Friends, if you agree, I think this part of the Japanese news will be removed![reply]

@Pahlevun Beyaz Deriili Yelmaz23 Indeed I believe in the structure of a valid article that must be inserted the all necessary parameters relevant to the neutral references to build the form of a valid article. The most important issue above all the necessary parameters include trustworthy sources, especially these resources must be complete and accurate and also don't behave any roots in enmity, they must be completely neutral. But I see you're non-compliant with the law of written the article and just use the references that are based in the enmity, which rooted in the Iranian regime's sources. I think you are must be neutral, and at the main article analysis, the information on the current situation and the Komala PIK's position compared to other Kurdish parties and among the Iranian oppositions. You are in the as fierce critic form helping to invalidate the article and you deprive the readers of the benefit of a true and valuable article. Please think about this. you absolutely don't want to accept the reality, indeed you are always rejecting and ignoring all credible sources, and this is against international law, especially Wikipedia's law. Even the leader of this party Mr. Abdullah Mohtadi, Secretary-General of the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, reacted positively to Prince Reza Pahlavi's “New Covenant”. And also, due to the many sources which you can search and read, the communist ideology is a delusion in this political period. If you want to serve a great article for readers, I recommend you for more trying in learning how to write a reliable article and avoid falsifying history, because this issue causes variation and schism of Iranian people's thoughts in negative forms. Look at your references, all these are the and based on relativity and allegations and non-neutral. You are in the unfair form trying to destroying a reformed political attitude which is in the harmony with the social-democrats' peacefully ideology in the world. Your dishonesty is recognizable due to your fake user names and the people distinguish between truth and falsehood references and I welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the page Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, you may have a conflict of interest with Komala PIK and I think due to this issues you are not neutral.If you are honest, muse be insert the IRGC is a terrorist organization, and also, write the Komala Party have a three-branch, which they are absolutely different in their ideologies.--Navid Atashbaz (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For this conversation, I'm not interested with Komala because in this page (even though everybody knows the reality), there is a crime committed: Misinforming people, lying to people. That's why, I'm not interested with any of these debates, so I'm asking for contributors to do not @ my name in conversations. My contributions, which used both first hand and second hand sources, disregarded by other people and I'm not a dishonorable person who will insist to contribute in these kind of conditions. I'm not interested with anything about Komala or anything by Pahlevun in Wikipedia. Have a nice day.
Beyaz Deriili (talk) 19:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Affiliation

Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is a member of Iran Transition Council, [Congress of Nationalities for a Federal Iran], Solidarity for Freedom and Equality in Iran, the Council of Iranian Democrats. and Cooperation Center for Iranian Kurdistan Political Parties. The Secretary General of Komala, Abdulla Mohtadi, is the Secretariat for Special affairs of ITC and Nahid Bahmani, a leadership member of Komala, is the Secretariat of Ethnic Affairs of ITC. Khasrow1976 (talk) 15:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 8 October 2020

As a Kurdish observer and somebody with close working relation with the organization and with good knowledge of Kurdish politics, I believe this article needs some corrections. I have placed my contributions on the talk page and I am asking for correcting the following points:

First: When we talk about Komala, there are three distinct organizations working under the same shortened name. One of them is called [Kurdistan' Organization of Communist Party of Iran, Komala CPI]. This organization is the only Komala which is a communist party. The other two Komalas inclduing the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan and [of Toilers of Kurdistan]. The Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is a social democratic organization and exactly for this reason, it split from the Komala CPI in 2000. It has also been mentioned, in many occasions, by the leader of Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, Abdullah Mohtadi, that his Komala is a social democratic force working for a secular federal democratic Iran. There are many sources in Kurdish and Persian in which Komala PIK is defined as a social democratic force by independent researchers and teh party leaders.

Second, When it comes to Japan's designation of organizations, the Japanese webpage and its language is very confusing and vague when it mentions both Komala PIK and Komala CPI. First of all, the sources are the mentioned to be Iranian intelligence officials, a country which has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism by the US. Officials of a regime which is on the terrorism list is not a reliable source. Second, you can't accuse two different organizations of terrorism based on the same incident. Both Komala PIK and Komala CPI are being shown under Japan's designation list. This cannot be valid and reliable.

I hope independent reviewers can review and help in correcting the information.Khasrow1976 (talk) 16:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 8 October 2020

Hello; this is a user with affiliation with the subject. I suggest the following section including new content to be added.

-- National Affiliation --


Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is a member of Iran Transition Council, [Congress of Nationalities for a Federal Iran], Solidarity for Freedom and Equality in Iran, the Council of Iranian Democrats. and Cooperation Center for Iranian Kurdistan Political Parties. The Secretary General of Komala, Abdulla Mohtadi, is the Secretariat for Special affairs of ITC and Nahid Bahmani, a leadership member of Komala, is the Secretariat of Ethnic Affairs of ITC. --Khasrow1976 (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 9 October 2020

Ideology from 1969 to the present — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keywan faramarzi (talk • contribs) 21:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

XKeywan faramarzi (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not really clear what you want to have changed. Please provide (reliable) sources to each phrase you want to include in the article. Wordpress and Ekurd will very probably not make it into a final version of the article. It is very unlikely someone will double-check such a long and unsourced text and then include it as you wanted. I'll try to include the progressive alliance part a bit more prominent (it was included already in the current version)Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 12 October 2020

"The Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan (Kurdish: كۆمه‌ڵه‌ی شۆڕشگێڕی زه‌حمه‌تكێشانی كوردستانی ئێران‎, romanized: Komełey Şorrişgêrrî Zehmetkêşanî Kurdistanî Êran, lit. 'Society of Revolutionary Toilers of Iranian Kurdistan'), commonly shortened to Komalah (Kurdish: Komełe‎; Persian: کومله‎), is a social democratic political party[1] from the Kurdish region of Iran. Komala has been seeking a secular democratic federal[2][3] ruling system to replace the current theocratic regime. It is currently exiled in northern iraq where its leadership and media are operating from"[4][5]Internationally Komala is a member of International Socialist[6] and Progressive Alliance,[7] both umbrella organizations for social democrats, socialist and progressive forces. Aside from that, it is committed to prohibition on sexual violence and child protection in armed conflicts[8][9] as well as a ban on anti-personnel mines.[10]Keywan faramarzi (talk) 09:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the above article should be updated as it is Navid Atashbaz (talk) 10:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Department of Justice and Police (FDJP) Pages 81 and 82
  2. ^ nyidanmark
  3. ^ UNHCR refworld page 2
  4. ^ Ministerie van Justitie
  5. ^ gesetze-bayern/
  6. ^ socialistinternational
  7. ^ progressive-alliance
  8. ^ Documet
  9. ^ theirwords
  10. ^ genevacall

Request edit on 13 October 2020

I suggest a new section to be added for the page under the Title of

International Affiliation

Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is an organization which believes in worldwide engagements and memberships to exchange and share viewpoints, policies and values. Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is currently a consultative member of the International Socialist, a worldwide organization for progressive forces including social democrats, socialists and labor parties to gather under.

Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is also a member of the German-based Progressive Alliance, an [organization] with member organizations from social democrats and progressive organizations that believe in both social democracy and social progress.

Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan is a member of Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, UNPO, an international organization aimed at promoting the neglected and marginalized nations. Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan [[2]] joined UNPO in 2007. --Khasrow1976 (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit on 13 October 2020

Fight against Terrorism

Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan joined other Kurdish forces from the Iranian Kurdistan in the fight against ISIS, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, under the command of KRG ministry of Peshmerge. The Iranian Kurds were soon asked by KRG to retrieve to retrieve their forces from the frontline. According to Al Arabiya and BBC and Al Monitor news reports, the order came after the Islamic Republic of Iran and its [[3]] Quds Force Commander, [[4]] Soleimani, had asked KRG not to let Iranian Kurds join the fight. --Khasrow1976 (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Komala_Party_of_Iranian_Kurdistan&oldid=983582885"