Jump to content

Stream crossing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article covers crossings over small streams, not those over large rivers.

Stream crossings are the numerous instances where small perennial or intermittent streams are crossed by roads, pipelines, railways, or any other thing which might restrict the flow of the steam in ordinary or flood conditions. Crossings over any dry channel which might carry flood water is included. Any structure over or in a stream which results in limitations on the movement of fish or other ecological elements can be an issue.

Types

In addition to bridges and culverts streams may be crossed by fords, floodways, low-water crossings or even stepping stones.

Conveyance capacity

Often expressed in cubic feet per second (cfs), conveyance capacity is the amount of water a stream crossing structure will pass. The amount of water that can be predicted during flood conditions, such as a 100-year flood is one design consideration.

Failure to convey

If stream flow exceeds the capacity of the passage through the crossing or it is plugged by debris the crossing may be overtopped or the stream diverted down the road. This may result in substantial erosion as flood water cuts a gully on the side of road. Diversion occurs when a road slopes downward from a crossing and the height of the road exceeds the height of any outlet down the road. A sag (dip) in the road below the crossing may serve as a channel for over flow of excess water and prevent water from continuing down the road but is only practical on gentle slopes.[1]

Structural integrity

What happens when a heavy truck passes over, or flood water plugs an opening with debris or overtops the structure.

Habitat continuity

Passage of wildlife, particularly fish such as salmon which spawn in streams, is a design consideration as is habitat continuity. In some jurisdictions, such as Massachusetts, these considerations may be incorporated into stream crossing regulations.[2]

See also

References

  1. ^ Michael J. Furniss; Michael Love; Sam A. Flanagan (December 1997). "Diversion Potential at Road-Stream Crossings". fs.fed.us/. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved April 29, 2018.
  2. ^ MassDOT personnel (December 2010). "Design of Bridges and Culverts for Wildlife Passage at Freshwater Streams" (PDF). MassDOT, Massachusetts Department of Transportation. State of Massachusetts. Retrieved April 28, 2018.

Further reading